1. Measuring College and Career Readiness
PARCC Results: Spring 2018 Administrations Prospect Park School September 11, 2018

2. PARCC Expectations Students taking PARCC can score in 5 categories:
Level 1: Did Not Yet Meet Expectations
Level 2 Partially Met Expectations
Level 3 Approached Expectations
Level 4 Met Expectations
Level 5 Exceeded Expectations
Students who score in levels 4 and 5 are considered profient.
Parents, guardians and community members who would like to know more about PARCC should visit the Department of Education website

3. Difference between number of students tested in 2017 and 2018
Comparison of Prospect Park’s Number of Students Tested Spring 2017 & Spring 2018 PARCC Administrations English Language Arts/Literacy
Grade
Students Tested 2018
Students Tested 2017
Difference between number of students tested in 2017 and 2018 3 88
108
-20 4 97
105 -8 5
102 +5 6
103 89
+14 7 90 +2 8 82 +6 9
N/A 10
11*
TOTAL
568
569
-11
Note: “Students Tested” represents individual valid test scores for English Language Arts/Literacy.

4. Difference between number of students tested in 2017 and 2018
Comparison of Prospect Park’s Number of Students Tested Spring 2017 & Spring 2018 PARCC Administrations Mathematics
Grade
Students Tested 2018
Students Tested 2017
Difference between number of students tested in 2017 and 2018 3 88
108
-20 4
104
107 -3 5
103 97 +6 6 90
+14 7 91 +1 8* 80 74
Algebra I 9 8
Algebra II
N/A
Geometry
TOTAL
579
574
5+5
*Some students in grade 8 participated in the PARCC Algebra I assessment in place of the 8th grade Math assessment. Thus, PARCC Math 8 outcomes are not representative of grade 8 performance as a whole.
Notes: “Students Tested” represents individual valid test scores for Mathematics.

5. Change in Level 4 and 5 2016 to 2018**
Comparison of Prospect Park’s Spring 2016, Spring 2017 & Spring 2018 PARCC Administrations English Language Arts/Literacy - District Percentages
Grade
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Change in Level 1 and to 2018
Change in Level 4 and to 2018** 3
15.7 25
29.5
25.5
16.7
20.5
33.3
25.9
30.7
31.5
19.3 .9 + - 4 9
18.1
5.2
23.6
22.9
23.7
30.3
32.4
30.9
24.8 34
5.6
1.9
6.2 5
8.8
13.4
13.7
17.6
17.5
23.5
41.8 33
30.4
28.6 32
3.3
4.1 6
10.7
6.7 19
20.2
27.2
46.1
36.9
40.5
25.8
20.4
1.2
1.1
4.9 7
12.5
8.9
18.2
22.2
22.7
31.1
31.8 8
8.2
14.8
10.6
29.7
22.4 23 17
49.4
16.2
46.6
9.4
3.4
Notes: Data shown is preliminary. Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding.

6. Comparison of Prospect Park’s Spring 2016, Spring 2017 & Spring 2018 PARCC Administrations English Language Arts/Literacy - District Percentages

7. Comparison of Prospect Park’s Spring 2016, Spring 2017 & Spring 2018 PARCC Administrations English Language Arts/Literacy - Sub Group Percentages (Hispanic or Latino)
Grade
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level 3
17.1
29.1
26.7
27.1
17.7
16.7
31.4
22.8 35
24.3
21.7
1.3 4
7.7
15.3 7
23.1
20.8
25.4
30.8
37.5
28.2
33.8
23.6
32.4
4.6
2.8
8.5 5
8.7 10
12.9
20.3 20
47.8
35.7
32.9
34.3
2.9 6
7.9
7.6
10.5
17.5
18.2
27.6
34.9
51.5
35.5
38.1
21.2
22.4
1.6
1.5
3.9
8.6
16.9
9.1
20.7
21.5
24.2 31
27.7
30.3
34.5
24.6
31.8
5.2
9.2
4.5 8
8.9
9.3
12.1
10.7
22.2
26.8
25.9
44.6
38.9
45.5
3.7
**Level 4 and Level 5 is an indication a student is on pace to be college and career ready.
Notes: Data shown is preliminary. Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding.

8. Comparison of Prospect Park’s Spring 2016, Spring 2017 & Spring 2018 PARCC Administrations English Language Arts/Literacy - Sub Group Percentages (Black or African American)
Grade
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level 3
18.8
12.5
53.5 25
26.7
31.3 50 20 4
23.5
7.7
23.1
35.7
38.5
28.6 5
8.3
16.7
13.3 6 30
6.7 10
46.7 40 7
27.8
21.4
5.6
22.2 8
11.8
31.6
17.6
21.1
5.3
70.6
36.8
**Level 4 and Level 5 is an indication a student is on pace to be college and career ready.
Notes: Data shown is preliminary. Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding.

9. Comparison of Prospect Park’s Spring 2016, Spring 2017 & Spring 2018 PARCC Administrations English Language Arts/Literacy - Sub Group Percentages (White)
Grade
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level 3
8.3 25
16.7
41.7
12.5
33.3
62.5 4
22.2
23.1 50 22
30.8 5
14.3 30
18.2 20
27.3
28.6 40
57.1 10 6
37.5
44.4 7
11.1 8
42.9
**Level 4 and Level 5 is an indication a student is on pace to be college and career ready.
Notes: Data shown is preliminary. Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding.

10. Comparison of Prospect Park’s Spring 2016, Spring 2017 & Spring 2018 PARCC Administrations English Language Arts/Literacy - Sub Group Percentages (Economic Disadvantage)
Grade
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level 3
13.3
22.1
27.1
26.5
15.6
20.3
38.6
35.6
21.7
24.7
16.9
1.3 4 11
17..1
4.5
23.3 22
24.2
30.1 39
30.3
28.8
31.8
6.8
9.1 5
10.6
13.9
13.6
18.2 19
23.5
42.4
30.4
34.6
27.3
32.9
28.4
1.5
3.8 6
11.5
9.7
9.8 23
22.6 28
24.6
31.7
36.6 41 29
20.7
1.6
4.9 7
14.9 20
12.1
24.3
19.7
29.1
25.8
34.8
8.1
5.5
7.6 8
18.5
16.4
7.3
23.6
12.7
49.1
35.4
47.3
10.9
3.1
3.6
**Level 4 and Level 5 is an indication a student is on pace to be college and career ready.
Notes: Data shown is preliminary. Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding.

11. Comparison of Prospect Park’s Spring 2016, Spring 2017 & Spring 2018 PARCC Administrations English Language Arts/Literacy - Sub Group Percentages (IEP Students)
Grade
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level 3
44.4
69.2
71.4
33.3
15.4
21.4
22.2
7.1 4 30 50 25 40
58.3 10
16.7 5
41.7
35.7
5.6 6
46.7
30.8
38.5
6.7 7
52.9
35.3
11.8
25.5
8.3 8
53.3
61.5
29.4
29.3
5.9
7.7
**Level 4 and Level 5 is an indication a student is on pace to be college and career ready.
Notes: Data shown is preliminary. Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding.

12. Comparison of Prospect Park’s Spring 2016, Spring 2017 & Spring 2018 PARCC Administrations English Language Arts/Literacy - Sub Group Percentages (ELL Students)
Grade
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level 3
N/A
100 4 20 40 5 25 75 6 60 7 70 10 8
66.7
33.3
*NA- data was suppressed due to the amount of students tested in that year.

13. Change in Level 4 and 5 2016 to 2018**
Comparison of Prospect Park’s Spring 2016, Spring 2017 & Spring 2018 PARCC Administrations Mathematics - District Percentages
Grade
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Change in Level 1 and to 2018
Change in Level 4 and to 2018** 3
21.2
15.7
18.2
41.3
30.6
28.4
27.9
27.8
9.6
23.1
20.5
2.8 - + 4
21.7
12.1
16.5
32.6
40.2 34
29.3
37.4
22.3
14.1
10.3
26.2
2.2 1 5
16.3
24.8
27.2
34.3
42.7
45.7
28.6
8.7
11.4
2.9 6
16.7
23.3
22.1
31.0
28.9
35.6
33.3
31.1
29.8 19
11.5 7
14.4
22.2
3.3
38.9
32.2
40.7
17.8 20
18.7
1.1 -- 8*
24.7
15.9
23.8
16.9
20.7
22.5
18.3
36.3
33.8
4.9
1.3
ALG I /
11.1
100
88.9
*Approximately 30,000 New Jersey students in grade 8 participated in the PARCC Algebra I assessment. Thus, PARCC Math 8 outcomes are not representative of grade 8 performance as a whole. **Level 4 and Level 5 is an indication a student is on pace to be college and career ready.
Notes: Data shown is preliminary. Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding.
ALG 1 Is Algebra 1; GEO is Geometry; ALG II is Algebra 2.

14. Comparison of Prospect Park’s Spring 2016, Spring 2017 & Spring 2018 PARCC Administrations Mathematics - District Percentages

15. Comparison of Prospect Park’s Spring 2016, Spring 2017 & Spring 2018 PARCC Administrations Mathematics - Sub Group Percentages (Hispanic or Latino)
Grade
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level 3
18.3
17.7 15
43.7
27.8 25
23.9
30.4 40
14.1
22.8 20
1.3 4
6.8
18.2
34.3
44.6
35.1
29.9
37.8
20.8 9
10.8
24.7 5
15.9
25.6
31.9
38.5
46.5
44.9
24.4
28.2
7.2
10.3
1.4 6
17.5
7.6
22.1
34.9
36.4
31.7
33.3
32.5
21.2
7.8 7
10.2
20.9
4.5
30.5
37.3
45.8
40.3
13.6
14.9
17.9
1.5 8*
8.9
16.9 21
10.7
21.5
24.2
26.8
27.7
24.6
12.9
9.2
1.6
ALG I
N/A
100 80
*Approximately 30,000 New Jersey students in grade 8 participated in the PARCC Algebra I assessment. Thus, PARCC Math 8 outcomes are not representative of grade 8 performance as a whole. **Level 4 and Level 5 is an indication a student is on pace to be college and career ready.
Notes: Data shown is preliminary. Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding.
ALG 1 Is Algebra 1; GEO is Geometry; ALG II is Algebra 2.

16. Comparison of Prospect Park’s Spring 2016, Spring 2017 & Spring 2018 PARCC Administrations Mathematics - Sub Group Percentages (Black or African American)
Grade
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level 3
31.3
12.5 40
33.3
37.5 50 20 25
6.7 4
15.4
7.1
38.5
23.1
28.6
14.3 5 30
26.7 10
46.7 6
35.7
21.4 60
13.3 7
27.8
27.3
47.6
5.6
18.2
22.2
16.7 8*
11.8
47.1
17.6
23.5
70.6
ALG I
N/A
100
*Approximately 30,000 New Jersey students in grade 8 participated in the PARCC Algebra I assessment. Thus, PARCC Math 8 outcomes are not representative of grade 8 performance as a whole. **Level 4 and Level 5 is an indication a student is on pace to be college and career ready.
Notes: Data shown is preliminary. Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding.
ALG 1 Is Algebra 1; GEO is Geometry; ALG II is Algebra 2.

17. Comparison of Prospect Park’s Spring 2016, Spring 2017 & Spring 2018 PARCC Administrations Mathematics - Sub Group Percentages (White)
Grade
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level 3
15.4
12.5
38.5 25
46.2
37.5 50 4 20
23.1 40
53.8
7.7 5 30
27.3
36.4 10
9.1 6
33.3
16.7
11.1
22.2 7 8*
14.3
28.6
42.9
ALG I
N/A
100
*Approximately 30,000 New Jersey students in grade 8 participated in the PARCC Algebra I assessment. Thus, PARCC Math 8 outcomes are not representative of grade 8 performance as a whole. **Level 4 and Level 5 is an indication a student is on pace to be college and career ready.
Notes: Data shown is preliminary. Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding.
ALG 1 Is Algebra 1; GEO is Geometry; ALG II is Algebra 2.

18. Comparison of Prospect Park’s Spring 2016, Spring 2017 & Spring 2018 PARCC Administrations Mathematics - Sub Group Percentages (Economic Disadvantage)
Grade
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level 3
21.4
11.7
18.6
41.7
29.9
32.2
26.2
28.8
10.7 26
20.3
2.6 4
9.8
18.8
36.5
39.0
30.4
27.0
42.7
21.7
14.9
8.5
27.5
1.4 5
19.4
21.3
26.9
36.3
41.8
11.9 15 6
19.7 23
23.2
31.1
35.4
36.1
32.8 28
13.1 18
12.2
1.2 7 16 25
4.5 32
38.5 36
32.1
37.3
14.7
17.9
22.4
1.3 8*
35.6
30.5 24
19.1
38.3
15.3
ALG I
N/A 20
100 80
*Approximately 30,000 New Jersey students in grade 8 participated in the PARCC Algebra I assessment. Thus, PARCC Math 8 outcomes are not representative of grade 8 performance as a whole. **Level 4 and Level 5 is an indication a student is on pace to be college and career ready.
Notes: Data shown is preliminary. Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding.
ALG 1 Is Algebra 1; GEO is Geometry; ALG II is Algebra 2.

19. Comparison of Prospect Park’s Spring 2016, Spring 2017 & Spring 2018 PARCC Administrations Mathematics - Sub Group Percentages (IEP Students)
Grade
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level 3
55.6
30.8
71.4
33.3
46.2
28.6
5.6
7.7
15.4 4 70 40 25 20 55
58.3 10 5
8.3 50
14.3
7.1
16.7 6
66.7
53.8
69.2
26.7
23.1
6.7 7
82.4
44.4
11.8 75
5.9 8*
35.3 80
76.9
29.4
17.6
ALG I
N/A
*Approximately 30,000 New Jersey students in grade 8 participated in the PARCC Algebra I assessment. Thus, PARCC Math 8 outcomes are not representative of grade 8 performance as a whole. **Level 4 and Level 5 is an indication a student is on pace to be college and career ready.
Notes: Data shown is preliminary. Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding.
ALG 1 Is Algebra 1; GEO is Geometry; ALG II is Algebra 2.

20. Comparison of Prospect Park’s Spring 2016, Spring 2017 & Spring 2018 PARCC Administrations Mathematics - Sub Group Percentages (ELL Students)
Grade
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level 3
N/A 40 60 4
27.3
36.4
9.1 5 6
45.5 7
63.6
18.2 8* 50 25
ALG I
*Approximately 30,000 New Jersey students in grade 8 participated in the PARCC Algebra I assessment. Thus, PARCC Math 8 outcomes are not representative of grade 8 performance as a whole. **Level 4 and Level 5 is an indication a student is on pace to be college and career ready.
Notes: Data shown is preliminary. Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding.
ALG 1 Is Algebra 1; GEO is Geometry; ALG II is Algebra 2.

21. Comparison of Prospect Park’s to 2018 Spring PARCC Administrations English Language Arts/Literacy – Percentage Changes
Grade
Levels 1 & 2
District
Trend
State
Level 3
Levels 4 & 5
District Trend 3 +
8.8 -
2.4%
2.6
1.6%
6.2
4.1% 4
3.7
1.8% .6
2.7%
3.1
4.5% 5
10.8
1.9%
11.4
2.9% .5
4.7% 6
8.2
1.7%
8.3
2.2%
16.5
3.9% 7
1.9
3.3%
8.4
3.1%
6.5
6.3% 8
14.2
5.4
5.2%
Notes: Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding.
The plus sign (+) indicates an increase of the % change from the previous year where a minus sign (-) arrow shows a decrease of the % change from the previous year.

22. Comparison of Prospect Park’s to 2018 Spring PARCC Administrations Mathematics – Percentage Changes
Grade
Levels 1 & 2
District
Trend
State
Level 3
Levels 4 & 5
District Trend 3 -
15.9
0.7% +
5.1
0.6%
10.9
1.3% 4
3.5
2.2% 7
0.5%
2.8% 5
24.3
0.2%
18.5
1.5%
5.8
1.6% 6 10
1.2%
6.5
1.5
1.1%
1.8
3.7%
0.2
4.7% 8
4.6
2.1%
11.6
0.4%
16.2
2.6%
Algebra I* NA
4.1%
1.1
4.6%
*Some students in grade 8 participated in the PARCC Algebra I assessment in place of the 8th grade Math assessment. Thus, PARCC Math 8 outcomes are not representative of grade 8 performance as a whole.
Notes: Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding.
- The plus sign (+) indicates an increase of the % change from the previous year where a minus sign (-) arrow shows a decrease of the % change from the previous year.

23. Comparison of Prospect Park’s Spring 2018 PARCC Administrations Mathematics to New Jersey - Percentages for 2018
Grade
Level 1, District
Level 1, State
Level 2, District
Level 2, State
Level 3, District
Level 3, State
Level 4, District
Level 4, State
Level 5, District
Level 5, State 3
18.2
8.0
28.4
15.3 33
23.7
20.5
37.8
15.2 4
16.5
7.5 34
16.8
22.3
26.3
26.2
41.8
7.6 5
27.2
42.7
17.0
26.7
2.9
38.5
10.4 6
22.1
8.5
35.6
20.1
29.8
27.9
11.5
7.9 7
3.3
7.7
37.4
20.4
40.7
28.6
18.7
36.0
7.4 8*
23.8
22.0
22.5
22.7
36.3
27.1
16.3
1.0
Algebra I
11.3
18.6
11.1
24.3
88.9
39.3
6.5
Algebra II
N/A
31.0
22.4
18.0
24.6
4.0
Geometry
9.4
31.5
29.6
4.9
*Some students in grade 8 participated in the PARCC Algebra I assessment in place of the 8th grade Math assessment. Thus, PARCC Math 8 outcomes are not representative of grade 8 performance as a whole.
Notes: Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding.

24. Comparison of Prospect Park’s Spring 2018 PARCC Administrations English Language Arts/Literacy to New Jersey Percentages for 2018
Grade
Level 1, District
Level 1, State
Level 2, District
Level 2, State
Level 3, District
Level 3, State
Level 4, District
Level 4, State
Level 5, District
Level 5, State 3
29.5
13.5
20.5
30.7
21.4
19.3
43.5
8.1 4
5.2
7.6
23.7
12.3
30.9
22.1 34
39.1
6.2
18.9 5
13.7
6.9
23.5
12.6
30.4
22.4
32.4
47.2
10.8 6
10.7
27.2
13.6
36.9
24.0
20.4
41.3
4.9
14.9 7
8.9
8.6
22.2
10.2
31.1
18.5
34.1
6.7
28.6 8
14.8
8.7
18.2
11.1 17
19.8
46.6
39.9
3.4
Notes: Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding.

25. Cohort Comparison

26. Cohort Comparison

27. Next Steps- English Language Arts
Use faculty meetings to analyze data, curriculum and instructional practice to see areas in need of improvement
Provide onsite and offsite professional development opportunities K-8 in guided reading and ELA best practices
Rewrite ELA curriculum
Purchase new curriculum resources K-8 in ELA for the school year
Continue to Initiate new reading initiatives K-8 to encourage students to read as developed by the reading specialists
Offer an afterschool program for students who are identified needing Title I services
Continue to use walkthrough data and teacher observations to improve instruction in the area of ELA.
Continued partnership with WIlliam Paterson University providing professional development and Professor in Residence to share evidence based practices

28. Next Steps- Math
Use faculty meetings to analyze data, curriculum and instructional practice to see areas in need of improvement
Provide onsite and offsite professional development opportunities K-8 in guided math and best practices in math instruction
Offer an afterschool program for students
Continue to use walkthrough data and teacher observations to improve instruction in the area of mathematic
Continued partnership with WIlliam Paterson University providing professional development and Professor in Residence to share evidence based practices

29. DLM Spring 2018 Assessment

30. Dynamic Learning Maps (DLM)
What is the DLM Assessment?
Dynamic Learning Maps (DLM)
The alternate assessment for students with the most significant intellectual disabilities in English Language Arts, Mathematics, and Science is called the Dynamic Learning Maps (DLM).
The DLM test specifications and Essential Elements skill statements, used for instruction and assessment, are currently available and accessible via the DLM website.
For information on the DLM, go to the Dynamic Learning Maps New Jersey website.*
*information from