Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byAdele Maxwell Modified over 5 years ago
1
Long-term results of venous valve reconstruction: A four- to twenty-one—year follow-up
Elna M. Masuda, MD, Robert L. Kistner, MD Journal of Vascular Surgery Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages (March 1994) DOI: /S (94) Copyright © 1994 Society for Vascular Surgery and International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery, North American Chapter Terms and Conditions
2
Fig. 1 Cumulative clinical success rate of achieving class 0 or 1 result after venous valve reconstruction for all limbs. Number in parentheses represent total limbs at risk for each time interval. Journal of Vascular Surgery , DOI: ( /S (94) ) Copyright © 1994 Society for Vascular Surgery and International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery, North American Chapter Terms and Conditions
3
Fig. 2 Life-table curve of cumulative ulcer-free rate among those limbs operated for ulceration. Journal of Vascular Surgery , DOI: ( /S (94) ) Copyright © 1994 Society for Vascular Surgery and International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery, North American Chapter Terms and Conditions
4
Fig. 3 Fate of limbs operated for ulceration (n = 29), grouped according to absence or presence of recurrent ulcer(s) and number of recurrent ulcer events. Time and frequency of each ulcer recurrence is represented by hatch mark(s). Journal of Vascular Surgery , DOI: ( /S (94) ) Copyright © 1994 Society for Vascular Surgery and International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery, North American Chapter Terms and Conditions
5
Fig. 4 Cumulative clinical success rate based on cause of chronic venous insufficiency. Significant difference is found for PVI versus PTS (p = 0.029). No significant difference is identified between PVI-PTS versus PVI or PTS (p > 0.05). Journal of Vascular Surgery , DOI: ( /S (94) ) Copyright © 1994 Society for Vascular Surgery and International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery, North American Chapter Terms and Conditions
6
Fig. 5 Cumulative clinical success rate based on type of valve reconstruction procedure. "Other operations" refer to valve transpositions (n = 14), superficial femoral vein valve transplantations (n = 2), and combined valve repair and transposition procedures (n = 3). Significant difference exists between valve repair versus other operations (p = 0.02). Journal of Vascular Surgery , DOI: ( /S (94) ) Copyright © 1994 Society for Vascular Surgery and International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery, North American Chapter Terms and Conditions
7
Fig. 6 Evaluation of valve function by postoperative imaging studies (duplex scan or descending venography) performed on each limb over time. These results are compared with initial results of valve competency assessed during operation at completion of procedure, by strip test. (Each line represents one extremity over time.) A, Postoperative imaging results for class 0 (n = 17); B, postoperative imaging results for class 1 (n = 12); C, postoperative imaging results for classes 2 (n = 1) and 3 (n = 19). Journal of Vascular Surgery , DOI: ( /S (94) ) Copyright © 1994 Society for Vascular Surgery and International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery, North American Chapter Terms and Conditions
8
Fig. 6 Evaluation of valve function by postoperative imaging studies (duplex scan or descending venography) performed on each limb over time. These results are compared with initial results of valve competency assessed during operation at completion of procedure, by strip test. (Each line represents one extremity over time.) A, Postoperative imaging results for class 0 (n = 17); B, postoperative imaging results for class 1 (n = 12); C, postoperative imaging results for classes 2 (n = 1) and 3 (n = 19). Journal of Vascular Surgery , DOI: ( /S (94) ) Copyright © 1994 Society for Vascular Surgery and International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery, North American Chapter Terms and Conditions
9
Fig. 6 Evaluation of valve function by postoperative imaging studies (duplex scan or descending venography) performed on each limb over time. These results are compared with initial results of valve competency assessed during operation at completion of procedure, by strip test. (Each line represents one extremity over time.) A, Postoperative imaging results for class 0 (n = 17); B, postoperative imaging results for class 1 (n = 12); C, postoperative imaging results for classes 2 (n = 1) and 3 (n = 19). Journal of Vascular Surgery , DOI: ( /S (94) ) Copyright © 1994 Society for Vascular Surgery and International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery, North American Chapter Terms and Conditions
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.