1. Functional analysis of cryopreserved veins
K.G.M. Brockbank, PhD, T.J. Donovan, MD, S.T. Ruby, MD, J.F. Carpenter, PhD, P.-O. Hagen, PhD, M.A. Woodley, MBA 
Journal of Vascular Surgery 
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages (January 1990)
DOI: / (90)
Copyright © 1990 Society for Vascular Surgery and International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery, North American Chapter Terms and Conditions

2. Fig. 1
Comparison of viable endothelial cell numbers, by the ability to form clones in fresh untreated control (hatched bars) and cryopreserved (solid bars) canine veins. Data are expressed as the mean of n veins. *No significant differences were observed by one-way analysis of variance.
Journal of Vascular Surgery  , DOI: ( / (90) )
Copyright © 1990 Society for Vascular Surgery and International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery, North American Chapter Terms and Conditions

3. Fig. 2
An example of a norepinephrine dose response for cryopreserved (squares) and fresh (circles) saphenous vein. The data are expressed as the percent of maximal contraction obtained in response to increasing molar concentrations of norepinephrine.
Journal of Vascular Surgery  , DOI: ( / (90) )
Copyright © 1990 Society for Vascular Surgery and International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery, North American Chapter Terms and Conditions

4. Fig. 3
Histologic view of a cryopreserved cephalic vein graft after 22 days in the femoral artery. (Hematoxylin and eosin stain; magnification × 250.)
Journal of Vascular Surgery  , DOI: ( / (90) )
Copyright © 1990 Society for Vascular Surgery and International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery, North American Chapter Terms and Conditions