1. The relationship between blastocyst morphology, chromosomal abnormality, and embryo gender 
Samer Alfarawati, M.S., Elpida Fragouli, Ph.D., Pere Colls, Ph.D., John Stevens, M.S., Cristina Gutiérrez-Mateo, Ph.D., William B. Schoolcraft, M.D., Mandy G. Katz-Jaffe, Ph.D., Dagan Wells, Ph.D., F.R.C.Path. 
Fertility and Sterility 
Volume 95, Issue 2, Pages (February 2011)
DOI: /j.fertnstert
Copyright © 2011 American Society for Reproductive Medicine Terms and Conditions

2. Figure 1
Number of whole (dark bars) and partial (light bars) aneuploidies affecting each chromosome.
Fertility and Sterility  , DOI: ( /j.fertnstert )
Copyright © 2011 American Society for Reproductive Medicine Terms and Conditions

3. Figure 2
Blastocyst morphologic grading and the proportion of euploid and aneuploid (divided by type) embryos.
Fertility and Sterility  , DOI: ( /j.fertnstert )
Copyright © 2011 American Society for Reproductive Medicine Terms and Conditions

4. Figure 3
Proportion of male (dark bars) and female (light bars) embryos in each blastocyst development grade.
Fertility and Sterility  , DOI: ( /j.fertnstert )
Copyright © 2011 American Society for Reproductive Medicine Terms and Conditions

5. Figure 4
Comparison of the growth rate for embryos with aneuploidy affecting chromosomes 1–5 (n = 17; dark bars) and embryos with aneuploidy affecting chromosomes 21 or 22 (n = 38; light bars). Embryos not graded for inner cell mass and trophectoderm had a morphologic score of <3.
Fertility and Sterility  , DOI: ( /j.fertnstert )
Copyright © 2011 American Society for Reproductive Medicine Terms and Conditions