1. doc.: IEEE 802.15-<doc#>
<month year>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
Submission Title: [Resolution for Channelization Comments CID# 627, 628, 631, 632, 634, 635, 636, 639, 640, 666]
Date Submitted: [July 14, 2010]
Source: [Kuor Hsin Chang]
Company: [Elster Solutions]
Address: []
Voice: []
Re: [Comment Resolution for TG4g draft]
Abstract: The presentation provides resolution for some channelization related comments
Purpose: Presented to the g SUN Task Group for consideration and discussion
Notice: This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE P It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein.
Release: The contributor acknowledges and accepts that this contribution becomes the property of IEEE and may be made publicly available by P
<author>, <company>

2. doc.: IEEE 802.15-<doc .....>
<May,2009>
doc.: IEEE <doc .....>
Outline
Comments to be resolved:
CID# 627, 628, 631, 632, 634, 635, 636, 639, 640, 666
Recommend Resolution
Resolution Detail
<author>, <company>

3. Comments & Recommend Resolution
CID# 627:
Comment: The value BandEdge is not defined for the standard defined PHY
Recommend Resolution: Accept in principle
CID# 628:
Comment: The maximum value for NumChan is not defined for the standard defined PHY
CID# 631:
Comment: the value of Bandedge in each frequency band is not defined clearly

4. Comments & Recommend Resolution (Cont’d)
CID# 632:
Comment: Channel separation units is MHz??? It should likely be kHz? How large is the register? What is the granularity?
Resolution: Withdraw
CID# 634:
Comment: For each standard-defined PHY mode and Frequency band, BandEdge and the number of channels shall be specified
Recommend Resolution: Accept in principle
CID# 635:
Comment: Equation 1 is incomplete
Slide 4

5. Comments & Recommend Resolution (Cont’d)
CID# 636:
Comment: (1) shall be clarified whether it should be "= BandEdge+(NumChan+0.5)*ChanSpacing" or "=CenterFreq(Ch. 0)+NumChan*ChanSpacing".
Recommend Resolution: Accept in principle
CID# 639:
Comment: Channel numbering for OFDM is missing.
CID# 640:
Comment: Channel numbering needed for OFDM
CID# 666:
Comment: Channel numbering for the OFDM PHY is missing.
Slide 5

6. Resolution
Change the title of Clause a.3 to “Channel numbering for MRFSK PHY and MR-OFDM PHY”
Change the text “where BandEdge is the start of the frequency band in MHz” to “where BandEdge is the start of the frequency band in MHz as shown in Table 1” on line 4 of page 23
Add “GL is guard band on the lower side of the band, GH is guard band on the higher side of the band” after “…in MHz” on line 4 of page 23. Replace equation (1) on line 9-10 of page 23 with the following equation and text:
ChanCenterFreq = BandEdge + GL + (NumChan + ½) x ChanSpacing, NumChan=0,…, TotalNumChan (1)
For Japanese bands, GL is 0.9 MHz, GH is 0.5 MHz for 200 kHz and 600 kHz Channel Spacing and 0.7 MHz for 400 kHz Channel Spacing. For all other bands, both GL and GH are ChanSep/2. For 2.4 GHz band, GH is 5 MHz. TotalNumChan is the total number of channels for the available frequency band,
TotalNumChan= floor( )
where W is the width of the available band in MHz.
Slide 6

7. Questions?