1. Consensus Building in Palliative Care: A Europe-Wide Delphi Study on Common Understandings and Conceptual Differences 
Saskia Jünger, Dr rer medic, Sheila Payne, BA (Hons), RN, DipN, PhD, Cpsychol, Sarah Brearley, PhD, Verena Ploenes, MD, Lukas Radbruch, MD 
Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 
Volume 44, Issue 2, Pages (August 2012)
DOI: /j.jpainsymman
Copyright © 2012 U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee Terms and Conditions

2. Fig. 1
Key dimensions for the development of norms for palliative care in Europe.
Journal of Pain and Symptom Management  , DOI: ( /j.jpainsymman )
Copyright © 2012 U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee Terms and Conditions

3. Fig. 2
Stages of the Delphi process. EAPC=European Association for Palliative Care.
Journal of Pain and Symptom Management  , DOI: ( /j.jpainsymman )
Copyright © 2012 U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee Terms and Conditions

4. Fig. 3
Percentage of items with very high, high, or moderate/low agreement and consensus for the different key areas of palliative care in Round I (171 statements; n=81). pc = palliative care. ∗Percentage of items per section.
Journal of Pain and Symptom Management  , DOI: ( /j.jpainsymman )
Copyright © 2012 U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee Terms and Conditions

5. Fig. 4
Percentage of items with very high, high, or moderate/low agreement and consensus for the different key areas of palliative care in Round II (122 statements; n=54). pc = palliative care. ∗Percentage of items per section.
Journal of Pain and Symptom Management  , DOI: ( /j.jpainsymman )
Copyright © 2012 U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee Terms and Conditions

6. Fig. 5
Shift of consensus from Round I to Round II. pc = palliative care. ∗Percentage of items per section.
Journal of Pain and Symptom Management  , DOI: ( /j.jpainsymman )
Copyright © 2012 U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee Terms and Conditions