Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Evaluation Training September 4, 2018

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Evaluation Training September 4, 2018"— Presentation transcript:

1 Evaluation Training September 4, 2018

2 Evaluation Components

3 Evaluation Components
PDPs: One related to last year’s evaluations and summary / One related to district goal (Meeting the Needs of All Learners) All PDPs must be submitted through MLP by October 30, 2018.

4 There are many ways to meet the goal of the PDP in all four domains.

5 Evaluation Components
Observations: Your assigned evaluators are in MLP. Teachers participating in the Video Observation Protocol for the first time must attend training. Details are in the After School PD Catalog. There are updated pre- and post-conference questions developed with last year’s DEAC team. You can view them on MLP.

6 Evaluation Components
SGOs: Each teacher needs two SGOs; these will be submitted through MLP.

7 A Student Growth Objective is a long-term academic goal that teachers set for groups of students.
It must be: Specific and measurable Focused on the right content and skills Aligned to state/national standards Based on available prior student learning data Based on growth and achievement Ambitious and feasible

8 Each teacher shall develop, in consultation with his or her supervisor or a principal’s designee, each student growth objective. If the teacher does not agree with the student growth objectives, the principal shall make the final determination. NJAC 6A:10-4.2(e)3

9 Quality Measurement Tools
Assessments used to track progress on SGOs can include national standardized tests, statewide assessments, or common department assessments. Teachers can use measurement tools such as traditional tests, portfolio reviews, or performance assessments.

10 Starting Points Get to know your students from multiple sources of baseline data that may be quantitative, qualitative, or both.

11 Two kinds of SGOs: General SGOs measure the number of students who meet a target score on a single assessment. That target score is based on information you’ve gathered about the students. That target score has to be determined by the time a teacher submits an SGO--and teachers may have different target scores.

12 Two kinds of SGOs: Tiered SGOs also measure performance, but require a closer look at baseline data to determine tiered groups based on starting points.

13 Low 36/65 56% Medium 21/65 32% High 8/65 12% Preparedness
Tiers determined by examining baseline data Preparedness Number of Students Percentage of Students Low 36/65 56% Medium 21/65 32% High 8/65 12% The preparedness groups here were developed by examining different areas of baseline data as shown in the starting points section. It is important to emphasize again that these groups are best developed when using multiple points of data and not just a pretest. This can and should include indicators of future success such as class participation, attendance, etc.

14 Preparedness Tier Exceptional 4 Full 3 Partial 2 Insufficient 1 Low 70
Target score on Final Assessment Objective Attainment Based on Percent (and Numbers) of Students Achieving Final Score Exceptional 4 Full 3 Partial 2 Insufficient 1 Low 70 >85% (31-36) 70-84% (25-30) 55-69% (18-24) <55% (0-17) Medium 80 >85% (19-21) 70-84% (15-18) 55-69% (11-14) <55% (0-10) High 90 >85% (8) 70-84% (6-7) 55-69% (4-5) <55% (0-3)

15 Reviewing the Results Low 70 31 Medium 80 16 High 90 4
Preparedness Group Target Score (%) Number of Students at Target Score Low 70 31 Medium 80 16 High 90 4 This chart shows the performance of students from the illustrative group on their final assessment.

16 Reviewing the Results Preparedness Group Target score on Final Assessment Objective Attainment Based on Percentage (and Numbers) of Students Achieving Final Score Exceptional 4 Full 3 Partial 2 Insufficient 1 Low 70 >85% (31-36) 70-84% (25-30) 55-69% (18-24) <55% (0-17) Medium 80 >85% (19-21) 70-84% (15-18) 55-69% (11-14) <55% (0-10) High 90 >85% (8) 70-84% (6-7) 55-69% (4-5) <55% (0-3) In this chart, the scores from the last slide have been transferred on to the scoring guide. The low group, which makes up 56% of the entire group, scored in the 4 range. The Medium Group scored in the 3 range, and the High group, which only makes up 12% of the class, scored in the 2 range.

17 Other PD Reminders: Visit staffapps.ebnet.org and sign up for other PD opportunities GCN Training #EBEdChat (every day this week and again Sept. 25 at 8PM) EB EdCamp: October 6 EB Nonfiction Book Club: you can register at staffapps under “curriculum”

18


Download ppt "Evaluation Training September 4, 2018"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google