Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byΆφροδίτη Ζάχος Modified over 5 years ago
1
Video-assisted mediastinoscopic lymphadenectomy is associated with better survival than mediastinoscopy in patients with resected non–small cell lung cancer Akif Turna, MD, PhD, FETCS, Ahmet Demirkaya, MD, Serkan Özkul, MD, Buge Oz, MD, Atilla Gurses, MD, Kamil Kaynak, MD, FETCS The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Volume 146, Issue 4, Pages (October 2013) DOI: /j.jtcvs Copyright © 2013 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions
2
Figure 1 CONSORT 2010 diagram of the study. VAMLA, Video-assisted mediastinoscopic lymphadenectomy. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery , DOI: ( /j.jtcvs ) Copyright © 2013 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions
3
Figure 2 Survival curves of patients who underwent video-assisted mediastinoscopic lymphadenectomy (VAMLA) or standard mediastinoscopy. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery , DOI: ( /j.jtcvs ) Copyright © 2013 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions
4
Figure 3 Survival curves of propensity-matched non–small cell lung cancer patients (n = 50) who underwent either video-assisted mediastinoscopic lymphadenectomy (VAMLA) or standard mediastinoscopy. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery , DOI: ( /j.jtcvs ) Copyright © 2013 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.