1. Grading Criteria Total 4 points for three parts:
Number and relevance of Pros+Cons
2 points
Number, relevance and clarity of References
1.5 points
Diversities of References
0.5 points

2. Examples of Good Formats
Advantages
Quoted Resource
Reference
Type of Reference
Respond quickly to changing requirements due to refactoring and simple design
“Refactoring helps developers respond quickly to changing requirements”
S.Smith, S. Stoecklin, “What We Can Learn From Extreme Programming”, The journal of Computing in Small Colleges Vol. 17 Iss.2, Dec, 2001, pp
Book
Promotes respect among peers working on the project
“There is respect for other team members because, even with short…”
Website …

3. Examples of Good Formats (cont.)
Advantages
Promotes respect among peers working on the project.
“There is respect for other team members because, even with short…”
Reference: A1 …
Disadvantages
Lack of documentation may cause problem in personnel turnover
“Although the extreme programming methodology claims that…”
Reference: D1
References
Website
A1.
Conference Paper
D1. Fruhling, A., et al. “Experiences with Extreme Programming in Telehealth: Developing and Implementing a Biosecurity Health Care Application”, Proceedings of the 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii, 2005.

4. Diversity of Resources
Book
Course slides
Conference paper
Journal
White paper
Presentations
Other websites …

5. Good Practices
In each bullet point, clear indicate advantages/disadvantages with quoted text supporting it
Classifying and numbering references
Give grader a easier life
Follow conference’s format of reference
E.g., IEEE, ACM…

6. Bad Practices Not an insightful bullet point
Only list quoted text from references
Missing references
Reference in wrong format
E.g., [John’s thoughts on XP]
Paper? Book?… Not clear at all