Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

EMEP intensive measurements, June 2006

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "EMEP intensive measurements, June 2006"— Presentation transcript:

1 EMEP intensive measurements, June 2006
Wenche Aas

2 Announced measurements before June 2006

3 Received data from NO001 (Birkenes)
PM10,PM2.5,PM1 mass and chemical speciation (inorg, EC/OC) –daily IT001 (Montelibretti) PM10,PM2.5 mass chemical speciation (inorg, EC/OC, mineral) -daily Number distributen and denuder measurements NL0011 (Cabauw) PM10,PM2.5 (inorganic –NH4,NO3,Na, Cl, SO4 + gases) -hourly CZ0003 (Kozetice) PM10, PM2.5 mass and heavy metals (Mn, Pb, Ni, Cd, Cu, As) –daily DK0041 (Lille Valby) PM10, PM2.5, PM1 mass (+ NOx and O3) -hourly and daily FI0017 (Virolahti) PM10,PM2.5,PM1 mass and inorganic ions -daily DE0041 (Melpitz) Berner impactor (5 sizes) mass and inorganic ions –daily PM10,PM2.5,PM1 mass and chemical speciation (inorg, EC/OC) daily BC, number distr, and PM10,PM2.5,PM1 mass -hourly UK, CH (Eiko’s talk) + ES will deliver SE0012 (Aspvreten) PM data stolen from a NMR project…

4 Average mass concentrations

5 Italy, Montelibretti PM10 Crustal ++ PM2.5 SO4 +

6 Finland, Virolahti PM1 PM10 SO4,Ca NH4 + rest SO4, NH4 + rest
Flagged with contamination (K for PM1, all ions for PM10)

7 Norway, Birkenes PM1 SO4; NH4; NO3 + rest PM10 SO4; NH4 + rest

8 Netherlands, Cabauw Hourly MARGA meas. at two sizes

9 Germany, Melpitz

10 25th of June

11 Germany, Melpitz

12 23rd of June

13 Melpitz, chemical speciation from Digitel sampler
PM1 PM10 PM2.5

14 Other sites with mainly mass measurements
High Mn High Cd High Cu High Ni

15 Summary - Outlook Large efforts have been done at many sites
Very valuable dataset New intensive period in January start 8th of January and continue for 4 weeks. How and what to present in the PM assessment report?? Will it be time to finish all the chemical analysis? A thorough evaluation of the data will be difficult to accomplish in time for the PM assessment report It should also be published in a peer reviewed paper later Should each participant evaluate their own data or should it be centralized? Data ownership. How to include model intercomparison. Any time for that?


Download ppt "EMEP intensive measurements, June 2006"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google