Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byRadim Kubíček Modified over 5 years ago
1
Coupled channel analysis of the D 1P~ d 3P complex in NaK : potential energy curves and spin-orbit functions Anastasia Drozdova1,2 Amanda Ross1, Andrey Stolyarov2, Wlodzimierz Jastrzębski3, Paweł Kowalczyk4 1 LASIM Université Lyon 1 2 Department of Chemistry, Moscow State University 3 Institute of Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw 4 Institute for Experimental Physics, University of Warsaw E cm-1 24000 22000 20000 Na*(3p) + K(4s) R Na(3s) + K(4p)
2
Polarisation labelling spectrum shows obvious vibrational patterns
Polarisation labelling spectrum shows obvious vibrational patterns. In most cases, J assignments are known from the pump transition. Rotational spacings are a problem. De (D 1P) = cm-1 Converging to Na 2P3/2 + K(4s) limit … cm-1 Dominant D-X series of P(38),Q(38), R(38) triplets, with many ‘extra lines’. Pump transition was B-X Q(38) 7-2 ( cm-1)
3
1400 term energies for the D1Π~d3П complex of NaK
Term energies are located to ± cm-1 All series are very irregular. Robust fit gave a reasonable V(R) for the D 1P state, but only 74% of the data set is within 2 SD of measurements
4
Adiabatic approximation
4
5
Starting point for analysis of the D1Π~d3П states of NaK
E (cm-1) Overlap on inner wall produces large FCF overlap between d,D vibrational levels. Spin-orbit mixing tangles the spectrum. D 1P (experimental) d 3P (ab initio) R (Å)
6
Coupled channel calculation
ΦCC is a total nonadiabatic rovibronic wave function , V is the potential energy matrix ECC is the total nonadiabatic energy of the jth level of the complex aр are fitting parameters (Morse-Lennard Jones potentials, Morse SO functions) 6
7
Potential energy matrix.
Spin orbit matrix elements Diagonal ASO off-diagonal SO where x = J(J+1), and B(R) = Proceed with ‘normally’ weighted least squares fit to 30 parameters Expanded Morse Oscillator for SO functions Morse/Lennard Jones function for PE curves, with ab initio limiting behaviour ULR(R) = D – C6/R6 - C8/R8
8
Analytical representation of matrix elements
Potential energy curves Morse/Lenard-Jones (MLJ) model Spin-orbit functions Expanded Morse oscillator (EMO) model Potential energy curves Morse/Lenard-Jones (MLJ) model Potential energy curves Morse/Lenard-Jones (MLJ) model Potential energy curves Morse/Lenard-Jones (MLJ) model Potential energy curves Morse/Lenard-Jones (MLJ) model
9
Results: spin-orbit functions and revised PE curves
D 1P V(R) not very much altered from 1 channel calculation … E cm-1 8 6 4 SONa(3p) 5.73 cm-1 R (Angström) 9
10
Definite improvement with the four-channel model
Obs-Calc (cm-1) Na 3p 2P1/2 limit 10
11
This model is nonsense at the asymptote : D 1P and d 3P share a common limit!
12
Asymptotic energies for W = 1 states
K(4s) + Na(3p) data from Marinescu & Sadeghpour Phys. Rev. A, (1999) C6 (S) = a.u. (repulsive), C6 (1,3P) = a.u. (attractive) ; Energy matrix courtesy M. Aubert-Frécon (following J.Mol. Spectrosc (1998))
13
Next model for the asymptote ?
1 states only
14
Comments A reasonable model for the two lowest 1 states is within reach. The model still neglects effects of the continuum (lower SO limit) ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS - A. Drozdova, A. Stolyarov at MSU (Co-authors and principal contributors) - M. Aubert-Frécon, LASIM
15
Results: potential energy curves
R, A Enonad - Ead 3.300 0.798 5.000 -0.074 3.400 0.907 5.200 -0.367 3.500 -0.120 5.400 -0.482 3.600 -0.888 5.600 -0.491 3.700 -0.983 5.800 -0.475 3.800 -0.572 6.000 -0.458 3.900 -0.052 6.200 -0.431 4.000 0.229 6.400 -0.389 4.020 0.241 6.600 -0.338 4.040 0.238 6.800 -0.298 4.080 0.191 7.000 -0.290 4.100 0.150 7.200 -0.333 4.120 0.100 7.400 -0.438 4.140 0.043 7.600 -0.607 4.160 -0.017 7.800 -0.836 4.180 -0.079 8.000 -1.119 4.200 -0.139 8.200 -1.442 15
16
2-colour polarisation labelling : J selective excitation
Experiment performed at IF-PAN, Warsaw Excimer laser Dye laser Pump laser (Ar+) FD computer MC Ar HCL PMT FP PD boxcar 2 boxcar 3 boxcar 1 NaK source P1 P2 l/4 plate (removable) A PUMP beam goes through crossed polarisers placed either side of the heatpipe, then to a monochromator and PMT. The PROBE beam is scanned. PMT signals rise when probe resonance involves one of the ‘pumped’ levels.
17
Another spectrum (one of the better ones)
v’ = NaK D-X P,R doublets, J"=24 by P(24) 3-3 label, nm Ar+. Extra lines are indicated by asterisks o indicates Na2 B-X signals, J’=43 o o v’ = 27 30 o o o 35 40
18
Fit to a potential energy curve, eliminating all line/extra-line , using ‘robust’ weighting 1/[(si2 +( /3) 2] to compensate an inadequate model. V(R) is a 'Morse/Lennard-Jones' analytical expression given by Hajigeorgiou & Le Roy. J. Chem. Phys. 112, (2000) P=2, NS=2, NL = 8 Parameters to be determined are Re and f C6 case c limit is known from ab initio work 106 cm-1 Å6, Chem. Phys. 116, (1987)
19
Comments on the fit to a potential curve
74 % of the data set is reproduced to within 2 SD ~ 60 severe outliers (|Eobs – Ecalc | > 0.25 cm-1). Te (cm-1) (2) De (cm-1) fixed Re (Å ) (24) C6 (cm-1 Å6) fixed qL (1/ cm-1) 1.21(50) 10-3 This can be a starting point for a coupled state calculation.
20
Left over from late ’80s : small selection of T(v,J) energies, inadequate description of the D 1P molecular state, mixed with d 3P. E cm-1 4 AR thesis, Lyon Breford & Engelke, Bielfeld : T’ values from Ar+ dispersed LIF P. Kowalczyk : some 3P1 levels J. Mol. Spectrosc. 136, (1989) 1-11 Ferber group, Riga : L doubling low v Phys. Rev. A 58, (1998) Zaitsevski group, Moscow, deperturbed earlier data Mol. Phys. 96, (1999) 3 Na(3p) + K(4s) D,d 3 Na(3s) + K(4p) B c 1S+ 1P 3S+ 3P b A
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.