Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byMarika Leppänen Modified over 5 years ago
1
Galactic Astronomy 銀河物理学特論 I Lecture 3-3: Stellar mass function of galaxies Seminar: Perez-Gonzalez et al. 2008, ApJ, 675, 234 Lecture: 2012/01/16
2
Observed magnitude and stellar mass, current stellar mass limit of deep surveys:
Marchesini et al. 2009, ApJ, 701, 1765,
3
Evolution of Stellar Mass Function of Galaxies : Uncertainty due to stellar population synthesis model Kajisawa et al. 2009, ApJ, 702, 1393
4
Evolution of Stellar Mass Function of Galaxies :
Kajisawa et al. 2009, ApJ, 702, 1393 Marchesini et al. 2009, ApJ, 701, 1765
5
Evolution of stellar mass density as a function of z:
Kajisawa et al. 2009, ApJ, 702, 1393 Marchesini et al. 2009, ApJ, 701, 1765
6
Evolution of stellar mass density as a function of z and stellar mass
2019/6/4 Evolution of stellar mass density as a function of z and stellar mass Marchesini et al. 2009, ApJ, 701, 1765, Perez-Gonzalez et al. 2008, ApJ, 675, 234
7
Luminosity function compared with semi-analytic models
Bower 2008
8
Luminosity function compared with semi-analytic models
Based on simple Cold-Dark-Matter galaxy formation model, more massive galaxies expected than observed. Formation of massive galaxies needs to be stopped with feed-back from AGNs etc. Without AGN feedback With AGN feedback Without AGN feedback With AGN feedback Bower et al. 2006, MNRAS, 370, 645
9
Stellar mass function compared with semi-analytic models
Three semi-analytic models with AGN feedback etc. Bower et al. 2011, arXiv:
10
The relation between stellar mass and star formation rate:
Daddi et al. 2007, ApJ, 670, 156
11
The relation between stellar mass and star formation rate:
Comparison with semi-analytic models Z=0 observation (contour) vs. Three semi-analytic models with AGN feedback etc. Bower et al. 2011, arXiv:
12
2019/6/4 Evolution of stellar mass density as a function of z and stellar mass, compared with the estimated growth curve of SMBHs Perez-Gonzalez et al. 2008, ApJ, 675, 234 Marconi et al. 2004, MNRAS, 351, 169 Single Eddington ratio assumed, etc.
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.