Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Assessing the Water Cycle in Regional Climate Simulation

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Assessing the Water Cycle in Regional Climate Simulation"— Presentation transcript:

1 Assessing the Water Cycle in Regional Climate Simulation
W. J. Gutowski, Jr. Iowa State University with thanks to: F. Otieno, Z. Pan, R. W. Arritt, E. S. Takle SASAS (September 2001)

2 Outline 10-yr RCM simulations Precipitation analysis Error evaluation
Conclusions: Sources of error? SASAS (September 2001)

3 Simulations

4 Simulations

5 Simulation Domain

6 Observations Circulation – NCEP/NCAR reanalysis
Precipitation VEMAP - monthly; 0.5˚ x 0.5˚ Higgins et al. - hourly; 2˚ x 2.5˚ Circulation – NCEP/NCAR reanalysis Precipitable water – NCEP/NCAR reanalysis Runoff - UNH 0.5˚ climatology

7 Outline 10-yr RCM simulations Precipitation analysis Error evaluation
Conclusions: Sources of error? SASAS (September 2001)

8 Diagnoses Bias: average difference Bias Score: intensity “spectrum”
SOM: pattern difference

9 Precip.Bias by Month & Location [mm/d]

10 Season’s Bias by Year ~ south-central US ~
(“Fall” = Sep-Oct-Nov, etc.)

11 Bias Score by Location Threshold = 1 mm/d
(“Score” ~ relative exceeding of threshold)

12 Bias Score by Location Threshold = 2 mm/d
(“Score” ~ relative exceeding of threshold)

13 Bias Score by Location Threshold = 4 mm/d
(“Score” ~ relative exceeding of threshold)

14 Bias Score by Month ~ south-central US ~
(“Score” ~ relative exceeding of threshold)

15 Self-Organizing Maps Set of maps Show characteristic data structures
Trained to distribution of data Give 2-D projection of higher order map space Are approximately continuous

16 SOM: RegCM2 & VEMAP Precipitation

17 SOM: RegCM2 & VEMAP Precipitation
1 2

18 SOM: Major Dimensions 1 “warm” 2 “cold” 0 [mm/mo]

19 SOM: RegCM2 & VEMAP Precipitation

20 SOM: RegCM2 & VEMAP Precipitation

21 SOM Trajectories RegCM VEMAP
J-J-A

22 SOM Trajectories RegCM VEMAP RegCM VEMAP
J-J-A RegCM D-J-F VEMAP D-J-F

23 SOM: Major Dimensions 2 “cold” 0 [mm/mo]

24 Trajectory Separation by Month

25 Outline 10-yr RCM simulations Precipitation analysis Error evaluation
Conclusions: Sources of error? SASAS (September 2001)

26 500 hPa Heights & Bias Sep-Oct-Nov [m]

27 500 hPa Bandpass Variance & Bias
Sep-Oct-Nov [m2]

28 Precipitable Water & Bias
Sep-Oct-Nov [kg-m-2]

29 Simulation Domain

30

31

32 Water Balance Analysis
From terrestrial balance: Evapotranspiration error Observed runoff Model output Precipitation error

33 Water Balance Analysis
From terrestrial balance: Evapotranspiration error Subsurface storage Observed runoff Model output Precipitation error

34 Water Balance Analysis
From atmospheric balance: Vapor convergence error Evapotranspiration error Precipitation error

35 Error: Ten-year average

36 Water Balance Analysis
For Sep-Oct-Nov:

37 Water Balance Analysis
For Sep-Oct-Nov: Plausible values? model’s root-zone storage: => -0.5 mm/d (P-E)m - Ro: => -0.1 mm/d

38 Error: S-O-N average

39 Outline 10-yr RCM simulations Precipitation analysis Error evaluation
Conclusions: Sources of error? SASAS (September 2001)

40 Evapotranspiration error from:
Temperature error? SASAS (September 2001)

41 Daily Max. Temperature RegCM2 Difference VEMAP
[oC]

42 Daily Min. Temperature RegCM2 Difference VEMAP
[oC]

43 Evapotranspiration error from:
Temperature error? Apparently no. Surface moisture error? SASAS (September 2001)

44 The region has substantial wetlands:
SASAS (September 2001)

45 The region has substantial wetlands:
Not resolved by km grid. Large source of water? SASAS (September 2001)

46 Acknowledgments Primary Funding:
U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Additional Support: Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) SASAS (September 2001)

47 EXTRA SLIDES

48 RegCM2 Bias VEMAP JAN JUL - 4 -2 +2 +4 +6 [mm/d]

49

50

51

52

53 SOM Trajectories RegCM VEMAP J-J-A

54 RegCM VEMAP VEMAP RegCM
SOM Trajectories RegCM VEMAP J-J-A VEMAP D-J-F RegCM D-J-F

55 500 hPa Bandpass Variance & Bias
Sep-Oct-Nov Dec-Jan-Feb [m2]

56 500 hPa Bandpass Variance & Bias
Sep-Oct-Nov [m2]

57 500 hPa SOM-weighted ave. & bias
October [m]

58 The region has substantial wetlands:
SASAS (September 2001)

59 …and substantial irrigation:
SASAS (September 2001)

60 Hydrological units boundaries:
SASAS (September 2001)

61 Hydrological units boundaries:


Download ppt "Assessing the Water Cycle in Regional Climate Simulation"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google