Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Robocalling Blocking Cause and Effect

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Robocalling Blocking Cause and Effect"— Presentation transcript:

1 Robocalling Blocking Cause and Effect

2 Robocalls - State of industry
Robocalling, spamming, scamming, spoofing are scenarios that play out for consumers multiple times a week. 28.5 Billion US only number of robocall received 2018 FCC has received 3.7 million complaints in 2018 In the past year more than 740,000 Canadians have complained to the Canadian Anti-Fraud Centre about being targeted by a phone scam The CRTC receives more complaints about nuisance communications—specifically, spam and telemarketing than any other subject.

3 Robocalls - State of industry
Unregulated call blocking and labeling solution providers are making the decisions on how to present legal enterprise calls to the consumer There are technologies to identify and block illegal robocalls, but they are getting it wrong in the U.S.

4 STIR/SHAKEN STIR: Secure Telephone Identity Revisited - defines a signature to verify the calling number, and specifies how it will be transported in SIP “on the wire”. SHAKEN: Signature-based Handling of Asserted information using toKENs - the framework document developed to provide an implementation profile for Service Providers implementing STIR. Together, STIR and SHAKEN represent the SIP protocol changes, signature standard, and interoperability framework.

5 Benefits & Limitations
Consumers will have more information when deciding whether to answer a call. The identity of the originating carrier is included with the call authentication information. Knowing the originating carrier will accelerate illegal robocall tracebacks and enforcement. Limitations It can only identify if a call was not spoofed – not whether or not the caller is a scammer. It only works on an IP end-to-end call path. The benefits will not fully materialize until all service providers implement the STIR/SHAKEN standards

6 Analytics Server STIR/SHAKEN will provide crucial layer of protection, however, consensus is clear: a layered approach requiring access to an Analytics Server at the Verification point is also required.

7 Analytics issue example:
Retail/Customer Service

8 Analytics issue example:
Cable/Internet Provider

9 Analytics issue example:
Collections/Account Resolution

10 Analytics Risk

11 Certify calling party trust
Trusted Entity Certification A compliance module to certify the legal entity and call compliance status of your organization across the calling ecosystem Removes the need to verify your compliant calling practices individually with each call blocking & labeling solutions provider Trusted Entity status vetted, verified, and re-certified annually Results Verification across the analytics partner network that you are NOT a bad actor and calls originating from your numbers are NOT to be classified as fraudulent

12 Remove improper scam & fraud
Phone Number Registration Register your numbers across the ecosystem Removes the need to register numbers individually with each call blocking & labeling solutions provider Review monthly ‘Health Check’ summaries of changes to number labeling Result Registered numbers distributed across analytics partner network to accompany your Trusted Enterprise status Numbers won’t be listed as scam or fraud

13 Presented by Marian Hearn – ATIS - The SHAKEN Governance Model Webinar
Canadian STIR/SHAKEN January 2018 the CRTC Compliance and Enforcement Sector issued CRTC , “Measures to reduce caller identification spoofing and to determine the origins of nuisance calls”. That decision directed the Canadian telecom industry to: Develop a traceback process at the CISC Network and Technical Working Group(NTWG), Report on the status of the industry readiness for “authentication and verification of caller ID information for IP voice calls” using STIR/SHAKEN, through NTWG Establish a governance framework Presented by Marian Hearn – ATIS - The SHAKEN Governance Model Webinar

14 Presented by Marian Hearn – ATIS - The SHAKEN Governance Model Webinar
Canadian STIR/SHAKEN A small group of carriers have incorporated the CSTGA to fulfill the role of GA, based on the governance model in ATIS The detailed corporate structure continues to be a work in progress. A technical advisory committee (TC) was established and has produced a Canadian technical requirements document (CTRD) for SHAKEN governance. TC is evaluating technical and operational issues relating to the PA and CA roles, including exchange of international certificates, beginning with Canada/U.S. Informal discussions are ongoing with a number of vendors who are interested in fulfilling the role of PA for Canada. There is ongoing dialogue with CRTC staff regarding formal endorsement of the CSTGA as the Canadian GA. Presented by Marian Hearn – ATIS - The SHAKEN Governance Model Webinar

15 Headquarters 70 East Beaver Creek, #19, Richmond Hill, ON, L4B 3B2 Ottawa (CNA) 150 Isabella Street, Suite 605, Ottawa, ON, K1S 5H3


Download ppt "Robocalling Blocking Cause and Effect"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google