2. REVIEW GROUP 178 – AN ALTERNATE SOLUTION
Stefan Leedham
25th January 2008

3. WHAT ARE THE ISSUES? Appropriateness of exposing I&C Sites to RbD
Do not fit domestic profile
Does not align with supply licence or GDN reporting requirements
Requires I&C Shippers to have mechanisms in place to cope with RbD
Appropriateness of exposing large domestic sites to individual reconciliation?
Fit domestic profile
Impact of mis-allocation greater
Ability of AQ and so RbD to respond to a step change in consumption
All domestic suppliers also have I&C portfolio and so will be exposed to individual meter reconciliation

4. SOLUTIONS One Way Street Threshold Approach
Move all SSP I&C Sites into LSP market
Leave LSP Domestic sites where they are
Threshold Approach
Move all SSP I&C Sites into LSP market & rename I&C
Move all LSP Domestic sites into SSP market & rename domestic
All I&C Sites exposed to individual meter point reconciliation
All domestic sites less than 73,200kWh exposed to RbD & all domestic sites greater than 73,200kWh individually reconcilied

5. COMMENTS
Both solutions need a better definition of “I&C” and “domestic” than currently exists

6. THANK YOU