Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byLenard Lloyd Modified over 5 years ago
1
Course: CEM Information Systems for Beginners and New Users
Peter Hendry: CEM Consultant Interpreting Feedback from Baseline Tests - Whole School & Individual Student Data Course: CEM Information Systems for Beginners and New Users Day 1 Session 2 Wednesday 17th October 2012
2
To inform professional judgement
To start a conversation
3
USING BASELINE DATA FOR TEACHING AND LEARNING
IF FEEDBACK DATA IS TO BE TRUSTED THEN PROBABLY: The students understood the purpose of the assessments And each student did their best at the time……. As a year group, how able are they? What strengths and weaknesses does the group have? How did each student perform?
4
C B D A Bands, percentiles, standardised scores… Standardised scores
10 5 20 30 1 40 90 95 80 70 99 60 50 25 75
5
National Quartile Ability Bands
6
Alis: year 12 students, two baseline profiles for the same school
Nationally, 25% in each band Comments and potential implications?
8
Band Profile Graph: all MidYIS cohort
A school with a ‘completely average’ intake would have 25% of pupils within each band. Checking this graph each year will give you an immediate overview of your intake. Band D Band A
9
Band D Band A Band D Band A Comments?
11
How might this information be useful?
On another day, with 95% certainty, the score of (+/- 1.1 x 2) would not be higher than = 102.8 would not be lower than – 2.2 = 98.4 How might this information be useful?
13
Using national baseline test scores to Identify Gifted Pupils
Scores over 130 – top 2% nationally Scores over 126 – top 5% nationally Scores over 120 – top 10% nationally Scores over 110 – top 25% nationally
14
Year 7: the ‘top’ students
Perceptual speed and accuracy Proof reading
17
A relatively lower vocabulary score might indicate a difficulty which:
could contribute to under-performance in most, if not all subjects might lead to ‘stressful situations’ may lead to further investigation and subsequent pupil support
19
A relatively low maths score might indicate potential weaknesses in subject areas which require:
numerical skills logical thinking skills such as sequencing CONVERSELY: a high maths score but a low vocab/reading score…….
21
A relatively high non-verbal score might indicate potential strengths in subject areas which require: 3d, and 3d into 2d, visualisation Spatial awareness Understanding images in 2d representing 3d Extracting information from visual images Science, D and T, Art, Geography…… and vice versa
23
A relatively low skills score might indicate potential weaknesses such as:
Speed of processing/working Potential underperformance in test/examination conditions Poor written work (SPG etc.) and vice versa
24
Skills: Proof Reading
25
Skills: Perceptual Speed and Accuracy
27
SEN use of MIDYIS test results
Analysis of baseline test individual skill profiles to indicate potential areas of learning difficulties e.g. If the two lowest scores are the vocabulary and skills section and are, or close to being, statistically significant (see IPR) Then the student might be dyslexic Follow-up with appropriate diagnostic tests…..
29
Sharing data with colleagues: e.g. baseline test data
30
INSIGHT Pupil IPR
31
Maths
32
IPRs in KS3 Levels NATIONAL AVERAGE
35
The code: j: reduces size k: infills m: inverts
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.