1. Undulator Scope, Management, Organization
Stephen Milton, ANL/APS

2. Outline
Undulator System Scope
Overall Organization
Management
Status of L3 Items
Summary

3. Undulator Hall Schematic Baseline Layout

4. Responsibilities for the Undulator System
ANL
L2 Undulator System Management
L3 at ANL
Undulators, Quadrupoles, Primary Adjustable Supports
Undulator System Diagnostics
Undulator System Vacuum System
Undulator System Controls

5. MMF Lay-out

6. Responsibilities for the Undulator System
L3 at SLAC
Magnet Measurement Facility (MMF)
Fixed Supports

7. Laboratory Relationship and L3 Organization
APS
J.M. Gibson
Assoc. Lab. Director
LCLS Undulator
S. Milton
Project Director
LCLS Project
J. Galayda
Project Director
Accel. Systems. Div.
R. Gerig
Division Director
D. Walters
Vacuum/Diagnostics
CAM
Exp. Facilities Div.
E. Gluskin
Division Director
M. White
Magnet Systems
CAM
R.Ruland/MMF
J. Welch/Fixed Support
CAMs
APS Operations Div.
W. Ruzicka
Division Director
J. Stein
Controls
CAM

8. LCLS Undulator System PED Org. (Present)
SLAC/AIM
S. Milton
LCLS Undulator Sys.
F. Coose, Project Analyst
F. Clark, PMCS
ANL Indirect
Support
P. Mast
PMCS Manager
As needed
D. Walters
Vacuum/Diagnostics
CAM
M. White
Magnet Systems
CAM
J. Stein
Controls
CAM
J. Bailey, ME (NE)
S.H. Lee, ME
B.X. Yang, Phy
I. Vasserman, Phy
R. Dejus, Phy
E. Traktenberg, ME
G. Lawrence, ME
E. Moog, Phy
SLAC
B. Dalesio
This is not a complete list as we have drawn heavily from others within ANL and SLAC, but at a lower fraction than those listed
SLAC
R. Ruland
Mag. Meas. Fac.
J. Welch
Fixed Support
Interfaces

9. FTEs for the Undulator System
25 Max Scale
4 Max Scale
~17A/6S
~15A/7S
~12A/10S
~6A
~3A/1S
Splits between ANL (A) and SLAC (S) are shown above
This year ANL tapped into 24 different people from 4 different divisions to perform the work
We will ramp up the amount we use these people next year
APS is giving LCLS top priority in resource allocation
Move to management section talk. SC3.
Reconciled to April of 04
Ramp up not as bad as it seems
Include an org. chart instead.

10. Ramp Up Plan of Action ANL/APS Project Management
Argonne has recently established an Office of Project Management
APS has a formalized Project Management System that encompasses all project large and small
The LCLS project has been integrated into this system and has been assigned top priority
Biweekly Meetings are held with Murray Gibson (the APS Director)
(Provided we are both in town)
These lead in to DD meetings and resource allocation
Past Actions/Performance
Last December/January we needed additional resources assigned.
A letter was sent to Gibson requesting people.
A meeting with the Division Directors was held.
Additional resources were assigned to the project as per the request
Future Actions
We are using the P3 resource loaded schedule to define and broadcast our needs for future resources.
With this in hand we will use a similar method as described above to obtain the required resources to complete the project as per the plan.

11. Labor vs. M&S
Move over to breakout
Give examples
M&S dominates the distribution due to the limited number of unique items being produced and the large quantity of each item.

12. Undulator System Critical Path (1 of 3)
Undulator Delivery Assembly Path
FY06 Funding
Goes in breakout
Total Float = 164 days
Driven by FY06 Construction Funding

13. Undulator System Critical Path (2 of 3)
Undulator Delivery Assembly Path

14. Undulator System Critical Path (3 of 3)
NOV 07
SEPT 08

15. Final Design, Plans, Issues associated with Procurement
Complete
Final Design Review Scheduled for Sept. 16 – 17
Plans and Issues Associated with Procurement
Procure LLP Items
Ti Strongback
Magnets
Magnet Poles
Have a 1st article assembled in industry prior to going out for full production
1st article undulators are not in the baseline for FY05; however, awarding them in FY05 to coincide with delivery of first lot of long-lead items significantly reduces the undulator schedule risk.
Issues
Receiving the BA early enough to purchase all the Ti in one fiscal year
Moving forward in FY05 with the 1st article
Additional Details found in M. White’s Talk
Move to breakout
Add a last slide summary
Major accomplishments
Requiremnts approved
Review of Baselined cost and schedule
Ready to go
Back awhile talk about key issues
Tight thermal and alignment issues
Finalize with key issues and risks over next year
Action plan
summarize

16. Other Items Not Found in Other Talks
Diagnostics
RF BPMs
We have not done any additional work on RF BPMs this year. The budget was not sufficient for this.
We are relying on work performed by the NLC collaboration that shows that the RF BPMs have resolution sufficient to meet the needs of the LCLS.
We are also relying on the fact that the people that did this earlier work are at SLAC and are willing to contribute to the LCLS effort when called upon.
Some additional studies of BPM systems are being carried out by other members of the LCLS group at SLAC.
Quadrupole Focusing
Permanent Magnet vs. Electromagnet Designs
We are currently studying the pros and cons of using EM quadrupoles rather than PM quadrupoles
Strength variation of EM quads can be used to validate the beam-based alignment process but…
…so can moving a permanent magnet quadrupole out of the path of the beam provided it can be placed back exactly where it was to start with.
There are cost tradeoffs as well.
We need this decision soon (within 2 months)

17. Other Items Not Found in Other Talks
Integration of the Complete Undulator System
This is an excellent idea…but we need to work on it more.
The budget was not sufficient for this.
SLAC Undulator Integration Engineer
SLAC will be hiring someone soon to be our point of contact for a smooth integration of our undulator system into SLAC
Undulator System Deputy
A deputy will be added to the Undulator System Team
The Deputy’s duties will include system and engineering integration.

18. Summary
We understand the scope
We have a plan
We are organized to carry out that plan
We have the internal support we need to perform the plan
Through success in this review we will obtain the external support needed to perform and carry out the plan