Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byΈχω Νικολαΐδης Modified over 5 years ago
1
Middle Fork Project TERR 3 – Noxious Weed Technical Study Report Overview
February 17, 2009
2
TERR 3 Study Objectives Document Noxious Weed Populations at Existing Project Facilities and Features, Recreation Facilities, and Dispersed Concentrated Use Areas Document Noxious Weed Populations at Potential Project Betterments, Including New Facilities, Roads, and Trails; Staging and Disposal Sites; as Well as New Inundation Areas
3
Study Implementation Implemented in Accordance with TERR 3 – TSP
Consistent with Section 2083 of the Forest Service Manual, Information and Reporting Guidelines for Noxious Weeds (USDA-FS 1995) Conducted in Conjunction with: Special-Status plant surveys (June, July, and August 2008) Riparian surveys at quantitative geomorphic and riparian sampling sites (2007)
4
Noxious Weed Survey Results
27 Noxious Weed Species Identified 24 species at existing Project facilities and features 18 species at Project recreation facilities 23 species at dispersed concentrated use areas 19 species at potential Project betterments 20 species at quantitative geomorphic and riparian sampling sites
5
Noxious Weed Survey Results (continued)
Five Noxious Weed Species Identified were not Previously Recorded in the Project Area Italian thistle (Carduus pycnocephalus) Malta starthistle (tocalote) (Centaurea melitensis) Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) White sweet clover (Melilotus albus) Spreading hedgeparsley (Torilis arvensis)
6
Noxious Weed Survey Results (continued)
Most Abundant Noxious Weed Species: Noxious Weed Species Cal-IPC CDFA Acres Common mullein Verbascum thapsus Limited - 315 Cheatgrass Bromus tectorum High 280 Rat-tail fescue Vulpia myuros Moderate 225
7
Location of Noxious Weeds – Ralston Area
8
Location of Noxious Weeds – Hell Hole Reservoir Seasonal Storage Increase Betterment
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.