Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

State CP Model (“Discussion Draft”)

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "State CP Model (“Discussion Draft”)"— Presentation transcript:

1 State CP Model (“Discussion Draft”)
Snowmass PKI Summit Art Vandenberg Advanced Campus Services Georgia State University

2 A Summary State CP Model: not a CP for public key certificates, but a policy for e-signing? Influenced by State activities in Citizen CRM Driven top-down PKI isn’t “the” e-signing solution PKI is a tool, not the end “Discussion Draft” August 9, 2001 State CP

3 Context of e-sign services
Providing signing services - as in contracts and agreements Perhaps limited need for interoperation Looks to cross certification as solution to lesser problem: State to state in regional context With Federal agencies On a scale of 50 states, not universities August 9, 2001 State CP

4 One OID for Policy Single level of assurance mapping
Defines limited application area for certs Works in the “enterprise mode” of a State environment? (applications understand the certs and assurances) Think of it as a “PKI-Lite” approach It is a “Draft” – change is an option August 9, 2001 State CP

5 Developed in the Community
NECCC (National Electronic Commerce Coordinating Council) State Auditors, Procurement officers, Secretaries of State, Governors, Chief Administrators… and CIO Focus on improving State infrastructure for government SERVICES PKI is not the end, but a tool August 9, 2001 State CP

6 Technology Basis States do not enjoy higher ed’s connectivity
Broadband initiatives: Internet is still being developed (much less Internet2/Abilene…) Digital Divide: enfranchising the people (just like in our dorms!) Anonymity is not the issue – States expect to know identity of citizens applying for services Privacy means: “How’re you using my data?” August 9, 2001 State CP

7 Bottom Line Top down approach to e-signing
Specifically limited cert application: Confidentiality/encryption Digital signing (medium & high Digital Notary Not Anonymous Strengths: governing law, auditing, financial responsibility, liability/risk, operational Opportunity to link efforts August 9, 2001 State CP

8 Other observations NECCC Activities a Clue: Broadband Digital divide
Portals Justice Agencies Sharing Initiative Privacy Funding August 9, 2001 State CP

9 Internet2-like Activities
The Center for Technology in Government to search for e-government best practices. Practitioners of e-government have the promise of a road map in their quest to implement best practices. August 9, 2001 State CP


Download ppt "State CP Model (“Discussion Draft”)"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google