Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Figure 1 Annual trend in specimen type submitted as first sample for aquaporin-4 immunoglobulin G testing (serum only vs CSF only vs both) from 101,065.

Published byFarida Atmadjaja Modified over 5 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Figure 1 Annual trend in specimen type submitted as first sample for aquaporin-4 immunoglobulin G testing (serum only vs CSF only vs both) from 101,065."— Presentation transcript:

1 Figure 1 Annual trend in specimen type submitted as first sample for aquaporin-4 immunoglobulin G testing (serum only vs CSF only vs both) from 101,065 patients over a 9-year period Annual trend in specimen type submitted as first sample for aquaporin-4 immunoglobulin G testing (serum only vs CSF only vs both) from 101,065 patients over a 9-year period *Expected values based on number of samples tested by September 15, 2015. Masoud Majed et al. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm 2016;3:e231 © 2016 American Academy of Neurology

Download ppt "Figure 1 Annual trend in specimen type submitted as first sample for aquaporin-4 immunoglobulin G testing (serum only vs CSF only vs both) from 101,065."

Similar presentations

Figure 2 ALSFRS-R changes (A) Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) slope after 6 months of treatment without (left)

Figure 2 ALSFRS-R changes (A) Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) slope after 6 months of treatment without (left)
Figure 2 GlyR antibody binding

Figure 2 GlyR antibody binding
Figure 2. Change in total PSPRS score from baseline to each study visit for all participants Change in total PSPRS score from baseline to each study visit.

Figure 2. Change in total PSPRS score from baseline to each study visit for all participants Change in total PSPRS score from baseline to each study visit.
Figure 1 Percent positivity by clinical feature Overall, 6

Figure 1 Percent positivity by clinical feature Overall, 6
Figure 2 Anti-LINGO-1 (Li81) does not affect cytokine production

Figure 2 Anti-LINGO-1 (Li81) does not affect cytokine production
Figure 4 Relation of neuropsychological deficits and intrathecal immune cell subsets in GABAB receptor antibody–associated limbic encephalitis Relation.

Figure 4 Relation of neuropsychological deficits and intrathecal immune cell subsets in GABAB receptor antibody–associated limbic encephalitis Relation.
Figure 3 Immune response to neoantigen: Geometric mean titers of antirabies antibody levels over timeAt days 31 and 38, all subjects achieved antibody.

Figure 3 Immune response to neoantigen: Geometric mean titers of antirabies antibody levels over timeAt days 31 and 38, all subjects achieved antibody.
Figure 3 JCV index changes in JCV+ patients

Figure 3 JCV index changes in JCV+ patients
Figure DPPX antibodies as detected by fluorescence-based immunohistochemistry and a cell-based assayImmunohistochemistry displayed binding of the patient's.

Figure DPPX antibodies as detected by fluorescence-based immunohistochemistry and a cell-based assayImmunohistochemistry displayed binding of the patient's.
Figure 1 Flow diagram of the assays and the samples that were evaluatedA total of 1,109 samples were initially screened at a serum dilution of 1:20 for.

Figure 1 Flow diagram of the assays and the samples that were evaluatedA total of 1,109 samples were initially screened at a serum dilution of 1:20 for.
Figure 2 Brain biopsy Brain biopsy (A) Double staining with anti-aquaporin-4 (AQP4) antibody (dark green) and Luxol fast blue (blue) is shown. Loss of.

Figure 2 Brain biopsy Brain biopsy (A) Double staining with anti-aquaporin-4 (AQP4) antibody (dark green) and Luxol fast blue (blue) is shown. Loss of.
Figure 1 Linear relationship between CSF inflammation and glucose in meningitis; analysis stratified by diagnostic category (aseptic, n = 115 and microbial,

Figure 1 Linear relationship between CSF inflammation and glucose in meningitis; analysis stratified by diagnostic category (aseptic, n = 115 and microbial,
Figure 2 Neuropathologic examination for lymphoma etiology (patients 1–4)‏ Neuropathologic examination for lymphoma etiology (patients 1–4) Immunohistochemical.

Figure 2 Neuropathologic examination for lymphoma etiology (patients 1–4)‏ Neuropathologic examination for lymphoma etiology (patients 1–4) Immunohistochemical.
Figure 1 MOR103 sequential-dose trial flowchart of study population with multiple sclerosis aPatients received 2 doses of study drug before trial withdrawal.

Figure 1 MOR103 sequential-dose trial flowchart of study population with multiple sclerosis aPatients received 2 doses of study drug before trial withdrawal.
Figure 3 Gene expression in CSF cell pellets

Figure 3 Gene expression in CSF cell pellets
Figure 2 Correlation between total IgG levels and anti-AQP4 IgG titer

Figure 2 Correlation between total IgG levels and anti-AQP4 IgG titer
Figure 1 8-Iso-PGF2α levels in CSF of patients with MS and controlsCSF 8-iso-prostaglandin F2α (8-iso-PGF2α) levels were estimated using an ELISA. (A)

Figure 1 8-Iso-PGF2α levels in CSF of patients with MS and controlsCSF 8-iso-prostaglandin F2α (8-iso-PGF2α) levels were estimated using an ELISA. (A)
Figure 2 Mean serum concentrations of BIIB033 vs time(A) Single ascending dose study and (B) multiple ascending dose study. Mean serum concentrations of.

Figure 2 Mean serum concentrations of BIIB033 vs time(A) Single ascending dose study and (B) multiple ascending dose study. Mean serum concentrations of.
Figure 1 Peripheral blood leukocyte subset counts during dimethyl fumarate treatmentComplete blood cell counts were obtained at baseline (n = 34) and at.

Figure 1 Peripheral blood leukocyte subset counts during dimethyl fumarate treatmentComplete blood cell counts were obtained at baseline (n = 34) and at.
Figure 2 DTI values between the hepatitis C group and controls(A) DTI FA values, (B) DTI diffusion values. *Statistically significant at FDR-adjusted p.

Figure 2 DTI values between the hepatitis C group and controls(A) DTI FA values, (B) DTI diffusion values. *Statistically significant at FDR-adjusted p.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google