1. SL 2018 conference F’back
4-5 May 2018

2. DAY 1 Q1.Conference Excellent 50.88 Good 31.58 -------- 82.46
Satisfactory
Poor

3. Comments It was good and fun.
It was the best conference I join in. The organizing committee did their best, and they were so lovely and welcoming to everyone. The speakers were inspiring, and also perfect models. As a prospective teacher whose mind is so confused, this conference opened up my horizon and also made me self-sufficient. Before this conference, I just thought that I would be a teacher, a good teacher. Now, I want to be one of those speakers who inspire people and touch their lives. Thank you so much! I look forward to joining in your next event!
It was a pity that we had to choose one invited speaker out of many good ones. I was curious about the others, too. Of course it might be due to time constraints. However, it would be great if invited speakers could be recorded on video and available for us participants to watch later on.
I think it was a small scale but successful conference. Thanks to the well-oiled machine I assume.
warm welcome as usual :)
Wonderful positive atmosphere. Great energy at the end of the day with the band. Appreciated the healthy fruit in addition to the cookies in the breaktime.
inspiring speeches delivered captively by lovely plenary speakers:-) also other sessions I attended were all inspiring and well prepared:-) the atmosphere overall was great all day long:-)
It was fantastic to realize that we not only need to take a breath and focus (from day one) but to see who, what, where, when & why we are all here. When that is lost in some, it is hard to grab back. My team needs that feeling again.
Just amazing and very inspiring. Thank you for an excwllent start to the day.
Elizabeth Coleman's session was stunningly good.
Congratulations on a great conference!
Everything was perfect. The organizers, the presentation, the hosting and everyting was exceptionally good.
The best conference ever ??
Both plenary sessions were remarkable. The helping hand students were welcoming and very helpful. The organization team was outstanding.

4. Q.2 Format
Excellent Good Satisfactory Poor 0.00

5. Q.3 Plenary Sessions
Excellent Good Satisfactory Poor 0.00

6. Q.4. Invited speakers
Excellent Good Satisfactory Poor 1.79

7. Q.5. Concurrent Sessions
Learners:Excellent:67.71 Good: Satisfactory:3.92 Poor: 1.96 Educators:Excellent:41.82 Good: Satisfactory:3.64 Poor: 1.82

8. Q.6. Posters
Learners:Excellent:53.19 Good: Satisfactory:4.26 Poor: 0.00 Educators:Excellent:45.10 Good: Satisfactory:9.80 Poor: 0.00

9. Q.7 Exhibition Area Excellent:23.21 Good:42.86 66.07
Satisfactory: Poor: 1.96
Chaotic, very narrow, prize,great!

10. Q.8.Conference management
Before the Conf. E S.7.41 G P During the Conf. E S.5.66 G P.1.89

11. Q.10.Recommendations
More Tony!

13. DAY 2

14. Q1.Conference
Excellent
Good
84.94
Satisfactory
Poor

15. Q.2 Format Excellent 56.16 Good 31.51 -------- 87.67
Satisfactory
Poor

16. Q.3 Plenary Sessions
Excellent Good Satisfactory Poor 2.74

17. Q.4. Invited speakers
Excellent Good Satisfactory 6.94 Poor 1.39

18. Q.5. Concurrent Sessions
Learners:Excellent:42.26 Good: Satisfactory:14.29 Poor: 2.86 Educators:Excellent:40.91 Good: Satisfactory:12.12 Poor: 4.55

19. Q.6. Posters
Learners:Excellent:53.19 Good: Satisfactory:4.26 Poor: 0.00 Educators:Excellent:45.10 Good: Satisfactory:9.80 Poor: 0.00

20. Q.7 Exhibition Area Excellent:23.21 Good:42.86 66.07
Satisfactory: Poor:16%
Chaotic, very narrow, prize,great!

21. Q.8.Conference management
Before the Conf. E S G P During the Conf. E S G P

22. Please provide any topics and / or activities that you would like to see included in future conferences or events at Sabancı University School of Languages
From ‘Neuroscience in education’ to ‘skills teaching’ and ‘assessment’ many areas are listed.