1. George Mason School of Law
Contracts II
D. Statute of Frauds
F.H. Buckley

2. The importance of a writing
Can a contract be enforced absent a writing: The Statute of Frauds
If there is a writing, can a court look beyond it to oral evidence: The Parol Evidence Rule

3. The Statute of Frauds: Why 1677?
Party on, dudes!

4. Why was the SoF needed in 1677?
Juries as fact-finders
Interested parties not admissible as witnesses

5. Why 1677? Juries as fact-finders
Interested parties not admissible as witnesses
If that made the Statute of Frauds necessary then, why do we need it now?

6. What’s the purpose of the SoF?
McIntosh at 517

7. What’s the purpose of the SoF?
Evidentiary
Antifraud 7

8. What’s the purpose of the SoF?
Evidentiary
Antifraud
Cautionary
Reflects seriousness of contracting 8

9. What’s the purpose of the SoF?
Evidentiary
Antifraud
Cautionary
Reflects seriousness of contracting
Channeling
Distinguishing enforceable contracts 9

10. What’s the purpose of the SoF?
Evidentiary
Antifraud
Cautionary
Reflects seriousness of contracting
Channeling
Distinguishing enforceable contracts
[Economizing on court costs?] 10

11. The problem: A trap for the unwary?
It gives us better evidence that there is an agreement
While nullifying what otherwise would be true agreements

12. The Statute of Frauds Restatement § 110
(a) a contract of an executor or administrator to answer for a duty of his decedent;
(b) a contract to answer for the duty of another (the suretyship provision);
(c) a contract made upon consideration of marriage (the marriage provision);
(d) a contract for the sale of an interest in land (the land contract provision);
(e) a contract that is not to be performed within one year from the making thereof (the one-year provision).
(2) The following classes of contracts, which were traditionally subject to the Statute of Frauds, are now governed by Statute of Frauds provisions of the Uniform Commercial Code:
(a) a contract for the sale of goods for the price of $500 or more (Uniform Commercial Code § 2-201);
(c) a contract for the sale of personal property not otherwise covered, to the extent of enforcement by way of action or defense beyond $5,000 in amount or value of remedy (Uniform Commercial Code § 1-206).

13. What is the sanction for non-compliance?
Restatement § 110(1): not enforceable absent a written memorandum signed by the party to be charged

14. What is the sanction for non-compliance?
UCC § 2-201(1) Except as otherwise provided in this section a contract for the sale of goods for the price of $500 or more is not enforceable by way of action or defense unless there is some writing sufficient to indicate that a contract for sale has been made between the parties and signed by the party against whom enforcement is sought or by his authorized agent or broker.

15. Marriage Settlements
The old action for breach of promise

16. Marriage Settlements
A and B promise to marry and A reneges?

17. Marriage Settlements Restatement § 124
Within the SoF if the consideration is a “marriage or a promise to marry” unless only “mutual promises of two persons to marry each other”

18. Promises not to be performed within One Year
Restatement § 110(1)(e)
What is the rationale for the rule?

19. How does the one-year rule work?
“Not to be performed within one year from the making thereof”
What does the Π have to assert to win in McIntosh at 515?

20. How does the one-year rule work?
“Not to be performed within one year from the making thereof”
What does the Π have to assert to win in McIntosh?
Not terminable at will, but for a fixed term 20

21. How does the one-year rule work?
“Not to be performed within one year from the making thereof”
What does the Π have to assert to win in McIntosh?
Not terminable at will, but for a fixed term
What that term might be 21

22. How does the one-year rule work?
“Not to be performed within one year from the making thereof”
What does the Π have to assert to win in McIntosh?
Not terminable at will, but for a fixed term
What that term might be
Gee, let’s say one year 22

23. How does the one-year rule work?
“Not to be performed within one year from the making thereof”
What does the Π have to assert to win in McIntosh?
Not terminable at will, but for a fixed term
What that term might be
But then Δ asserts the promise is not unenforceable by virtue of the Statute of Frauds 23

24. How does the one-year rule work?
“Not to be performed within one year from the making thereof”
It’s Oct. 23, I ask you to work for me from March 1, 2018 until March 1, 2019 24

25. How does the one-year rule work?
“Not to be performed within one year from the making thereof”
It’s Oct. 23, I ask you to work for me from March 1, 2018 until March 1, 2019
Restatement § 130(1) Where any promise in a contract cannot be fully performed within a year from the time the contract is made, all promises in the contract are within the Statute of Frauds until one party to the contract completes his performance. 25

26. How does the one-year rule work?
“Not to be performed within one year from the making thereof”
It’s Oct. 23, I ask you to repaint the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel, which likely will take five years. 26

27. How does the one-year rule work?
It’s Feb. 14, I ask you to repaint the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel, which likely will take five years.
Restatement § 130(1) Where any promise in a contract cannot be fully performed within a year from the time the contract is made 27

28. How does the one-year rule work?
“Not to be performed within one year from the making thereof”
I insure your house against fire for five years without a writing. It burns after three years.
Restatement § 130, illustration 1. 28

29. Land: 110(1)(d) “Tis the only thing worth
fighting for, worth dying for”

30. Is land different?
What do real estate agents make you do if you want to buy a house?

31. Is land different?
What do real estate agents make you do if you want to buy a house?
Written offers throughout
Closing

32. Is land different? Restatement § 125 Qu. Leaseholds? Cf. 125(4)
“A promise to transfer to any person any interest in land”
Qu. Leaseholds? Cf. 125(4)

33. Goods worth more than $500 Restatement § 110(2)(a) → UCC § 2-201
a contract for the sale of goods for the price of $500 or more is not enforceable by way of action or defense unless there is some writing sufficient to indicate that a contract for sale has been made between the parties and signed by the party against whom enforcement is sought or by his authorized agent or broker. A writing is not insufficient because it omits or incorrectly states a term agreed upon but the contract is not enforceable under this paragraph beyond the quantity of goods shown in such writing.

34. Goods worth more than $500 Restatement § 110(2)(a) → UCC § 2-201
a contract for the sale of goods for the price of $500 or more is not enforceable by way of action or defense unless there is some writing sufficient to indicate that a contract for sale has been made between the parties and signed by the party against whom enforcement is sought or by his authorized agent or broker. A writing is not insufficient because it omits or incorrectly states a term agreed upon but the contract is not enforceable under this paragraph beyond the quantity of goods shown in such writing.

35. Goods worth more than $500 Restatement § 110(2)(a) → UCC § 2-201
a contract for the sale of goods for the price of $500 or more is not enforceable by way of action or defense unless there is some writing sufficient to indicate that a contract for sale has been made between the parties and signed by the party against whom enforcement is sought or by his authorized agent or broker. A writing is not insufficient because it omits or incorrectly states a term agreed upon but the contract is not enforceable under this paragraph beyond the quantity of goods shown in such writing.

36. Suretyship (guarantor)
Seller of Ferrari
Idiot, Doting Parent Spendthrift Child
stands surety 36

37. George Mason School of Law
Contracts II
D. Statute of Frauds
F.H. Buckley

38. Restatement § 110 MY LEGS M: consideration of marriage;
Y: not to be performed within one year;
L: sale of an interest in land;
E: a contract of an executor;
G: sale of goods for $500 or more;
S: a contract to answer for the duty of another (the suretyship provision)

39. The problem: A trap for the unwary?
It gives us better evidence that there is an agreement
While nullifying what otherwise would be true agreements

40. Getting around the SoF Estoppel Part Performance
Note or memorandum in writing 40

41. What is Estoppel?

42. What is Estoppel? Estoppel by representation of fact
Promissory estoppel

43. Restatement § 90(1) A promise which:
the promisor should reasonably expect to induce action or forbearance on the part of the promisee or a third person
and which does induce such action or forbearance
is binding if injustice can be avoided only by enforcement of the promise. The remedy granted for breach may be limited as justice requires.

44. Will estoppel work against the SoF?
Restatement § 139(1). A promise which the promisor should reasonably expect to induce action or forbearance on the part of the promisee or a third person and which does induce the action or forbearance is enforceable notwithstanding the Statute of Frauds if injustice can be avoided only by enforcement of the promise. The remedy granted for breach is to be limited as justice requires.

45. Will estoppel work against the SoF?
Restatement § 139(2) In determining whether injustice can be avoided only by enforcement of the promise, the following circumstances are significant: (a) the availability and adequacy of other remedies, particularly cancellation and restitution; (b) the definite and substantial character of the action or forbearance in relation to the remedy sought; (c) The extent to which the action of forbearance corroborates evidence of the making and terms of the promise, or the making and terms are otherwise established by clear and convincing evidence; (d) the reasonableness of the action or forbearance; (e) the extent to which the action of forbearance was foreseeable by the promisor.

46. Was McIntosh a proper case for estoppel? Casebook 515
Oh, the hardship!!!

47. Was McIntosh a proper case for estoppel?
What do you think would have
happened if McIntosh had asked
for a written contract?

48. Are salesmen given tenure?
Ron Popeil and the Veg-o-matic 48

49. Was McIntosh a proper case for estoppel?
If you’re Murphy, how do you
react to the decision? 49

50. The Limits of Estoppel
Olympic Holding at 522 50

51. Is land different? Restatement § 125
“A promise to transfer to any person any interest in land”
What counts as reliance? Schwedes at 521
Securing financing?
The offer to send the purchase price?

52. Part Performance and Land
Cf. Restatement § 129
The party to be charged “has so changed his position that injustice can be avoided only by specific performance” 52

53. Part Performance and Land
Restatement § 129
Buyer gives seller purchase price. Can buyer have specific performance?
Cf. Illustration 1
Is Buyer without a remedy? 53

54. The “note or memorandum in writing”
Restatement § 131. Unless additional requirements are prescribed by the particular statute, a contract within the Statute of Frauds is enforceable if it is evidenced by any writing, signed by or on behalf of the party to be charged, which (a) reasonably identifies the subject matter of the contract, (b) is sufficient to indicate that a contract with respect thereto has been made between the parties or offered by the signer to the other party, and (c) states with reasonable certainty the essential terms of the unperformed promises in the contract.

55. The UCC on the “note or memorandum in writing”
UCC § 2-201(1)(1) Except as otherwise provided in this section a contract for the sale of goods for the price of $500 or more is not enforceable by way of action or defense unless there is some writing sufficient to indicate that a contract for sale has been made between the parties and signed by the party against whom enforcement is sought or by his authorized agent or broker. A writing is not insufficient because it omits or incorrectly states a term agreed upon but the contract is not enforceable under this paragraph beyond the quantity of goods shown in such writing.

56. The UCC on the “note or memorandum in writing”
UCC § 2-201(1)(1) Except as otherwise provided in this section a contract for the sale of goods for the price of $500 or more is not enforceable by way of action or defense unless there is some writing sufficient to indicate that a contract for sale has been made between the parties and signed by the party against whom enforcement is sought or by his authorized agent or broker. A writing is not insufficient because it omits or incorrectly states a term agreed upon but the contract is not enforceable under this paragraph beyond the quantity of goods shown in such writing.
What’s the difference with the Restatement?

57. The “note or memorandum in writing”
What is a signature?
Cf. Restatement § 134: “any symbol made or adopted with an intention, actual or apparent, to authenticate the writing as that of the signer”

58. Monetti at 525
Melform products

59. Monetti
How was this within the SoF?

60. Monetti How was this within the SoF? One year Sale of Goods?
Why might it matter which it is?

61. Monetti How was this within the SoF? One year Sale of Goods?
Why might it matter which it is?
Part performance

62. Monetti How was this within the SoF? One year Sale of Goods?
Why might it matter which it is?
Cf. UCC 2-201(3)(c):
“with respect to goods for which payment has been made and accepted or which have been received and accepted”

63. Monetti What was the part performance?
Restatement § 139(2)(b): a factor re estoppel is the “definite and substantial character of the action”
UCC § 2-201(3)(c): contract enforceable re goods “received and accepted” 63

64. Monetti In what sense is this not like a sale of goods?
Cf. UCC 2-105(1) (“goods”)
Sale of goods or distributorship agreement?
Which one fits better (predominant purpose)?
Both statutes?
A mixed contract (pick and choose)?

65. Monetti
Who is the party to be charged?

66. Monetti
How was the first writing “signed” by Anchor?

67. Monetti How was the first writing “signed” by Anchor?
Typed initials “SS” on Steve Schneider’s draft “Topics for Discussion”

68. Monetti
UCC § 1-201(37) Signed “includes any symbol executed or adopted by a party with present intention to adopt or accept a writing.”
Restatement § 134 (“any symbol made or adopted with an intention, actual or apparent, to authenticate a writing”)

69. Monetti How was the first writing “signed” by Anchor?
Typed initials “SS”
Did it matter that this was a pre-contractual draft?

70. Monetti How was the first writing “signed” in Monetti?
Typed initials “SS”
Did it matter that this was a pre-contractual draft?
Restatement § 136: “at any time before or after the formation of the contract”

71. Monetti How was the first writing “signed” in Monetti?
Typed initials “SS”
Did it matter that this was a pre-contractual draft?
UCC§ 2-201(1): “has been made”

72. Monetti
What about the internal “summary agreement” by Raymond Davis?

73. Monetti
What about the internal memo?
Δ’s letterhead suffices

74. Monetti What about the internal memo? Δ’s letterhead suffices
Is Restatement § 132 applicable?:
Several writings are integrated if one is signed and the circumstances indicate they belong to the same transaction

75. Monetti What about the internal memo? Δ’s letterhead suffices
How did Π obtain this?
Is Restatement § 132 applicable?
Posner: probably not, since they don’t refer to each other (527)
Posner: “we are permitted to connect them” (529)