1. Evaluation of Public Administrations‘ Added Value to the Lisbon Strategy Goals
Dr Gordana Žurga

2. Contents About the project; May IPSG meeting at Brdo – discussion
and decisions;
2nd Draft Report;
First evaluation results;
Proposal for continuation
IPSG Meeting, Paris, July 2008

3. Timing Discussion at the IPSG I meeting 18-19 Feb
Call for providing the information / template
25 Feb
Information from the MS
11 April
Discussion on draft report at the IPSG II meeting
12-13 May
Discussion on second draft report at the July IPSG meeting
10-11 July
Finalising the report, printing a publication for the 5QC
October 2008
IPSG Meeting, Paris, July 2008

4. Expected results Presentation of the results at the 5QC
conference in October 2008 in Paris,
Publication – printed version, pdf version,
Presentation of countries' cases / projects
which contributed the most to the Lisbon
goals in an individual country,
Presentation / review of contribution to the
realisation of Lisbon Strategy goals, from
the IPSG's point of view
IPSG Meeting, Paris, July 2008

5. May IPSG Meeting at Brdo
Report to be further elaborated, to
reflect clear intentions / focus; more efforts
to be put in presenting the results;
to explore ways of the most suitable
presentation of national cases …;
Next draft to be presented and discussed
at the IPSG Meeting in July 2008,
together with a proposal on contacting
other EUPAN WGs in this regard
IPSG Meeting, Paris, July 2008

6. The 2nd Draft Report 26 Member States, 24 national cases;
First evaluation results;
National cases presented regarding the
4 basic questions;
Info on co-ordination and national
programmes – valuable source for
benchmarking / bench learning
IPSG Meeting, Paris, July 2008

7. First evaluation results (1/5)
National cases:
Vary a lot;
Tested upon:
- Working areas;
- Public policies aspect;
- Lisbon Strategy aspect;
- Public Administration aspect
IPSG Meeting, Paris, July 2008

8. First evaluation results (2/5)
Four basic questions: A
Are we doing right things? B
Are we doing things right? C
Can goals of the future be achieved through the structure of today? D
How can we foster science, research, development and innovation?
IPSG Meeting, Paris, July 2008

9. First evaluation results (3/5)
Are we doing right things? France AB
Are we doing right things in a right way? Greece, Spain B
Are we doing things right?
RAB/BR: Czech Republic, Estonia, Germany, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, The Netherlands, Portugal, Slovak Republic, Slovenia
eGov: Denmark
PAR/QM/sector: Bulgaria, Cyprus, Poland, Romania C
Can goals of the future be achieved through the structure of today? Finland D
How can we foster science, research, development and innovation? Austria, Belgium, Ireland
IPSG Meeting, Paris, July 2008

10. (4/5) Functions & policies Research & innovation Trust & sinergy
Good governance, partnership
Customers & results orientat. A
France AB
Greece, Spain B
Bulgaria,
Italy,
Slovenia
Czech Republic, Germany,
Latvia, Luxembourg, Romania
Cyprus,
Denmark, Estonia, Lithuania,
Malta,
The Netherlands, Poland,
Portugal,
Slovak Republic C
Finland D
Austria, Belgium, Ireland
IPSG Meeting, Paris, July 2008

11. First evaluation results (5/5)
Summary:
Variety of approaches and possible
combinations;
Cases are not supported by clear
reasults achieved;
A strong benchmarking and bench
learning platform
IPSG Meeting, Paris, July 2008

12. EUPAN / IPSG point of view
National cases are related to all
EUPAN WG areas;
2nd Draft to be sent to all EUPAN WGs;
Feedback - comments by
19th August 2008;
Analysis to be included in the report
IPSG Meeting, Paris, July 2008