1. Yesterday’s entertainment
Decided to remove Denial of Service threats, and related assets, objectives, etc., from the PPs
DoS will remain in the P2600 best practices and mitigation techniques
Decided to not consider the external network environment as a TOE asset, and to remove threats against that asset
Instead, use OSPs as the basis for security objectives related to the TOE doing no harm to external devices
Decided to use the proposed Family of PPs approach instead of the proposed Packages approach
Decided to use the organization/content of PPs that makes it possible to apply the FPP to any combination of Print, Scan, Copy, and Fax, with or without network, etc.

2. Ideas for roundtable discussion
How to get assurances from schemes (US, JP, others?) that our FPP approach is acceptable
Would they certify this kind of FPP and conforming STs?
If the FPP was certified by another scheme, would they be comfortable certify conforming STs?
How to approach the problem of getting the FPPs evaluated by a CC lab and the P2600.* draft standards approved by the IEEE standards process?
Some comments/corrections will be made by different reviewing bodies and will need to be merged into a new draft
How to avoid (or negotiate away) conflicting comments?
How to minimize the number of iterations

3. Ideas for roundtable discussion(2)
How to reward/acknowledge organizations that fund certification of the FPPs?
Funding is voluntary
We can have some acknowledgment of organizations in the front matter of IEEE standards that contain each of the four FPPs
We could also have some acknowledgment in the front matter of FPPs as they are published for the CC community (with CC front matter instead of IEEE front matter)
Strategies for dealing with NIAP CCEVS, IPA, or other schemes

4. Ideas for roundtable discussion(3)
Which SFRs might be used to fulfill the objective that some data on hard disks must be protected from being salvaged from hard disks that are removed from the TOE
We already know about FDP_RIP for dereferenced data
We assume that encryption would be used, but FCS_ class does not specify what will be encrypted, it only specifies how crypto is handled
Even if we assume crypto is used in practice, can we do so without requiring cryptography? Or at least without using FCS_ class?

5. Ideas for roundtable discussion(4)
Which SFRs might be used to fulfill the objective of preventing data from passing through the TOE (in one interface and out another) that hasn’t been mediated by the TSF?
We have a special case of fax modems, using ADV_ARC?
Others might use FDP_IFC/FDP_IFF
How should we handle threats related to installing software?
Re-installation or upgrade of the main HCD software
Downloading and executing applets