1. The Relationship(s) of Theory and Practice
What do these perspectives say about theological education?

2. 1. Theory leads to practice
The dominant thinking pattern: Theory (or theology) informs practice. Practice does not inform theory.

3. 2. Practice leads to theory
2. Grounded theory: Theory formed from the examination of practice (data).

4. 3. Theory alone T
3. The Ivory Tower: Theory informs, but does not lead to practice.

5. 4. Practice alone P
The trenches: Life is common sense, no reflection needed. Don’t need theory. Just do it.

6. 5. Theory and practice in synergy
Synergy: Theory influences practice. Practice influences theory.

7. 6. No theory and no practice
What we really prefer

8. What is the place of theory and practice in MATUL?
All these models have a place in God’s Kingdom.
But in MATUL we want to avoid:
3. Theory alone
4. Practice alone
6. No theory and no practice

9. What is the place of theory and practice in MATUL?
We do want:
1. Theory that leads to practice
2. Practice leads to theory
5. Theory and practice in synergy

10. What is the place of theory and practice in MATUL?
We want theories (social science and theological) that lead to best practice. P

11. What is the place of theory and practice in MATUL?
We also want to shape theory from best practices.
The Encarnacao Alliance has the ability to build from Scripture and practice a theory and theology of ministry among the urban poor. P T

12. What is the place of theory and practice in MATUL?
Ultimately we strive for a synergy of theory (social science and theology) and best practice that shapes ministry among the urban poor for the 21st century.