1. PROMISE: the Barnahus type MD/IA methodology and tracking tool
Service Exchange Meeting 2, Reykavik
14-16 June 2016

2. Content of the presentation
Introduction: what do we want to achieve with the methodology and the tracking tool and how?
Time table: development and pilots
Content
Discussion in groups
Next steps

3. Introduction: the methodology
Aim: to develop a tool which can be used by services in their process to be(come) a Barnahus type MD/IA and to define what is still missing in order to finalise this process
The methodology is a self-evaluation tool for data collection and analysis of current practice
The methodology is meant to INSPIRE, not to JUDGE

4. Introduction: the tracking-tool
Aim: to perform a simple and quick check for services, based on the methodology
The tracking-tool is a user-friendly tool for services
Stoplight-model

5. Timetable development methodology and tracking tool
Step 1: Identification of working elements: December January 2016
Step 2: Identification of existing self-assessment-tools: December 2015-January 2016
Step 3: Development of methodology and tracking tool: February – October 2016

6. Timetable pilot tracking tool
Step 1: Selection pilots: October-November 2015
Step 2: Piloting tracking tool and good practice guide CBSS: November 2016 –January 2017
Aims:
a) verification of the tracking tool by testing its user friendliness and
b) ‘a state of the art’ report of the main goals concerning being a Barnahus type MD/IA service in the pilot countries

7. Step 3: Analysis of the Pilot: February –March 2017
Step 4: Finalisation of the tracking-tool: March 2017 –May 2017

8. Content
Background of the methodology:
Excell grid
PROMISE PRINCIPLES: child friendly interventions
PROMISE CRITERIA: Barnahus type model MD/IA
PROMISE STANDARDS: quality of services
The methodology monitors the process of being an Barnahus type MD/IA service, NOT the quality

9. Goals and Subgoals related to scores
Three perspectives
Comment Box
Link good practices guide CBSS

10. 2. Who fills in the methodology?
A representative of the Barnahus type MD/IA service together with key stakeholders within the service

11. 3. How does the representative collects the data?
Hand-out: instructions for the representative
Meetings: 1 with management, 1 with professionals
Small survey among clients with SMILEY-PICTOGRAMS
Analysing the results in a score-system and give feedback to to the responsible persons

12. Discussion points in working groups
Content of the methodology.
Please your constructive comments on:
A. the basis of the goals and subgoals related to the PROMISE principles, criteria and standards
B. the way it has to be filled in by a representative of a service: organizing 2 meetings and 10 small questionnaires clients
C. the questions for clients (children)

13. 2. Which goals and subgoals are the most relevant for the development of the tracking tool and why(a distillation from the methodology)?

14. Next steps
Till October we will work on:
Finalise the methodology
Finalise the first concept tracking-tool
Program both in Excell
Link both products to the good practice guidance CBSS
Present final product methodology in Linköping
Prepare the pilots: in the beginning of November the pilot countries will get invited to fill in the concept tracking tool.

15. Bedankt voor uw aandacht o.i.d.
Thank you for you attention and constructive input!!
Jodi Mak
Bedankt voor uw aandacht o.i.d.

16. Discussion in small groups
Reading the table in the concept note concerning the methodology (10 minutes)
Discussing the methodology (30 minutes)
A. the basis of the goals and subgoals related to the PROMISE vision, criteria and standards
B. the way it has to be filled in by a representative of a service: organise 2 meetings and 10 small questionnaires clients
C. the questions for clients (children)

17. 3. Short break (10 minutes) 4. Discussing the main goals/sub-goals for the development of the tracking-tool (30 minutes) 5. Plenary discussion (20 minutes)