1. A comparative study of two extraction methods routinely used for DNA recovery from simulated post coital samples 
T. Mudariki, H. Pallikarana-Tirumala, L. Ives, S. Hadi, W. Goodwin 
Forensic Science International: Genetics Supplement Series 
Volume 4, Issue 1, Pages e194-e195 (January 2013)
DOI: /j.fsigss
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd Terms and Conditions

2. Fig. 1
Comparison of DNA concentrations from samples extracted using Differex™ and QIAamp® measured using Nanodrop Very similar results were obtained when using Quantifiler®.
Forensic Science International: Genetics Supplement Series 2013 4, e194-e195DOI: ( /j.fsigss )
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd Terms and Conditions

3. Fig. 2
Percentage of profiles falling into different classifications. Samples extracted with QIAamp® and Differex™ and profiled using AmpFℓSTR® SGM Plus® and PowerPlex® ESI 17.
Forensic Science International: Genetics Supplement Series 2013 4, e194-e195DOI: ( /j.fsigss )
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd Terms and Conditions