Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Management of knowledge
Some issues for achieving formal uniformity and academic criteria in the current context of Open Science Nelson H. S. Ferreira (orcid.org/ ) Centro de Estudos Clássicos e Humanísticos da Universidade de Coimbra CLASSICA DIGITALIA/IUC
3
Publishing ‘open science’
Verify & validate (structures in the cloud) Scientific method + data accuracy Formal structure Revision, correction, adjustment and editing Proofs and publishing ‘Open Science’ adjustment to social context
4
resources as guidelines for a strategy
coordination Editorial board Triage team Specialization (definition of specialization fields) 'peer-review process’ (referees) formal rules for publishing Editorial assistant (adaptation of texts) Technical editor (achieving publishable format) Proofs and review Publishing and marketing Data Saving and Data Sharing (Open Source)
5
Examples of imported scripts - ‘failures’ (⍯Unicode)
DOCX IDML
6
Synergies – institutional blockchain
publishers Authors students Academic institutions Researchers R&D Units/ laboratories Corporations, Enterprises, ONG, Foundations
7
Considering resources
HR Referees, researchers, authors, editorial boards, editors/coordination, technical editors, students, administrative workers/partners… technical structure Software, Hardware, Technical Editors, Data Bases, Technical Expertise… institutional Agreements, Departmental Collaborations/Roles, Corporations, ONG, Colleges, R&D Units/Labs, Foundations… Communication / divulgation strategy/ business model Social Context, Community, Business Canvas, Webpage, Marketing, Network Assets, Media, Partners… budgets Generated Income, Scholarships, Sponsorships, Operation Cost, Investment, Philanthropy, Fixed Budgets, Public Support Variability…
8
A publisher as another engine of an Academic / Scientific Institution: HR for ‘peer review’
How many reviewers are available in general and what kind of relation they have with the institution. What kind of agreement can be made with the referee. Ex. an agreement for reading 3 articles/chapters per/year. Which fields have more demand of expertise – foreknowledge for necessary specialists. Should one create a referee’s bank? How can one reward referee’s commitment and dedication besides paying for her/his dedication? Should referees take training? How can one integrate these procedures in the general affairs of the institution
9
Ex.: importation from ‘docx’ to ‘Adobe Indesign’
‘Ghost styles’
10
Creating bibliographies and generating bibtext data files
11
Definitions of visualization; defining bookmarks
Editing pdf
12
Integrated structures for preserving data & diffusion of ‘Open Science’
Institutional Data deposits Open source databases ‘Bibtext’ files Data recovery Editable original files Cloud (restrict access) Edition by authors, editorial boards, editors, technical editors open reviews by peers Publishers storage of printed materials Catalogues updating + diffusion of Open Science publishing and publicising digital materials
13
Collaboration between academic departments and research Units/ Labs
Geography Design of mapping, geographic databases, digital tools, expertise knowledge… Engineering Coding, mathematics, experimental essays, expertise knowledge… Art & Letters Revisions, adaptation of texts, expertise knowledge… Economics / management Optimization of processes, expertise knowledge… Art & design Expertise and improvement of publishable materials, expertise knowledge…
14
Master and Doctoral programs enrolled in the process of publishing
Training + analysis + criticism + debate Triage as a ‘defined element’ of the publisher structure Authors, students and researchers as elements of triage teams Promote integration of authors and students in the process of publishing Professionalization of referees Referees’ training Association with academic institutions through doctoral programs Bank of referees ‘Referees exchange’ Institutional collaboration as philosophy of action Sharing software, hardware/infrastructures Sharing referees Sharing knowledge Collaborative budgets Potentiate work in the cloud improvement of procedures: edition, revision, management of databases and data stores Training of collaborators /professionalisation of processes synergies with academic institutions Integrate technical knowledge in MA and Doctoral programs Consider science/knowledge managers as a professional career proposals
15
Thank you!
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.