Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byCharlotta Pålsson Modified over 5 years ago
1
Minimally invasive versus sternotomy approaches for mitral reconstruction: Comparison of intermediate-term results Eugene A. Grossi, MD, Angelo LaPietra, MD, Greg H. Ribakove, MD, Julie Delianides, MA, Rick Esposito, MD, Alfred T. Culliford, MD, Christopher C. Derivaux, MD, Robert M. Applebaum, MD, Itzhak Kronzon, MD, Bryan M. Steinberg, MD, F.Gregory Baumann, PhD, Aubrey C. Galloway, MD, Stephen B. Colvin, MD The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Volume 121, Issue 4, Pages (April 2001) DOI: /mtc Copyright © 2001 American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions
2
Fig. 1 A, Cumulative survival from late cardiac death. B, Cumulative survival from all late death. SS, Standard sternotomy approach; MI, minimally invasive approach. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery , DOI: ( /mtc ) Copyright © 2001 American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions
3
Fig. 2 Cumulative survival from mitral reoperation of any cause. SS, Standard sternotomy approach; MI, minimally invasive approach. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery , DOI: ( /mtc ) Copyright © 2001 American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions
4
Fig. 3 Cumulative survival from all valve-related complications (anticoagulant, endocarditis, and thromoembolic) and mitral reoperations. SS, Standard sternotomy approach; MI, minimally invasive approach. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery , DOI: ( /mtc ) Copyright © 2001 American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.