1. 802.11 WG Editor’s Meeting (Mar ‘10)
July 2007
Mar 2010
WG Editor’s Meeting (Mar ‘10)
Date:
Authors:
Peter Ecclesine (Cisco Systems)
Peter Ecclesine (Cisco Systems)

2. Volunteer Editor Contacts
Mar 2010
July 2007
Volunteer Editor Contacts
TGp – Wayne Fisher –
TGs – Kazuyuki Sakoda -
TGu – Necati Canpolat –
TGv – Emily Qi –
TGz – Menzo Wentink–
TGmb – Adrian Stephens – (TBC)
TGaa – Hang Liu –
Editor Emeritus:
TGk – Joe Kwak–
TGn – Adrian Stephens –
TGr – Bill Marshall –
TGw – Nancy Cam-Winget –
TGy – Peter Ecclesine –
Peter Ecclesine (Cisco Systems)
Peter Ecclesine (Cisco Systems)

3. Two Technical Editors Peter Ecclesine runs the face to face meetings
Mar 2010
Two Technical Editors
Peter Ecclesine runs the face to face meetings
Adrian Stephens runs the publication process
Matthew Gast is the ANA administrator
Peter Ecclesine (Cisco Systems)

4. Editor Amendment Ordering
July 2007
Mar 2010
Amendment numbering is editorial! No need to make ballot comments on these dynamic numbers!
Editor Amendment Ordering
Data as of Mar 2010
See
Amendment Number
Task Group
REVCOM Date
Amendment 6
TGp
June 2010
Amendment 7
TGz
Sept 2010
Amendment 8
TGv
Amendment 9
TGu
Amendment 10
TGs
Jan 2011
Revision
802.11mb
June 2011
Amendment 1
TGaa
Oct 2011
Amendment 2
TGac
Dec 2012
Amendment 3
TGad
Amendment 4
TGae
Jun 2012
Amendment 5
TGaf
Peter Ecclesine (Cisco Systems)
Peter Ecclesine (Cisco Systems)

5. Draft Development Snapshot
July 2009
July 2007
Mar 2010
Draft Development Snapshot
Most current doc shaded green.
Changes from last report shown in red. TG
Published or Draft Baseline Documents
Source
MEC
Style Guide
Editor
Snapshot Date
802.11 k r y w n z p v u s mb aa
2007
2008
10.0
11.0 .0
Word
Yes
Menzo Wentink
17-July
2009
Frame 7.2
Wayne Fisher
16-Mar
6.0
9.0
7.03 No
Emily Qi
18-Nov
7.0
8.03
Necati Canpolat
8.0
4.01
Frame 8.0
Kazuyuki Sakoda
2007 Inc
2008 Inc
2009 Inc -
2.01
Adrian Stephens
18-Jan
4.0
3.0
0.02
Hang Liu
Slide 5
Peter Ecclesine (Cisco Systems)
Page 5
Peter Ecclesine (Cisco Systems)

6. 802.11 Style Guide See 11-09-1034-00-0000-wg11-style-guide.doc
These style practices are to be followed when submitting drafts for Working Group consideration
Peter Ecclesine (Cisco Systems)

7. Pre-RevCom IEEE-SA Review
Mar 2010
Pre-RevCom IEEE-SA Review
Possibly near the end of Sponsor Ballot (3rd recirc or 4th recirc) , we would offer the draft to the publications editor for review. This allows ambiguities and errors to be addressed in Sponsor Ballot by comments, rather than discover the ambiguities and errors after RevCom.
A downside is the possibility that many pages are touched by the changes (like renaming), and voters reopen text that has been stable for new comments.
It appears that during MEC is the least risky time for a publication editor’s review.
Another choice is after initial Sponsor Ballot. We will ask if it is valid to make editorial changes between EC approval and initial sponsor ballot.
Peter Ecclesine (Cisco Systems)