Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Scoring for modified drop-jump test.

Published byMichelina Sacco Modified over 5 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Scoring for modified drop-jump test."— Presentation transcript:

1 Scoring for modified drop-jump test.
Scoring for modified drop-jump test. A score of 3 is ideal with neutral position of the knees over the foot with no varus or valgus deformity. A score of 2 demonstrates mild valgus with some portion of the knee still above the foot. A score of 4 represents mild varus with some portion of the knee still above the foot. A score of 1 or 5 represents extreme varus or valgus position on landing. Allison B Hutchinson et al. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med 2016;2:e000135 ©2016 by BMJ Publishing Group Ltd

Download ppt "Scoring for modified drop-jump test."

Similar presentations

Percentage of anaerobic threshold–metabolic equivalent (MET) relationship during the 10 m shuttle walking test with cones for post-myocardial  infarction.

Percentage of anaerobic threshold–metabolic equivalent (MET) relationship during the 10 m shuttle walking test with cones for post-myocardial  infarction.
Graph of serum [Na+] versus urine osmolality, when all data points (n=318) were combined. Graph of serum [Na+] versus urine osmolality, when all data points.

Graph of serum [Na+] versus urine osmolality, when all data points (n=318) were combined. Graph of serum [Na+] versus urine osmolality, when all data points.
Demonstration of Helicobacter pylori by the four staining methods: (A) modified Giemsa, (B) anti-H pylori antibody immunostain, (C) modified McMullen's.

Demonstration of Helicobacter pylori by the four staining methods: (A) modified Giemsa, (B) anti-H pylori antibody immunostain, (C) modified McMullen's.
The differences in sedentary behaviour and physical activity levels between the CVD groups*. The differences in sedentary behaviour and physical activity.

The differences in sedentary behaviour and physical activity levels between the CVD groups*. The differences in sedentary behaviour and physical activity.
Changes in physical fitness between baseline, 3-month and 12-month follow-up: (A) Mobility limitations in neck-shoulder area; % with severe limitations,

Changes in physical fitness between baseline, 3-month and 12-month follow-up: (A) Mobility limitations in neck-shoulder area; % with severe limitations,
Common foot operations for Charcot–Marie–Tooth disease and related disorders. Common foot operations for Charcot–Marie–Tooth disease and related disorders.

Common foot operations for Charcot–Marie–Tooth disease and related disorders. Common foot operations for Charcot–Marie–Tooth disease and related disorders.
Bland-Altman plot comparing average steps/day over a 7-day period for the Fitbit tracker and ActiGraph accelerometer. Bland-Altman plot comparing average.

Bland-Altman plot comparing average steps/day over a 7-day period for the Fitbit tracker and ActiGraph accelerometer. Bland-Altman plot comparing average.
Bland-Altman plots comparing step counts over a 2 min walk test for the Fitbit tracker, ActiGraph accelerometer and visual count by a physiotherapist.

Bland-Altman plots comparing step counts over a 2 min walk test for the Fitbit tracker, ActiGraph accelerometer and visual count by a physiotherapist.
 Trends in incidence rates of reported work related injuries and illnesses in jobs with and without exposure, for two exposure categories (hours/week and.

 Trends in incidence rates of reported work related injuries and illnesses in jobs with and without exposure, for two exposure categories (hours/week and.
Masashi Maeda et al. Heart Asia 2013;5:7-14

Masashi Maeda et al. Heart Asia 2013;5:7-14
Percentage change in oedema levels between pre-exercise, immediately postexercise and 48 hours postexercise grouped by condition (SS, static stretching;

Percentage change in oedema levels between pre-exercise, immediately postexercise and 48 hours postexercise grouped by condition (SS, static stretching;
Effect of confidence interval reduction to demonstrate a true difference in means. Effect of confidence interval reduction to demonstrate a true difference.

Effect of confidence interval reduction to demonstrate a true difference in means. Effect of confidence interval reduction to demonstrate a true difference.
Distribution of percentage compliance during the intervention period for Sch-I and Sch-V. Distribution of percentage compliance during the intervention.

Distribution of percentage compliance during the intervention period for Sch-I and Sch-V. Distribution of percentage compliance during the intervention.
PRISMA flow chart illustrating study inclusions through the stages of the systematic review. PRISMA flow chart illustrating study inclusions through the.

PRISMA flow chart illustrating study inclusions through the stages of the systematic review. PRISMA flow chart illustrating study inclusions through the.
The proposed new evidence-based medicine pyramid.

The proposed new evidence-based medicine pyramid.
(A) Schematic of roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis bead pair placement in relation to tear. (A) Schematic of roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis.

(A) Schematic of roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis bead pair placement in relation to tear. (A) Schematic of roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis.
Harvest plot of intervention effects on muscle physical activity levels. Harvest plot of intervention effects on muscle physical activity levels. Each.

Harvest plot of intervention effects on muscle physical activity levels. Harvest plot of intervention effects on muscle physical activity levels. Each.
Clinical course of participants with high cardiovascular risk profile

Clinical course of participants with high cardiovascular risk profile
Interpretation of results presented as heat maps and heat map results for the exercise subtests, ranked by the total Functional Movement Screen (FMS) score.

Interpretation of results presented as heat maps and heat map results for the exercise subtests, ranked by the total Functional Movement Screen (FMS) score.
Each circle represents the outcome of one patient, but sometimes the circles are very close or even merge. Each circle represents the outcome of one patient,

Each circle represents the outcome of one patient, but sometimes the circles are very close or even merge. Each circle represents the outcome of one patient,

Similar presentations

Ads by Google