1. Scribble PDZ1 preferentially interacts with p‐1 and p‐3 phosphorylated ligands as shown by affinity determinations (MST and ITC), NMR structure, mutational analysis, and GST‐pulldowns and co‐immunoprecipitation experiments
Scribble PDZ1 preferentially interacts with p‐1 and p‐3 phosphorylated ligands as shown by affinity determinations (MST and ITC), NMR structure, mutational analysis, and GST‐pulldowns and co‐immunoprecipitation experiments MST affinity measurements using FITC‐labeled peptides (unphosphorylated, phosphorylated, and phosphomimetic variants) of MCC (p‐1), RPS6KA2 (p‐3), and TANC1 (p‐6). A fixed peptide concentration (25–50 nM) was titrated with varying concentrations of Scribble PDZ1. KD values were determined using thermophoresis and T‐Jump signal for data analysis (n = 3; error bars represent SD). Statistical assessment using ordinary one‐way ANOVA for multiple comparisons confirmed significant differences (P ≤ 0.001) between the affinities for the phosphorylated peptides compared to the unphosphorylated peptides of MCC, RPS6KA2, and TANC1. For the comparison between the wild‐type and phosphomimetic peptides, there were significant differences for the peptides of MCC (P ≤ 0.01) and RPS6KA2 (P ≤ 0.001), but not for TANC1. Insets show representative titrationsRepresentative ITC titrations of Scribble PDZ1 with unphosphorylated and phosphorylated peptides of MCC, RPS6KA2, and MAPK12 (n = 3). Statistical assessment using multiple t‐tests corrected using the Holm–Sidak method for multiple comparisons show a significant difference between the phosphorylated and unphosphorylated MCC (P =  ) and RPS6KA2 (P = 0.0003) peptides.Differences between the thermodynamic parameters of Scribble PDZ1 when binding unphosphorylated or phosphorylated ligands (MCC and RPS6KA2) as determined in (B) (error bars represent SD, n = 3).Overlay of the previously published unliganded structure of Scribble PDZ1 (gray; PDB code 1X5Q) and the here determined NMR structure (blue; PDB code 6ESP) of the protein bound to MKRLTpSTRL‐coo‐ (peptide not shown). The canonical PDZ binding grove is indicated by a dotted orange line.Structure of the phosphopeptide‐bound Scribble PDZ1 showing three positively charged residues (K746, R762, and R801) surrounding the peptide binding pocket.Left panel: Equilibrium binding constants for the binding between Scribble PDZ1 wild type and mutants (K746A, R762A, and R801A) and RPS6KA2 (unphosphorylated and phosphorylated) as determined through ITC titrations (n = 3). Right panel: Changes in the thermodynamic parameters upon mutation (ΔΔHmutation and −TΔΔSmutation) as determined through ITC (error bars represent SD, n = 3).Section of the 15N‐1H HSQC spectra of ligand‐free wild‐type Scribble PDZ1 (red) and the protein bound to the phospho‐RPS6KA2 peptide (green), together with the spectra of the ligand‐free R762A mutant (magenta) and the mutant bound to phospho‐RPS6KA2 (cyan). Note that residue 762 experiences chemical shift perturbation only in the wild‐type Scribble PDZ1.Slice of the 15N‐1H HSQC spectra showing the R733 or R762A residue of the wild‐type or mutant proteins. R733 is critical for mediating the carboxylate at the C‐terminus, and its position does not change in the wild‐type‐bound or the R762A‐bound form, showing that the carboxylate is still making the important interaction.GST‐pulldown of full‐length Flag‐tagged RPS6KA2 wild type and mutants (S730A and S730E) and a truncated version (S730Δ) over‐expressed in HEK293T cells with GST‐tagged Scribble PDZ1. Detection was performed using an anti‐Flag antibody.Co‐IPs of GFP‐tagged full‐length Scribble with Flag‐tagged full‐length RPS6KA2 constructs as indicated. Detection was performed using an anti‐Flag antibody and an anti‐GFP antibody.GST‐pulldown of full‐length Flag‐tagged RPS6KA1 wild type and a truncated version of the protein (S732Δ). Detection was performed using an anti‐Flag antibody. Source data are available online for this figure.
Gustav N Sundell et al. Mol Syst Biol 2018;14:e8129
© as stated in the article, figure or figure legend