1. Athletic Profile of Highly Accomplished Boulderers
Jamie H. Macdonald, PhD, Nigel Callender, BSc 
Wilderness & Environmental Medicine 
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (June 2011)
DOI: /j.wem
Copyright © 2011 Wilderness Medical Society Terms and Conditions

2. Figure 1
Strength dominant side, (relative to body mass) of highly accomplished boulderers and non-climbing controls. * Statistically significant difference between groups by independent t-test. Fingers: t(22) = 4.248, p = 0.000, d = The Bonferroni adjusted alpha level for the 2 finger strength measures = Hand: t(22) = 2.394, p = 0.026, d = The Bonferroni adjusted alpha level for the 3 handgrip tests =
Wilderness & Environmental Medicine  , DOI: ( /j.wem )
Copyright © 2011 Wilderness Medical Society Terms and Conditions

3. Figure 2
Resistance to fatigue in highly accomplished boulderers and non-climbing controls. * Significant main effect of time by analysis of variance (F(10,200) = , p = 0.000, η2 = 0.679). There was also a trend for a main effect of group (F(1,20) = 4.436, p = 0.048, η2 = 0.182), but there was no significant interaction (F(10,200) = 0.382, p = 0.953, η2 = 0.019). The Bonferroni adjusted alpha level for the fatigue measures =
Wilderness & Environmental Medicine  , DOI: ( /j.wem )
Copyright © 2011 Wilderness Medical Society Terms and Conditions