Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
MEBT SAR BUNCHER CAVITIES
Nagore Garmendia (On behalf of Buncher Team) Bilbao, 27 March 2019
2
MEBT SAR – Buncher cavities
Outline Buncher team Introduction Specifications and requirements Strategy: design, manufacturing and test plan Design process Manufacturing process Test procedures Cavity interfaces and elements Experimental results Conclusions and next steps MEBT SAR – Buncher cavities
3
MEBT SAR – Buncher cavities
Buncher Team Task Description Team Beam dynamics simulations I. Bustinduy EM Design and simulations O. Gonzalez; J.L. Muñoz Mechanical Design and drawings A. Zugazaga; I. Rueda Thermomechanical simulations A. Paramo; J.L. Muñoz Manufacturing A. Zugazaga ; I. Rueda Vacuum Test A. Zugazaga; A. Conde; J. Martin RF Test bench + bead pull N . Garmendia; High power RF test N. Garmendia ; A. Kaftoosian Assembly and Integration A. Conde; J. Martin Coupler and tuners R. San Martin; I. Rueda Motion control and EPICs I. Mazkiaran Project Manager (MEBT; RF) I. Bustinduy ; P. Gonzalez MEBT SAR – Buncher cavities
4
Introduction: MEBT Bunchers
MEBT: RFQ – DTL beam matching BU#3 BU#2 BU#1 Longitudinal focusing MEBT SAR – Buncher cavities
5
MEBT SAR – Buncher cavities
Specifcations Specification Doors ID Description Value ACC.L1 ESS.SyR-430 Nominal operational repetition rate 14 Hertz. ESS.SyR-450 Nominal operational beam pulse length 2,86 ms ACC. L2 ACC.SyR-19 For beam energies greater than 1.0 MeV, the nominal bunch frequency 352,21 MHz MEBT.EMR.Syr-36 MEBT.EMR.SyR-36 Cavity peak field; Kilpatrick <1,5 MEBT-L4-EMR-090 MEBT.EMR.SyR-37 Maximum gap voltage 150 kV MEBT-L4-EMR-140 MEBT.EMR.SyR-42 Maximum coupled peak power into the cavity 18 kW MEBT-L4-EMR-150 MEBT.EMR.SyR-43 RF coupler power handling 22,5 kW MEBT-L4-EMR-180 MEBT.EMR.SyR-46 Cavity aperture (diameter) 30mm MEBT-L4-EMR-190 MEBT.EMR.SyR-47 Cavity longitudinal space (Lmax) <190mm MEBT SAR – Buncher cavities
6
MEBT SAR – Buncher cavities
Requirements Parameter Description Particle Energy 3.62 MeV Max RF pulse width 3,5 ms Max RF Duty Cycle 4.9 % Maximum RF input peak power 22.5 kW Unloaded quality factor >18000 Tuner linearity > 15 kHz/mm Nominal cooling water temperature 25ºC +/-1º Coupling coupler coefficient MEBT SAR – Buncher cavities
7
MEBT SAR – Buncher cavities
Strategy (I) corrections 2 Design 1 Manufacturing Manufacturing Prototype BU#1; BU#2;BU#3 Tests Test procedures CDR Integration plan MEBT SAR – Buncher cavities
8
MEBT SAR – Buncher cavities
Strategy (II) Manufacturing Phases PHASE DESCRIPTION PH1 SS Machining and welding (local supplier) PH2 Copper plating (GSI) Test Plan PHASE MT VT LPT CT PH1 X PH2 MT: Metrology + rugosity VT: Outgassing (impurity) + Leak test (welding and sealing) LPT: Low Power RF Test+ Bead-pull CT: Conditioning test MEBT SAR – Buncher cavities
9
MEBT SAR – Buncher cavities
Design process Considerations Taking into account the size and RF requirements ( Fr=352,2 MHz; EoT=150 kV) a nose-cone single gap type cavity is the optimal option The internal buncher dimensions take into account electro- magnetic, thermo-mechanic, RF and beam dynamics SS versus copper manufacturing has implications in vacuum sealing, cooling system, Rf perfmances,… BEAM DYNAMICS EM DESIGN THERMO-MECHANICAL MEBT SAR – Buncher cavities
10
MEBT SAR – Buncher cavities
Manufacturing (I) Considerations Applicable standards: ISO ; ISO and ISO 5817 Critical tolerance definition for a manufacturing from stainless steel copper plated (copper layer of 30 μm) Certificated materials and thermal treatment for mechanical stress relief Drawings and manufacturing procedure for Helicoflex for vacuum seal The cavity resonant frequency deviations due to manufacturing are corrected by means of the fixed tuner (tuning range) Finger strips are foreseen in coupler, tuners and pick-up to increase the cavity efficiency (Qo) VACUUM SEAL FINGER STRIPS MEBT SAR – Buncher cavities
11
MEBT SAR – Buncher cavities
Manufacturing (II) SS THERMAL TREATMENT MACHINING PORTS: TIG WELDING COPPER PLATING MEBT SAR – Buncher cavities
12
MEBT SAR – Buncher cavities
Test procedure Metrology Roughness Cooling System Vacuum: Outgassing + Leakage Low Power RF Bead-pull Conditioning Not ready: Coupler SSPA LLRF and RFLPS rack MEBT SAR – Buncher cavities
13
MEBT SAR – Buncher cavities
Metrology Performed by the manufacturer after the manufacturing in SS by means of a three-dimensional measuring machine (CMM) in a temperature controlled room at 20 ± 1 ° Repeated at ESS Bilbao Metrology facility before and after copper plating SS cavity: manufacturer SS and Cu cavity: ESS Bilbao MEBT SAR – Buncher cavities
14
MEBT SAR – Buncher cavities
Roughness Different roughness specifications are required for : Helicoflex vacuum sealing contact Assure the cavity efficiency ( Qo) Performed by the manufacturer after the SS machining Repeated at ESS Bilbao laboratory before and after copper plating SS cavity: manufacturer SS and Cu cavity: ESS Bilbao MEBT SAR – Buncher cavities
15
MEBT SAR – Buncher cavities
Cooling system Two independent circuits for body and cover cavity to optimised the design Specifications: static pressure test at 16 bar during15 minutes with a decrease < 0.1 bar Performed by the manufacturer after SS machining and repeated at ESS Bilbao after Simulations Manufacturer test ESS Bilbao test MEBT SAR – Buncher cavities
16
MEBT SAR – Buncher cavities
Vacuum test Leakage level specification <2*e-10 mbar*l/s Tests: pressure evolution , outgassing (RGA) and leakage test performed by the manufacturer after SS machining and repeated after copper plating at ESS Bilbao vacuum lab ESS Bilbao Vacuum Test bench RGA Leak Detection Pressure Evolution MEBT SAR – Buncher cavities
17
MEBT SAR – Buncher cavities
Low power RF Test Implementation of a test bench with a automatic data acquisition for S- parameters and with a precise algorithm to determine the quality factor The tuning system is validated with two manual dummy tuners Figure of Merit Test Res. Frequency, [MHz] T01 HOM2; HOM3 (MHz) T02 Quality factor T03 Coupler coupling factor T04 Pick-up coupling factor T05 Cavity insertion loss T06 Frequency tuning range T07 Tuner linearity T08 MEBT SAR – Buncher cavities
18
MEBT SAR – Buncher cavities
Bead-pull Implementation of bead-pull test bench based in the Slater´s perturbation theory to obtain the accelerating field profile from the bead frequency shift Main figures of merit: Ez,T, RT2; Pdiss Bead-calibration with a pillbox cavity to assure accurate results Bead calibration Bead-pull test bench Accelerating electric field profile MEBT SAR – Buncher cavities
19
Mechanical interfaces
Port Description Dim. A Vacuum port CF60 B Fixed Tuner C RF input power coupler D Movable tuner E Pick-up port CF40 F Gauge port G Cavity support RAFT2 MEBT SAR – Buncher cavities
20
Power coupling Coupler
Magnetic loop in charge of the transmission the RF power to the cavity ESS Bilbao design based in Alumina ceramic window (the peek coupler design was rejected due to vacuum requirements) Manufacturing and brazing under procedure validation in ESS Bilbao Welding Center Manufacturing EM simulations Drawings MEBT SAR – Buncher cavities
21
MEBT SAR – Buncher cavities
Pick-up The magnetic loop takes the RF sample for LLRF, interlock and control system ESS Bilbao design with an commercial flange and EM simulations Drawings Manufacturing Test and validation A B C D MEBT SAR – Buncher cavities
22
MEBT SAR – Buncher cavities
Fixed Tuner To compensate the frequency deviation due to the manufacturing and copper plating tolerances ESS Bilbao design to avoid the brazing between the copper cylinder and the commercial SS flange EM simulations Manufacturing Test and validation Drawings MEBT SAR – Buncher cavities
23
MEBT SAR – Buncher cavities
Movable tuner To compensate frequency deviation during the beam operation Commercial linear actuator controlled by the LLRF system Motion control test and EPICs integration done and validated EM simulations Drawings Test and validation MEBT SAR – Buncher cavities
24
Low Power and Bead-pull Test Results
Figure of Merit BU-1 BU-2 BU-3 C/NC Res. Frequency, [MHz] 352.21 C Penetration Tuner 1, L1[mm] 50 40,5 40 Penetration Tuner 2, L2[mm] 32 25 Sensitivity, [KHz/mm/tuner] 16.3 16.2 βcoupler / βpickup_max 0.94 / 0.136 1.1 / 0.15 1.09 / 0.14 IL_min(dB) 9.3 9 10 Ql 8108 8125 8144 Qo 16883* 18415 18250 BW, [KHz] 43.3 43 43.2 RTT/Q [Ω] 73.85 76.7 76.9 RTT [MΩ] 1.25 1.41 ZTT [MΩ/m] 9.89 11.2 11.14 Transit Time Factor (T) 0.65 0.654 0.645 Effective Voltage VoT [KV] 160/100 160/120 160/140 Dissipated Power, Pd [Kw] 20.5 / 8 18.1 / 13.8 18.2 / 13.9 Max Acc. Field Ez_max [MV/m] 9.4 9.36 9.28 *for 160 kV, the specifications is 150 kV MEBT SAR – Buncher cavities
25
MEBT SAR – Buncher cavities
Cavities in MEBT Taking into account the beam dynamics simulations the first buncher cavity requires less effective accelerating field and the last one is the most demanding, therefore the less and the most effective cavities are located as first and third in the MEBT after analysing all the experimental results. Parameter BU#1 BU#2 BU#3 EoT sim (kV) 60 130 150 RTT/Q [Ω] 73.85 76.7 76.4 Location in MEBT 1st 2nd 3th ESS official name MEBT-010:EMR-Tnk-001 MEBT-010:EMR-Tnk-002 MEBT-010:EMR-Tnk-003 MEBT SAR – Buncher cavities
26
MEBT SAR – Buncher cavities
Conditioning A first version procedure has been defined for the conditioning: Previous checking list State machine and start-up procedure Conditioning steps with a foreseen configurations: pulse width, frequency repetition rate (i.e. duty cycle ) and RF power level MEBT SAR – Buncher cavities
27
MEBT SAR – Buncher cavities
Conditioning BUNCHER component Status Cavities Tested Pick-ups Fixed tunners Movable tuner + actuator Motion control MC EPICs integration Coupler Manufacturing at ESSB (end of May) SSPAs Manufacturing at BTESA (end of July) RF Rack control To be provided by ESS MEBT SAR – Buncher cavities
28
MEBT SAR – Buncher cavities
Conclusions The design, manufacturing and test procedure were defined and validated with a complete experimental characterization of a buncher prototype (BU#0) The three buncher cavities have been measured with the low power RF test and the results are in agreement with the simulations and requirements. The pickups, fixed tuner and movable tuner have been also measured and validated The power alumina coupler is under manufacturing at ESS Bilbao facilities (brazing end of May) The SSPAs are under manufacturing (BETESA, Spain. 1st for end of July)) The RF control to be provided by ESS Next step : Coupler and cavity conditioning strategy : Totally advisable at ESS Bilbao ( cavities delivery?) Alternative: buncher versus test box to be study: time, cost, resources, delivery time, breakdown risk,… MEBT SAR – Buncher cavities
29
MEBT SAR – Buncher cavities
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION Questions ? MEBT SAR – Buncher cavities
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.