Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Differentiation of neural crest cells into corneal endothelial cells

Published byEustace McDowell Modified over 5 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Differentiation of neural crest cells into corneal endothelial cells"— Presentation transcript:

1 Fig. 2. Differentiation of neural crest cells into corneal endothelial cells.
Differentiation of neural crest cells into corneal endothelial cells. (A) Representative light micrographs of neural crest cells differentiating into corneal endothelial cells at 9 (D9), 24 (D24), 52 (D52) and 84 (D84) days post-CEnC induction. Insets (i) in each panel show higher magnification views to better display changes in cell morphology throughout the differentiation process. (B) Rt-PCR for CEnC-specific transcripts comparing undifferentiated iPSCs and day 16 NCCs (D16 NCCs) to differentiated cells at 8, 13, 20, 37, 52 and 84 days post-CEnC induction. POLR2A served as a control transcript. (C) Representative immunocytochemical labeling of differentiated cells at 52 days post-CEnC induction with the CEnC-specific markers, zonula occludens-1 (upper left; ZO-1, green), N-Cadherin (upper right; N-Cad, red), Aquaporin-1 (lower left; AQP-1, green) and Na+/K+ATPase (lower right, green). DAPI was used to counterstain cell nuclei. Insets (i) in each panel show higher magnification views. (D) Representative immunocytochemical labeling of differentiated cells at 84 days post-CEnC induction with ZO-1 (upper left, green), N-Cad (upper right, red), AQP-1 (lower left, green) and Na+/K+ATPase (lower right, green). DAPI was used to counterstain cell nuclei. Insets (i) in each panel show higher magnification views. Scale bars: 400 µm in A; 200 µm in C,D. Michael D. Wagoner et al. Biology Open 2018;7:bio032102 © Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd

Download ppt "Differentiation of neural crest cells into corneal endothelial cells"

Similar presentations

Figure 5. Tbr2 and Tbr2-GFP expression in P7 cortex

Figure 5. Tbr2 and Tbr2-GFP expression in P7 cortex
Fig. 1. Neurosphere formation and differentiation of the subventricular zone (SVZ) neural stem and progenitor cells (NS/PCs). (A) Isolated neurospheres.

Fig. 1. Neurosphere formation and differentiation of the subventricular zone (SVZ) neural stem and progenitor cells (NS/PCs). (A) Isolated neurospheres.
Disrupted dynamics of early stages of differentiation perturbs neural cell fate specification. Disrupted dynamics of early stages of differentiation perturbs.

Disrupted dynamics of early stages of differentiation perturbs neural cell fate specification. Disrupted dynamics of early stages of differentiation perturbs.
Fig. 2 In vitro assessment of hESC-RPE cell sheets.

Fig. 2 In vitro assessment of hESC-RPE cell sheets.
Isaac Perea-Gil et al. BTS 2016;1:

Isaac Perea-Gil et al. BTS 2016;1:
Distinct collagen structures in the upper and lower neonatal dermis (related to Fig 1)‏ Distinct collagen structures in the upper and lower neonatal dermis.

Distinct collagen structures in the upper and lower neonatal dermis (related to Fig 1)‏ Distinct collagen structures in the upper and lower neonatal dermis.
YAP1 and IGF2BP3 regulate each other during fetal programming.

YAP1 and IGF2BP3 regulate each other during fetal programming.
Fig. 1 Characterization of hESC-RPE cells.

Fig. 1 Characterization of hESC-RPE cells.
Fig. 5. Prip silencing enhances the co-localization of GABARAP with insulin vesicles and β-tubulin.Co-localization of GABARAP (green) with insulin (red)

Fig. 5. Prip silencing enhances the co-localization of GABARAP with insulin vesicles and β-tubulin.Co-localization of GABARAP (green) with insulin (red)
Fig. 1. Overview of the nervous system of the adult S. roscoffensis.

Fig. 1. Overview of the nervous system of the adult S. roscoffensis.
Instigating, noninstigating, and responding human tumor specimens.

Instigating, noninstigating, and responding human tumor specimens.
Fig. 8. CCA and ChQ treatment induce accumulation of F-actin rings.

Fig. 8. CCA and ChQ treatment induce accumulation of F-actin rings.
Fig. 3. Hts and Dlg are in a complex at the postsynaptic membrane of larval NMJs.(A–B″) PLA with HtsM and Dlg antibodies (green) performed on third instar.

Fig. 3. Hts and Dlg are in a complex at the postsynaptic membrane of larval NMJs.(A–B″) PLA with HtsM and Dlg antibodies (green) performed on third instar.
Fig. 1. Representative images of the four cell lines using fluorescence microscopy. Representative images of the four cell lines using fluorescence microscopy.

Fig. 1. Representative images of the four cell lines using fluorescence microscopy. Representative images of the four cell lines using fluorescence microscopy.
Temporal dynamics of the primitive streak and mesoderm progenitors in β-catenin-activated hES cells. Temporal dynamics of the primitive streak and mesoderm.

Temporal dynamics of the primitive streak and mesoderm progenitors in β-catenin-activated hES cells. Temporal dynamics of the primitive streak and mesoderm.
Fig. 2. Morphological changes of cultured adherent fibroblastic cells after OA treatment related to actin microfilament reorganization.(A) Cells observed.

Fig. 2. Morphological changes of cultured adherent fibroblastic cells after OA treatment related to actin microfilament reorganization.(A) Cells observed.
Fig. 5. Differentiated cells sort to the outer layer, regardless of E- or N-cadherin status.Wildtype and mutant ES cells were distinguished by GFP expression.

Fig. 5. Differentiated cells sort to the outer layer, regardless of E- or N-cadherin status.Wildtype and mutant ES cells were distinguished by GFP expression.
Fig. 7. Motion adaptation increases time-dependent response modulations (TDRM) relatively to the average cell response.TDRM normalized to the value obtained.

Fig. 7. Motion adaptation increases time-dependent response modulations (TDRM) relatively to the average cell response.TDRM normalized to the value obtained.
Fig. 4. Seeding density modulates cell shape in both cell types

Fig. 4. Seeding density modulates cell shape in both cell types
Fig. 6. Hts regulates par-1 and camkII mRNA distribution and levels in the muscle.(A–J) Views of muscles 6/7 in abdominal segment 4, probed for either.

Fig. 6. Hts regulates par-1 and camkII mRNA distribution and levels in the muscle.(A–J) Views of muscles 6/7 in abdominal segment 4, probed for either.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google