Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Subcellular distribution of TACE-eGFP changes with the coexpression of active ERK2. Subcellular distribution of TACE-eGFP changes with the coexpression.

Published byKetil Hoff Modified over 5 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Subcellular distribution of TACE-eGFP changes with the coexpression of active ERK2. Subcellular distribution of TACE-eGFP changes with the coexpression."— Presentation transcript:

1 Subcellular distribution of TACE-eGFP changes with the coexpression of active ERK2.
Subcellular distribution of TACE-eGFP changes with the coexpression of active ERK2. (A) HeLa cells were transfected with either 0.3 μg pWT.TACE-GFP or pT735A.TACE-eGFP, with or without 0.1 μg of pCA.MEK-1.HA and/or pWT.ERK2-HA. DNA amounts were kept equivalent using pcDNA3.1+/Zeo. Cells were fixed in methanol and stained for constitutively active MEK-1 (α-MEK-1), WT.ERK-HA (α-HA), or active phosphor-ERK2 (α-pERK2 in B), before being visualised using laser-scanning confocal microscopy. TACE-eGFP, CA.MEK-1 and/or ERK2 are green and red respectively, whereas the nuclei are blue. The arrowheads highlight a change in the subcellular location of TACE-eGFP protein. Bar, 10 μm. Surinder M. Soond et al. J Cell Sci 2005;118: © The Company of Biologists Limited 2005

Download ppt "Subcellular distribution of TACE-eGFP changes with the coexpression of active ERK2. Subcellular distribution of TACE-eGFP changes with the coexpression."

Similar presentations

Relocalisation of both MK5 and ERK3 requires a CRM1‐dependent nuclear export pathway. Relocalisation of both MK5 and ERK3 requires a CRM1‐dependent nuclear.

Relocalisation of both MK5 and ERK3 requires a CRM1‐dependent nuclear export pathway. Relocalisation of both MK5 and ERK3 requires a CRM1‐dependent nuclear.
Relationship between adhesion plaque formation, FAK/ERK signaling, and proliferation. Relationship between adhesion plaque formation, FAK/ERK signaling,

Relationship between adhesion plaque formation, FAK/ERK signaling, and proliferation. Relationship between adhesion plaque formation, FAK/ERK signaling,
Scanning electron microscopy analysis of EGK-I to -V chick embryos.

Scanning electron microscopy analysis of EGK-I to -V chick embryos.
Endogenous SRP19 is localized to the nucleus and the nucleolus.

Endogenous SRP19 is localized to the nucleus and the nucleolus.
Candidates with a PVM localization.

Candidates with a PVM localization.
Subcellular localization of UUKV, HRTV, and SFTSV NSs

Subcellular localization of UUKV, HRTV, and SFTSV NSs
Role of adaptor-binding motifs in export and segregation of endolysosomal proteins at the Golgi complex. Role of adaptor-binding motifs in export and segregation.

Role of adaptor-binding motifs in export and segregation of endolysosomal proteins at the Golgi complex. Role of adaptor-binding motifs in export and segregation.
Localization of PBANKA_1229000 and PBANKA_0924800 during blood and liver stage development. Localization of PBANKA_1229000 and PBANKA_0924800 during blood.

Localization of PBANKA_ and PBANKA_ during blood and liver stage development. Localization of PBANKA_ and PBANKA_ during blood.
DIA1(R1204X) induces elongated and thick microvilli in HeLa cells

DIA1(R1204X) induces elongated and thick microvilli in HeLa cells
Endogenous SMN1 is not recruited to stress granules in HeLa cells after diverse stresses. Endogenous SMN1 is not recruited to stress granules in HeLa cells.

Endogenous SMN1 is not recruited to stress granules in HeLa cells after diverse stresses. Endogenous SMN1 is not recruited to stress granules in HeLa cells.
Evaluation of LC3 and ATG13 dynamics in AS-stimulated microglial cells using live-imaging. Evaluation of LC3 and ATG13 dynamics in AS-stimulated microglial.

Evaluation of LC3 and ATG13 dynamics in AS-stimulated microglial cells using live-imaging. Evaluation of LC3 and ATG13 dynamics in AS-stimulated microglial.
Recruitment of PH-Akt-GFP to the leading edge of the cell during chemotaxis. Recruitment of PH-Akt-GFP to the leading edge of the cell during chemotaxis.

Recruitment of PH-Akt-GFP to the leading edge of the cell during chemotaxis. Recruitment of PH-Akt-GFP to the leading edge of the cell during chemotaxis.
Fig. 1. Representative images of the four cell lines using fluorescence microscopy. Representative images of the four cell lines using fluorescence microscopy.

Fig. 1. Representative images of the four cell lines using fluorescence microscopy. Representative images of the four cell lines using fluorescence microscopy.
A highly conserved six-amino-acid region in the C-terminal CT domain of MARCH8 is responsible for its ability to downregulate TfR. A highly conserved six-amino-acid.

A highly conserved six-amino-acid region in the C-terminal CT domain of MARCH8 is responsible for its ability to downregulate TfR. A highly conserved six-amino-acid.
The effects of a dominant negative mutant of lamin B1 on lamin distribution in HeLa cells. The effects of a dominant negative mutant of lamin B1 on lamin.

The effects of a dominant negative mutant of lamin B1 on lamin distribution in HeLa cells. The effects of a dominant negative mutant of lamin B1 on lamin.
Fig. 5. Expression of either dFMRP or human FMRP does not induce eIF2α phosphorylation.(A) Analysis of eIF2α phosphorylation upon dFMRP expression. Expression.

Fig. 5. Expression of either dFMRP or human FMRP does not induce eIF2α phosphorylation.(A) Analysis of eIF2α phosphorylation upon dFMRP expression. Expression.
PfSec13 does not co-localize with P. falciparum heterochromatin.

PfSec13 does not co-localize with P. falciparum heterochromatin.
Fig. 3. Characterization of unclassified cells (UCs).

Fig. 3. Characterization of unclassified cells (UCs).
Aggresome formation of STAT5A_ΔE18.

Aggresome formation of STAT5A_ΔE18.
Fig. 3. Rnd proteins induce stronger responses in subconfluent endothelial cells.HUVECs were transfected with Rnd1, Rnd2, Rnd3 or GFP-encoding plasmids.

Fig. 3. Rnd proteins induce stronger responses in subconfluent endothelial cells.HUVECs were transfected with Rnd1, Rnd2, Rnd3 or GFP-encoding plasmids.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google