Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Comparison of INSTI vs PI

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Comparison of INSTI vs PI"— Presentation transcript:

1 Comparison of INSTI vs PI
ARV-trial.com Comparison of INSTI vs PI FLAMINGO GS ACTG A5257 WAVES ARIA 1

2 ARIA Study: DTG/ABC/3TC QD vs ATV + r + FTC/TDF QD in Women
ARV-trial.com ARIA Study: DTG/ABC/3TC QD vs ATV + r + FTC/TDF QD in Women Design Randomisation* 1 : 1 Open label W48 Women ≥ 18 years ARV-naive HIV RNA > 500 c/mL Any CD4 cell count HLA-B*5701 negative No major resistance-associated mutations Hepatitis B negative N = 248 DTG/ABC/3TC QD N = 247 ATV + r 300/100 mg + FTC/TDF QD * Randomisation was stratified by HIV RNA (≤ or > c/mL) and CD4 (≤ or > 350/mm3) Objective Non inferiority of DTG/ABC/3TC at W48: % HIV RNA < 50 c/mL by intention to treat, snapshot analysis (lower margin of the 2-sided 95% CI for the difference = - 12%, 90% power) ARIA Orrell C. Lancet HIV :e536-46 2

3 ARIA Study: DTG/ABC/3TC QD vs ATV + r + FTC/TDF QD in Women
ARV-trial.com ARIA Study: DTG/ABC/3TC QD vs ATV + r + FTC/TDF QD in Women Baseline characteristics and patient disposition DTG/ABC/3TC N = 248 ATV + r + FTC/TDF N = 247 Mean age, years 38.1 37.8 White / Black / Asian, % 46 / 41 / 9 43 / 44 / 9 AIDS, % 4 HIV RNA (log10 c/mL), median 4.41 4.43 HIV RNA > c/mL, % 28 27 CD4 cell count (/mm3), median 340 350 CD4 < 350 per mm3, % 52 50 Hepatitis C coinfection, % 6 9 Discontinuation by W48, N (%) 42 (17%) 55 (22%) For lack of efficacy, N 5 For adverse event, N 10 18 Lost to follow-up / Withdrew consent, N 11 / 5 13 / 7 Pregnancy, N 8 Protocol deviation/ Investigator decision, N 5 / 1 5 / 0 ARIA Orrell C. Lancet HIV :e536-46 3

4 ARIA Study: DTG/ABC/3TC QD vs ATV + r + FTC/TDF QD in Women
ARV-trial.com ARIA Study: DTG/ABC/3TC QD vs ATV + r + FTC/TDF QD in Women Response to treatment (HIV-1 RNA < 50 c/mL) at week 48, ITT-E By baseline strata DTG/ABC/3TC (N = 248) ATV + r + FTC/TDF (N = 247) 25 50 100 75 81.9 71.3 Adjusted difference (95% CI) = 10.5 % (3.1 ; 17.8) p = 0.005 6 14 Virologic success Virologic non-response % 12 15 No virologic data DTG/ABC/3TC ATV + r + FTC/TDF HIV RNA ≤ 105 c/mL 82.6 74 HIV RNA > 105 c/mL 79.7 63.6 CD4 ≤ 350/mm3 85.4 71.8 CD4 > 350/mm3 78 70.7 Emergence of resistance Confirmed virologic failure (HIV RNA ≥ 400 c/mL): 6 DTG/ABC/3TC vs 4 ATV + r + FTC/TDF Mutations emergence at failure DTG/ABC/3TC, N = 2 (K219K/Q, E138E/G) ATV + r + FTC/TDF, N = 1 (M184V) ARIA Orrell C. Lancet HIV :e536-46 4

5 ARIA Study: DTG/ABC/3TC QD vs ATV + r + FTC/TDF QD in Women
ARV-trial.com ARIA Study: DTG/ABC/3TC QD vs ATV + r + FTC/TDF QD in Women Response to treatment (HIV-1 RNA < 50 c/mL) at W48, per protocol DTG/ABC/3TC (N = 230) ATV + r + FTC/TDF (N = 225) 25 50 100 75 86 76 Adjusted difference (95% CI) = 9.7% (2.6 ; 16.8) p = 0.005 6 11 Virologic success Virologic non-response % 8 13 No virologic data ARIA Orrell C. Lancet HIV :e536-46 5

6 ARIA Study: DTG/ABC/3TC QD vs ATV + r + FTC/TDF QD in Women
ARV-trial.com ARIA Study: DTG/ABC/3TC QD vs ATV + r + FTC/TDF QD in Women Adverse events DTG/ABC/3TC ATV + r + FTC/TDF Grade 2 to 4 adverse events, N (%) 115 (46) 137 (55) Drug-related adverse events (≥ 5% in either arm), N (%) Nausea Diarrhea Dyspepsia Ocular icterus Headache Jaundice 83 (33) 31 (13) 12 (5) 4 (2) 5 (2) 121 (49) 35 (14) 18 (7) 15 (6) 14 (6) 13 (5) Serious adverse events, N (%) 20 (8) Fatal adverse events, N 1 (unrelated) Drug-related serious adverse events, N 3 (1) Discontinuation due to adverse events, N (%) 10 (4) 17 (7) Psychiatric adverse events, N (%) Insomnia Anxiety Depression Suicidal ideation Depressed mood Abnormal dreams 2 (< 1) 9 (4) 7 (3) ARIA Orrell C. Lancet HIV :e536-46 6

7 ARIA Study: DTG/ABC/3TC QD vs ATV + r + FTC/TDF QD in Women
ARV-trial.com ARIA Study: DTG/ABC/3TC QD vs ATV + r + FTC/TDF QD in Women Changes in laboratory parameters at W48 DTG/ABC/3TC N = 248 ATV + r + FTC/TDF N = 247 p ALT ≥ 3 x ULN, % 2 1 case > 20 x ULN Serum creatinine, mean change + 9.29 + 5.86 Urine albumin:creatinine ratio (g/moL), median change - 0.10 0.00 Creatinine phosphokinase, grade 3-4, N 3 1 Total cholesterol: HDL-cholesterol ratio Adjusted mean difference : (95% CI: to 0.101) ns Triglycerides, mmol/L Adjusted mean difference : (95% CI: to 0.107) Bone-related markers, W48: baseline ratio Bone-specific alkaline phosphatase Type I collagen C-telopeptides Osteocalcin Procollagen 1 N-terminal propeptide Vitamin D 1.188 1.257 1.282 1.214 0.987 1.629 1.918 2.039 1.752 1.158 < 0.001 ARIA Orrell C. Lancet HIV :e536-46 7

8 ARIA Study: DTG/ABC/3TC QD vs ATV + r + FTC/TDF QD in Women
ARV-trial.com ARIA Study: DTG/ABC/3TC QD vs ATV + r + FTC/TDF QD in Women Conclusion In treatment-naive women, DTG/ABC/3TC was superior to ATV + r + TDF/FTC at 48 weeks of treatment HIV RNA < 50 c/mL (ITT-E, snapshot): 82% vs 71% Adjusted difference 10.5%, 95% CI: 3.1% to 17.8%, p = 0.005 Difference driven by lower rate of virologic non-response and fewer discontinuations due to adverse events in DTG arm DTG/ABC/3TC had a favorable safety profile compared to ATV + r + TDF/FTC ARIA Orrell C. Lancet HIV :e536-46 8


Download ppt "Comparison of INSTI vs PI"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google