1. Management & Control, Designation of Authorities State of play
6 June 2016 – Brussels
Claude Tournier, Head of Unit
DG Regional and Urban Policy
Audit Directorate – Unit C3

2. Aim of the designation process?
To ensure that MA and CA have the necessary and appropriate management and control system set up from the start of the programming period to ensure that they can fulfil the responsibilities assigned to them
Based on a report and an opinion of an IAB
Prior to the submission of the first application for interim payment to the Commission

3. Legal Basis & Guidance
Article Designation of authorities Reg. (EU) No 1303/2013 (CPR);
Article Procedure for the MA & CA designation;
Article 21 - Designation of authorities Reg. (EU) No 1299/2013 (ETC Reg.)
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1011/2014:
Annex III Model for the description of the functions and procedures in place for the managing authority and the certifying authority
Annex IV & V Model Audit report and audit opinion
Guidance note on Designation Procedure EGESIF_ final_18/12/2014 (

4. Designation process
Article 124(1) CPR "The Member State shall notify the Commission of the date and form of the designations, which shall be carried out at an appropriate level, of the managing authority and, where appropriate, of the certifying authority prior to the submission of the first application for interim payment to the Commission."
Article 124(2) CPR "The designations referred to in paragraph 1 shall be based on a report and an opinion of an independent audit body that assesses the fulfilment by the authorities of the criteria relating to the internal control environment, risk management, management and control activities, and monitoring set out in Annex XIII. (…)"

5. New Designation criteria Annex XIII CPR
A framework for Risk management
Procedures for putting in place Anti-fraud measures
Procedures for drawing up management declaration/ annual summaries/accounts
Procedures to ensure reliability of data on indicators/ milestones/progress of the OP in achieving its objectives

6. SFC2014 The notification of the designation and, where applicable, the designation package, are transmitted by the MS via SFC2014 for the Designation Process

7. Designation Decision To designate or Not ?
Opinion of IAB unqualified -> the MS can designate.
Opinion of IAB adverse or qualified -> no designation of that body; Probation period (Article 124 (5) CPR)
The MA/CA to resolve all outstanding issues (action plan) in order to be able to conclude with an unqualified opinion

8. Audit and control results
Supervision, the period of the probation and ending a designation
The designated authority no longer complies with the criteria underpinning designation
MS ends the designation of the authority and informs the COM
MS determines a probation period for the authority to undertake remedial actions
MS informs the COM of the probation period
MS designates another authority based on the applicable rules and informs the COM
Necessary remedial action is taken
MS lifts the probation
MS informs the COM
Necessary remedial action is not taken
MS ends the designation
MS informs the COM
MS designates another authority based on the applicable rules and informs the COM

9. Role of the Commission Article 124(3)(4)CPR
Commission's approval of the designation process is not required
─˃ Big change compared to
(I) For OPs > €250m and based on risk analysis
Commission may request IAB's audit report, opinion and MCS within 1 month of notification
2 months for Commission feedback
(II) For OPs > €250m and MCS changed significantly from
MS may submit IAB's opinion and MCS within 2 months of notification of designation
3 months for Commission feedback

10. Treatment of interim payments
Interim payments can start as soon as:
The managing and certifying authorites have been designated
The MS has notified the formal designation decision to the Commission following adoption of the programme
In cases (I) and ( II) above, the Commission may make observations within two/three months of receipt of the documents. Without prejudice to Article 83, the examination of those documents shall not interrupt the treatment of applications for interim payments

11. State of play ETC May 2016 69 ETC cannot submit payments applications
Notified 7 out of 76 ETC programmes (5 cross borders and 2 Transnational)
43 ETC programmes planned to be notified in the last quarter of 2016
1 planned to be notified in 2017
18 ETC have not submitted details on the planned timing of notification but internal work is "ongoing"
69 ETC cannot submit payments applications

12. Overview
The pace of notification is significantly lower than Member State forecasts
Risks that notifications awaited in the last quarter will slip into early 2017:
Risk of conflict of Priorities with Closure for the Audit authorities

13. Identified issues which may hamper the designation process
Lack of necessary IT monitoring and reporting systems
Design of effective and proportionate anti-fraud measures
Governance arrangements for validation (National, regional, layers; ETC: cross-border or transnational)
Lack of capacity at MA and AA level
Other?

14. Thank you for your attention