1. Assessment Where Learning Matters
David Marshall, PhD, Senior Scholar
National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment (NILOA)

2. Today’s Workshop
A Hyper-Charrette

3. What’s a“charrette”?
"Charrette" (Fr.) means a small cart. Because architecture students once deposited their assignments in it as the cart was rolled through the studio, architects now use the word to refer to an intense creative effort in a limited time period.

4. Aussi . . .
In the tradition of the “atelier,” architecture students progress through the curriculum in the company of their mentors and peers. This approach offers an interesting model for an integrated education.
(b) The tradition rests on the assumption that much of your learning will come from one another.

5. Feedback
76% of participants said “it helped me more clearly see my assignment through my students’ eyes.
59%: I’m more aware of aligning my assignments with desired institutional outcomes.
38%: helped to lead or facilitate an event about assignment design on their campus
However, a lot of this work extended beyond assignment design in a course when looking at connections, and began to tie in with curriculum mapping – so, would it be usefl to everyone to talk a bit about that?

6. Small Group Process 25 minute segments per person/assignment
Present assignment/activity briefly—which outcomes, what course, which students, how does it work….
Discussion with group (focus on questions on feedback form)
Save 5 minutes for written feedback
Breath
Start again…
Debrief at end

7. Small Group Process 15 minute segments per person/assignment
Present assignment/activity briefly—which outcomes, what course, which students, how does it work….
Discussion with group (focus on questions on feedback form)
Save 3 minutes for written feedback
Breath
Start again…
Debrief at end

8. Questions:
What do you understand the evaluative criteria to be as expressed in the assignment or activity?
What in the assignment’s evaluative criteria aligns to the criteria expressed in the rubric?
What in the assignment’s evaluative criteria does not align to the criteria expressed in the rubric?
To what extent are the task and evaluative criteria clear for students?
Stay focused on these questions as you discuss each assignment or activity.

9. Thank You!

10. Reflect How did it go? What did you like about it? What worked well?
What needs to be different?
How might you continue these conversations?

11. Action Steps
What from these conversations is usable in your local context?
How can you get assignment conversations occurring on your campus?
What resources do you need?

15. Entry point if needed

16. Toolkits and library

18. What is UAA’s Learning Paradigm?

19. Outcomes Frameworks

20. Who is UAA? What resources are distinctive to UAA?
These might be curricular elements, student support programs, research strengths, special collections, geography, etc.
Who are the stakeholders and community partners unique to the campuses?
These might include campus departments or offices, local community groups, area employers, municipal offices, etc.
How much communication happens with these stakeholders and community partners?
Around what does that communication revolve?
What might the stakeholders and community partners not be aware of regarding your campus resources?
What would you like to know about your stakeholders and community partners?
A distinct identity is less to be found in what students will know, understand, and be able to do, and more to be found in the particular approaches an institution uses to help students achieve that learning.