Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byAlbert Dean Modified over 5 years ago
1
Telecom use on a shoestring: Some findings from a study of the Financially Constrained in South Asia
Ayesha Zainudeen, Rohan Samarajiva, Ayoma Abeysuriya, Harsha de Silva, Divakar Goswami, Mariam Hameed, Tahani Iqbal, Malathy Knight-John, Sriganesh Lokanathan, Avanti Moonesinghe, Chanuka Wattegama. Usable Knowledge for Growing the Sector: ICT Policy & Regulation Research from LIRNEasia 19 December 2005, Colombo shoestrings/LIRNEasia/ColNewsConf 19Dec05
2
Objectives of the Study
Understand the use of telecom services by the ‘financially constrained’ in South Asia To what extent do they use it? What benefits do they gain from use? How do they use it? Why do they use it the way that they do? shoestrings/LIRNEasia/ColNewsConf 19Dec05
3
Sample Surveys in India & Sri Lanka (3199 in total) ‘Users’
Not representative of India & Sri Lanka as wholes ‘Users’ those who have used a phone in the last three months ‘Financially constrained’ users: Socio-Economic Classification (SEC) groups B,C,D & E Monthly income < USD100 Mix of urban (37.5%) and rural (62.5%) respondents Sample was selected from those above the age of 18 SEC is determined by occupation and education of the head of the household. SL – SECs B,C,D,E India – a different but comparable classification is used – urban: SEC B,C,D,E; Rural: R1,R2,R3,R4 (determined by education of the chief wage earner and material used to build chief wage earner’s house) shoestrings/LIRNEasia/ColNewsConf 19Dec05
4
Methodology Face-to-face interviews Questionnaire: Closed-ended
Pilot-tested (in India and SL) and refined Designed by LIRNEasia team (6) with implementing partner Sampling Purposive selection of localities Random selection of households KISH grid used to select within households KISH – random sampling technique selects 1 respondent from many eligible respondents. ensures that there is no skewing toward gender or age. Eligibility: Over 18 Used phone in last 3 months Monthly income < USD100 PILOTS Sri Lanka – 20 India – 40 (according to contract) shoestrings/LIRNEasia/ColNewsConf 19Dec05
5
Sri Lanka: 1100 respondents, 4 localities, 2 languages
Jaffna – post conflict area, high migration Note –NOT a study to represent ‘India’ and ‘Sri Lanka’ Sample size: Colombo (Western Province) : Urban Jaffna (Northern Province) : Urban, Rural 282 Hambantota (Southern Province): Urban, Rural 301 Badulla (Uva Province): Urban, Rural 311 Badulla – rural, plantation economy, hill country Colombo - capital city, urban landscape Hambantota – rural, tsunami affected shoestrings/LIRNEasia/ColNewsConf 19Dec05
6
India: 2099 respondents, 7 localities, 5 languages
Kasargod – fisheries & remittance based economy Gorakhpur – agrarian economy Mumbai – metropolitan, in Asia’s largest slum Dehradoon – agrarian economy, foothills of Himalayas Cuttack – poor area, high migration Sivaganga – trading, fishing & agrarian economy Neemuch - flat, arid area India: 2099 respondents, 7 localities, 5 languages ‘Northern’ ‘Southern’ Mumbai (Maharashtra) : Urban 304 Kasargod (Kerala) : Urban, Rural 300 Sivaganga (T.Nadu) : Urban, Rural 300 Gorakhpur (Uttar Pradesh): Urban, Rural 300 Cuttack (Orissa): Urban, Rural 300 Dehradoon (Uttaranchal) : Urban, Rural 295 Neemuch (Madhya Pradesh) : Urban, Rural 300 shoestrings/LIRNEasia/ColNewsConf 19Dec05
7
Questionnaire ‘Mode’ of access: Reasons for selecting mode
fixed, mobile, ‘public access’ Reasons for selecting mode Ownership & use by other people How telecom services are used Usage patterns What they are used for (purposes) Ways in which they are used (strategies) Difficulties faced Use of Internet & telegrams shoestrings/LIRNEasia/ColNewsConf 19Dec05
8
Limitations Difficult to make accurate comparisons with groups not studied (financially ‘unconstrained’) Closed ended questionnaire Could have been supplemented with Focus Group Discussions Calling patterns based on recall data Weaknesses in a few questions shoestrings/LIRNEasia/ColNewsConf 19Dec05
9
Findings How the financially constrained communicate
Why they choose fixed, mobile or public phones What they use them for How they use them Constraints & considerations Expenditure & cost perceptions shoestrings/LIRNEasia/ColNewsConf 19Dec05
10
Everyone in uses phones…
some higher than income bracket we required, not speaking the language, refused to be interviewed, no body at home, not a household, no adult in the house, not in the age group, someone in the household works in a ad agency/ research/ media, participated in a survey in the last 6 months, SEC higher, no number for the house, couldn't find the household with the number, no one at home. All these entries what field team came across when following the KISH grid. shoestrings/LIRNEasia/ColNewsConf 19Dec05
11
shoestrings/LIRNEasia/ColNewsConf 19Dec05
shoestrings/LIRNEasia/ColNewsConf 19Dec05
12
…but 58% do not own one! Phone ownership doubles in higher income groups What people own Sri Lanka India < USD 50 USD50-100 Landline Only 2 20 19 37 Mobile Only 21 28 3 8 Landline + Mobile 1 4 6 shoestrings/LIRNEasia/ColNewsConf 19Dec05
13
66% use public access phones
Fixed (49%) Mobile (19%) ‘Public’ access (66%) 21% 2% 11% 3% 23% 37% Base: 3199 shoestrings/LIRNEasia/ColNewsConf 19Dec05
14
Non-owners (fixed) mostly use PCOs and payphones to make calls
shoestrings/LIRNEasia/ColNewsConf 19Dec05
15
Higher reliance on public access in India
{14.3} Mode of access used by respondents in Sri Lanka, Northern India and Southern India. shoestrings/LIRNEasia/ColNewsConf 19Dec05
16
I allow ‘others’ to use my phone
Fixed users Mobile users {25.0} {25.1} FIXED: India – 32%* Sri Lanka – 25% Mostly 1-4 people per month, making/receiving calls 1-4 times per week Most often, the problems faced relate to the inconvenience of having to go out and pass messages or go and call the person when a call is received Charging for calls – only outgoing: 23% [India – 19% Sri Lanka – 42%*] Usually to cover the cost of the call (56%), sometimes below cost (31%) Why? Most often as a ‘public service’ or for the sake of ‘friendship’ MOBILE: India – 10% Sri Lanka – 6% Most often 1-4 people per month, making/receiving calls 1-2 times per week (v.low bases) Most often, the problems faced relate to the inconvenience of having to go out and call the person when a call is received 19% charge for outgoing calls, Usually to cover the cost of the call or sometimes below cost. shoestrings/LIRNEasia/ColNewsConf 19Dec05
17
…reflects availability of service
wide availability of PCO in India India & Sri Lanka almost same penetration on fixed Sri Lanka higher in mobile but India growing too Sri Lanka had mobile since 1989; India since 1994 India converted to CPP in 2003; Sri Lanka is still RPP Subscribers per 100 inhabitants (Sept 2005) Sri Lanka India Mobile 15.6 5.96 Fixed 5.7 4.4 Source: TRAI, TRCSL (2005) [ITU (2004) ITU Internet Reports: The Portable Internet, pp.A8-A9] shoestrings/LIRNEasia/ColNewsConf 19Dec05
18
...and larger group of poorer people in Indian sample
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Sri Lanka India % of respondents USD50-100 per month <USD50 {13.1} shoestrings/LIRNEasia/ColNewsConf 19Dec05
19
Usage patterns: mobile users make more calls than fixed users in Sri Lankan and Northern Indian sample 10 20 30 40 50 60 outgoing incoming fixed mobile average number of calls per month Sri Lanka Northern India Southern India {8.1} (incl. public phone users) shoestrings/LIRNEasia/ColNewsConf 19Dec05
20
SMS use is low… What they use SMS for: Why they use it:
personal communication 88% emergency communication 37% business communication 7% to minimize comm. expenditure 88% as a signal 58% to make sure message is received 48% 59% of SMS users use English language for messages shoestrings/LIRNEasia/ColNewsConf 19Dec05
21
83 % of mobile users on pre-paid
{11.1} Base: all respondents shoestrings/LIRNEasia/ColNewsConf 19Dec05
22
Prepaid cheaper than postpaid in India…
shoestrings/LIRNEasia/ColNewsConf 19Dec05
23
… and Sri Lanka shoestrings/LIRNEasia/ColNewsConf 19Dec05
shoestrings/LIRNEasia/ColNewsConf 19Dec05
24
Basket methodology Based on OECD methodology with modifications
RPP Prepaid & post-paid Based on monthly tariffs of cheapest tariff package of largest operator in each country India – Airtel (Bharti) – 28% (July’05) Sri Lanka – Dialog Telkom – 60% (July ’05) Basket includes airtime (in/out), SMSs, rental & connection charges + free airtime & SMSs Outgoing calls/month SMS/month Low user 25 30 Medium user 75 35 High user 150 42 shoestrings/LIRNEasia/ColNewsConf 19Dec05
25
Why people choose phones: Cost & convenience
% of users who chose a mode for reason... 20 40 60 80 social status fashion value added services privacy mobility easy to use easy to access can use at any time save on travel time and cost clear connection no other choice control costs economical to receive calls economical to make calls Fixed Mobile Public access COST CONVENIENCE Base: full sample Fixed:1580 Mobile: 616 Public access: 2106 SYMBOLIC Top two reasons: FIXED: economical to receive; clarity of connection MOBILE: can use at anytime (emergency); mobility (can be on the move) PUBLIC ACCESS: easy to use; economical to make calls Higher rating of ‘most economical way to receive calls’ on mobiles in Indian locations (72% vs. 35% in SL) Despite India being CPP since 2003! {15 a 2} shoestrings/LIRNEasia/ColNewsConf 19Dec05
26
What they use phones for: relationship maintenance
20 40 60 80 100 keeping in touch (local) keeping in touch (international) send news & messages receive news & messages financial transactions business transactions /enquiries arranging logistics access Internet fixed mobile public access BASES: Fixed: 1580 Mobile: 616 Public: 2106 INSTRUMENTAL RELATIONSHIP MAINTAINANCE Higher sending and receiving messages in India {Indpurp} {16.1} Although non-owners also use the phone for relationship maintenance purposes, they tend to focus on sending/receiving news & messages, rather than purely keeping in touch. shoestrings/LIRNEasia/ColNewsConf 19Dec05
27
Use of mobiles: relationships in SL; also some instrumental use in India
20 40 60 80 100 keeping in touch (national) keeping in touch (international) send news & messages receive news & messages financial transactions business transactions/enquiries arranging logistics access Internet SL India Bases: SL: 374 India: 242 International communication in SL is higher on mobiles Some evidence of more instrumental use on mobiles in India {16.3} shoestrings/LIRNEasia/ColNewsConf 19Dec05
28
Gender Patterns: Fixed: men use the phone for relationship maintenance as much as women
* Statistically significant difference * Extensive literature on developed countries, showing significant differences between men and women’s use of phones [our findings] Relationship building purposes are higher in women, instrumental purposes higher in men [no sig. diff] Women use the phone more than men [# of calls is not sig. differences] Women spend more time on the phone (longer call duration) [no sig. diff in call durations] [Reasons behind choice of access (f/m/p) do not differ either; both consider economic and convenience factors] Relationship maintenance instrumental shoestrings/LIRNEasia/ColNewsConf 19Dec05
29
Same story on mobiles (minor difference on business transactions) …
* Relationship maintenance instrumental shoestrings/LIRNEasia/ColNewsConf 19Dec05
30
Relationship maintenance
…and public access * * Relationship maintenance instrumental shoestrings/LIRNEasia/ColNewsConf 19Dec05
31
How is the phone used: ‘strategies’ on mobile
shoestrings/LIRNEasia/ColNewsConf 19Dec05
32
43 % of mobile owners switch off their phone: not for cost reasons
COST FACTORS {0.1} shoestrings/LIRNEasia/ColNewsConf 19Dec05
33
Time of day that users make calls
{6.3} {6.3 SL} On fixed, no difference between india and SL patterns * No peak-off peak differentials on mobile in India shoestrings/LIRNEasia/ColNewsConf 19Dec05
34
Little strategic use… Little discretion in the few calls that they make Heavier users use a few more strategies Few options to make use of strategies 69% have access to only one mode Majority are using other people’s phones 58% don’t own phones shoestrings/LIRNEasia/ColNewsConf 19Dec05
35
Heavier users use more strategies (back)
shoestrings/LIRNEasia/ColNewsConf 19Dec05
36
Use of installment plans on fixed phones
Getting connected: Financing fixed line connections slightly harder in Sri Lanka – use of installment plans Use of installment plans on fixed phones {21.1(2)} {23.1} shoestrings/LIRNEasia/ColNewsConf 19Dec05
37
Reflects connection charges for fixed phones
Sri Lanka incumbent = USD 180 (min.) Sri Lanka entrants = USD 120 India incumbent = USD 16 shoestrings/LIRNEasia/ColNewsConf 19Dec05
38
Where owners got money for the connection from
Opposite case in mobiles in Sri Lanka: less people had money available for connection Where owners got money for the connection from {21.1.1} shoestrings/LIRNEasia/ColNewsConf 19Dec05
39
Getting handsets: 10% got it free; 33% of Indians bought second-hand handsets
{4.151} shoestrings/LIRNEasia/ColNewsConf 19Dec05
40
Difficulties in getting fixed connections: waiting time, paper work, & other inconveniences in India
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 difficulty in finding the money had to wait for service to become available lack of information on phone options had to go to another town to get connected waiting time of over 1 year too much paper work had to make many visits to office had to pay bribes wasn't treated well because didn't have 'contacts' phone did not get connected immediately no difficulties % who faced difficulty India Sri Lanka Base: SL: 212 India: 647 (fixed owners) {20.2} shoestrings/LIRNEasia/ColNewsConf 19Dec05
41
Obtaining a mobile connection: it’s relatively easier…
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 difficulty in finding the money had to wait for service to become available lack of information on phone options had to go to another town to get connected waiting time of over 1 year too much paper work had to make many visits to office had to pay bribes wasn't treated well because didn't have 'contacts' phone did not get connected immediately no difficulties % who faced difficulty India Sri Lanka Base: SL: 322 India: 187 (mobile owners) {20.2.1} shoestrings/LIRNEasia/ColNewsConf 19Dec05
42
Cost of using the phone: Mobile is perceived to be the least affordable
100 80 extremely high / very high / high 60 extr.high/v.high/high % of users who find the cost... affordable 40 Full sample Bases fixed: 1580 {7.5} 20 affordable public: 2106 mobile: 616 Fixed Public Mobile mode of access shoestrings/LIRNEasia/ColNewsConf 19Dec05
43
But more affordable in India
100 extremely high / very high / high 80 60 % of users who find the cost... 40 Bases SL: 374 India: 242 20 affordable {7.4} affordable Sri Lanka India Mobile affordable extr.high/v.high/high shoestrings/LIRNEasia/ColNewsConf 19Dec05
44
Fixed users spend less than USD4 per month (approx)
shoestrings/LIRNEasia/ColNewsConf 19Dec05
45
Mobile users spending much higher amounts
shoestrings/LIRNEasia/ColNewsConf 19Dec05
46
33 % of Jaffna sample spend more than USD12 per month on mobile
shoestrings/LIRNEasia/ColNewsConf 19Dec05
47
‘on average, around the world, people spend about 2-3% of their income on telecommunication’
Telecommunications Regulation Handbook, infoDev, module 6, p.6.6 Graph taken from Telecommunications Regulation Handbook, infoDev; module 6 shoestrings/LIRNEasia/ColNewsConf 19Dec05
48
Rural respondents perceive fixed phones to be more affordable, and less likely to change use if price changed Perception of current costs Base: fixed (only) users Change in usage if costs were halved Reflects telecom/transportation trade-off Access deficit charge in India ensures lower cost of rural fixed phones shoestrings/LIRNEasia/ColNewsConf 19Dec05
49
Mobiles perceived to be more costly & use would increase if costs were halved; rural users a little happier about cost Perception of current costs Base: mobile (only) users Change in usage if costs were halved Reflects the said reasons for choice of mobile : convenience shoestrings/LIRNEasia/ColNewsConf 19Dec05
50
Public access: more affordable in rural areas
Perception of current costs Base: Public access (only) users Change in usage if costs were halved Despite respondents in India perceiving current costs to be affordable, they are willing to increase phone usage if costs were halved. shoestrings/LIRNEasia/ColNewsConf 19Dec05
51
Difficulties in use of fixed phones
20 40 60 80 phone is often disconnected repair time is too long repair costs are too high inaccurate billing bill is not reader-friendly have to travel far to pay bills get disconnected without warning (red notice) no difficulties % who faced difficulty India Sri Lanka Base: SL: 212 India: 647 (fixed owners) {22.1a} shoestrings/LIRNEasia/ColNewsConf 19Dec05
52
Less complaints about mobile use
20 40 60 80 Phone is often disconnected cannot make calls despite having credit Some features don't always work Difficult to make/receive calls no difficulties % who faced difficulty India Sri Lanka Base: SL: 322 India: 187 (mobile owners) {22.1b} shoestrings/LIRNEasia/ColNewsConf 19Dec05
53
Problems with the connection: fixed
10 20 30 40 50 60 % who face difficulty India Sri Lanka Base: SL: 212 India: 647 (fixed owners) Cannot get a call through Poor audio connection (including cross connections) Weak signal Line disconnection due to not paying the bill on time Customer service is not efficient Calls dropped {22.2b} shoestrings/LIRNEasia/ColNewsConf 19Dec05
54
Problems with connection: mobile
Problems with connection: mobile - some complaints of poor quality connection {22.2b} shoestrings/LIRNEasia/ColNewsConf 19Dec05
55
In conclusion Neglected, silent group of consumers
Most rely on shared access Little discretion Not entirely happy with cost, esp. on mobile Spend considerable amount on telecom services shoestrings/LIRNEasia/ColNewsConf 19Dec05
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.