Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Metabolic differences in the small intestine AMetabolic genes as well as the associated reactions involved in the formation of glutathione (GSH) are presented.B,

Published byΜόνιμος Κωνσταντίνου Modified over 5 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Metabolic differences in the small intestine AMetabolic genes as well as the associated reactions involved in the formation of glutathione (GSH) are presented.B,"— Presentation transcript:

1 Metabolic differences in the small intestine AMetabolic genes as well as the associated reactions involved in the formation of glutathione (GSH) are presented.B, CSignificant differences associated with (B) glycine and (C) glutamine are shown. Metabolic differences in the small intestine AMetabolic genes as well as the associated reactions involved in the formation of glutathione (GSH) are presented.B, CSignificant differences associated with (B) glycine and (C) glutamine are shown. Red and blue arrows indicate the significantly (Q‐value < 0.05) higher and lower expression of the metabolic genes in CONV‐R mice compared to GF mice, respectively.DThe levels of glycine, glutamine, and cysteine used in the de novo synthesis of the GSH are measured in the hepatic portal vein that conducts blood from the gastrointestinal tract to the liver tissue. *Q‐value < 0.05. Adil Mardinoglu et al. Mol Syst Biol 2015;11:834 © as stated in the article, figure or figure legend

Download ppt "Metabolic differences in the small intestine AMetabolic genes as well as the associated reactions involved in the formation of glutathione (GSH) are presented.B,"

Similar presentations

Growth rate‐dependent gene expression under glucose limitation.

Growth rate‐dependent gene expression under glucose limitation.
Periodic changes in distribution of ERK–GFP fusion protein in cells after stimulation with EGF. (A) Confocal image of cells expressing ERK–GFP both before.

Periodic changes in distribution of ERK–GFP fusion protein in cells after stimulation with EGF. (A) Confocal image of cells expressing ERK–GFP both before.
Statistical analysis of the influence of network regulators on topology clusters in the oleate network. Statistical analysis of the influence of network.

Statistical analysis of the influence of network regulators on topology clusters in the oleate network. Statistical analysis of the influence of network.
Network topology reflects target gene expression profile and function.

Network topology reflects target gene expression profile and function.
Morphological analyses of peripheral blood and bone marrow cells isolated from leukemic mice. Morphological analyses of peripheral blood and bone marrow.

Morphological analyses of peripheral blood and bone marrow cells isolated from leukemic mice. Morphological analyses of peripheral blood and bone marrow.
Usage of l‐carnitine antimetabolites for the treatment of HCCl‐Carnitine and metabolites in the l‐carnitine biosynthetic pathway, as well as two essential.

Usage of l‐carnitine antimetabolites for the treatment of HCCl‐Carnitine and metabolites in the l‐carnitine biosynthetic pathway, as well as two essential.
Most promoters preserve their relative activity levels across conditions. Most promoters preserve their relative activity levels across conditions. (A)

Most promoters preserve their relative activity levels across conditions. Most promoters preserve their relative activity levels across conditions. (A)
Analysis of in silico flux changes along the exponential growth phase: (A) In silico flux changes from 24 to 36 h, from 36 to 48 h, and from 48 to 60 h.

Analysis of in silico flux changes along the exponential growth phase: (A) In silico flux changes from 24 to 36 h, from 36 to 48 h, and from 48 to 60 h.
Illustration of the reactions and metabolites obtained from random sampling. Illustration of the reactions and metabolites obtained from random sampling.

Illustration of the reactions and metabolites obtained from random sampling. Illustration of the reactions and metabolites obtained from random sampling.
Motif detectability corresponds to the phylogenetic profile of the cognate transcription factor. Motif detectability corresponds to the phylogenetic profile.

Motif detectability corresponds to the phylogenetic profile of the cognate transcription factor. Motif detectability corresponds to the phylogenetic profile.
Epistatic interactions and gene expression variation.

Epistatic interactions and gene expression variation.
Heatmaps of the gene mutation distributions in oncogene‐signaling blocks for six representative cancer types. Heatmaps of the gene mutation distributions.

Heatmaps of the gene mutation distributions in oncogene‐signaling blocks for six representative cancer types. Heatmaps of the gene mutation distributions.
(A) Protein biosynthesis on a chip and in solution.

(A) Protein biosynthesis on a chip and in solution.
Functional analysis of duplicate pair CIK1–VIK1 (A) Genetic interaction profile similarity. Functional analysis of duplicate pair CIK1–VIK1 (A) Genetic.

Functional analysis of duplicate pair CIK1–VIK1 (A) Genetic interaction profile similarity. Functional analysis of duplicate pair CIK1–VIK1 (A) Genetic.
Proteins with hotspot mutations are often in the interaction networks with known cancer driver proteins Proteins with hotspot mutations are often in the.

Proteins with hotspot mutations are often in the interaction networks with known cancer driver proteins Proteins with hotspot mutations are often in the.
(C–F) Complete interaction networks (representing both baits and preys) for selected groups of baits. (C–F) Complete interaction networks (representing.

(C–F) Complete interaction networks (representing both baits and preys) for selected groups of baits. (C–F) Complete interaction networks (representing.
Dose response of pAGA1 and pFIG1 induction

Dose response of pAGA1 and pFIG1 induction
What type of tissue is indicated by the blue arrow?

What type of tissue is indicated by the blue arrow?
Coupling immunophenotypes to Drop‐seq data

Coupling immunophenotypes to Drop‐seq data
Network derived from large‐scale fractionation predicts 48 protein complexes and communities Network derived from large‐scale fractionation predicts 48.

Network derived from large‐scale fractionation predicts 48 protein complexes and communities Network derived from large‐scale fractionation predicts 48.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google