1. Academic Achievement Report for Washington Manor Middle School 2007-08

2. The Moral Purpose
To support every student at Washington Manor Middle School as if he/she were our own child.

3. Session Outcomes
Review the key strategic initiatives that we implemented as a school community last year
Predict our student performance on the CST aligned to our strategic initiatives
Review our actual student performance on the CST linked to our strategic initiatives
Work in grade level teams to follow a similar inquiry process to review our grade level CST data.
Review our AYP and API status.

4. The Leadership and Learning Matrix
Lucky
High results, low understanding of implementation components
Replication of success unlikely
Leading
High results, high understanding of implementation components
Replication of success likely
Student Achievement
Losing
Low results, low understanding of implementation components
Learning
Low results, high understanding of implementation components
Replication of mistakes unlikely
Degree and Quality of Implementation
Center for Performance Assessment

5. Our Collective Expectation for Student Achievement
Our staff holds ourselves collectively responsible to ensure that every student within our school achieves academic success by:
Engaging all students in instructional activities that are real world, relevant and standards aligned.
Helping students establish meaningful learning targets where they are able to align their work with exemplary grade level work and then plan to achieve this level of work with teacher and fellow student support.
Providing all students with timely descriptive feedback that supports student achievement in an ongoing manner.
Celebrating student success both formally and informally

6. Specific Strategic Initiatives
Initiative Description
Student Group Focus
Expected CST Performance
Student intervention program for students scoring at the Basic Level in ELA and Math
In class focus for students scoring Below Basic and Far Below Basic in ELA and Mathematics
Reading First Coach for Grades K-3
Math Coach

7. Washington Manor Middle Demographics – Enrollment Over Time

8. Washington Manor Middle CST ELA Performance Overall

9. Washington Manor Middle CST ELA Performance by Level

10. Washington Manor Middle CST ELA Performance by Grade

11. Washington Manor Middle CST ELA Performance by Subgroup

12. Washington Manor Middle CST ELA Performance by Subgroup 2

13. Washington Manor Middle School Footprint ELA:CST 2007- 2008
Advanced
13% / 102
Proficient
33% /259
350
33% /257
13% /105
Basic
Below Basic
Below Basic
# Students Tested: 788
8% /65
Far Below Basic
8/21/08

14. Washington Manor Middle CST Math Performance

15. Washington Manor Middle CST Math Performance

16. Washington Manor Middle CST Math Performance by Grade Level

17. Washington Manor Middle CST Math Performance by Subgroup

18. Washington Manor Middle CST Math Performance by Subgroup 2

19. Washington Manor Middle School Footprint Math: CST 2007- 2008
Advanced
Proficient
15% /74
31% /150
350
31% /153
17% /84
Basic
Below Basic
Below Basic
# Students Tested 492
6% /31
Far Below Basic
8/21/08

20. Washington Manor Middle CST Algebra I Performance

21. Washington Manor Middle CST Algebra I Performance

22. Washington Manor Middle CST Algebra I Performance by Grade Level

23. Washington Manor Middle CST Algebra I Performance by Subgroup

24. Washington Manor Middle CST Algebra I Performance by Subgroup 2

25. Washington Manor Middle School Footprint Algebra I: CST 2007- 2008
Advanced
Proficient
15% /19
36% /46
350
30% /39
17% /22
Basic
Below Basic
Below Basic
# Students Tested 492
2% /3
Far Below Basic
8/21/08

26. Inquiry Questions What were your goals for students last year?
What strategies did we employ to ensure that all students achieved the standards-aligned achievement targets?
What are your predictions about student performance for your grade level?
Use the tools in the following slides to help you carry out your grade level inquiry.

27. Inquiry Protocol

28. Inquiry Protocol

29. Inquiry Protocol

30. Inquiry Protocol

31. Inquiry Protocol

32. Comparing AYP and API Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
AYP and Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs)
Academic Performance Index (API)
Performance Levels
Proficient
Not Proficient
Advanced (1000)
Proficient (875)
Basic (700)
Below Basic (500)
Far Below Basic (200)
Calculation
Percentage of students who score proficient or advanced in Math and ELA as defined by each state
Student performance levels for multiple content areas are weighted and used to develop an index score that is measured and compared over two years to show growth

33. API Growth for Washington Manor Middle for School and Subgroups

34. API Growth for Washington Manor Middle for School

35. API Growth for Washington Manor Middle for Subgroups

36. API Growth for Washington Manor Middle for Subgroups

37. Did we Meet our API Growth Targets for 2008?
API Group
API Base Score for 2007
API Growth Score for 2008
API Growth Target for 2008
Did we Meet Our API Growth Target for 2008
Overall School
716
724 5
Yes
Asian
827
829 _
Hispanic
675
672 6 No
Economically Disadvantaged
697
698 EL
688
White
702

38. ELA AYP Growth for Washington Manor Middle for School by Subgroup

39. ELA AYP Growth for Washington Manor Middle for School by Subgroup

40. Math AYP Growth for Washington Manor Middle for School by Subgroup

41. Math AYP Growth for Washington Manor Middle for School by Subgroup

42. Did we Meet our AYP Targets in 2008
AYP Group
ELA Participation
(95%)
ELA % Proficient or Advanced
(35.2%)
Math Participation
Math Proficient or Advanced
(37%)
Overall School
100%
45.6%
99%
39.6%
Hispanic
35.4%
28.6% EL
35.1%
36.3%
Economically Disadvantaged
38.1%
33.3%
White
45.7%
35.0%

43. Academic Achievement Report for Washington Manor Middle School 2007-08