1. Bunker Critical Design Review Welcome & Charge
Shane Kennedy
NSS Project Leader
Bunker CDR#2, Medicon Village, 15th October 2018

2. NSS Project scope: 15 neutron instruments + test beamline + support labs
Nuclear Physics Institute
BEER
D07
D08
D04
E03
E04 +
C-SPEC
NMX
BIFROST
MIRACLES
ODIN
MAGIC
DREAM
T-REX
HEIMDAL
Test Beam Line
VESPA
FREIA
LOKI
ESS Lead Partners for instrument construction
SKADI +
ESTIA
ESS In-Kind Partners also collaborate on sample environment, data management, lab fitout (D04, D08, E03 & E04) etc.
ESS Instrument Layout (September 2017)

3. Recent history (CDR#1 -. CDR#2)
Main changes needed after CDR#1 (i.e. Requirements, neutronics, documentation)
Zvonko will discuss
ESS Rebaselining:
BOT shift from Oct 2019 to July 2022
consequences for bunker

4. Rebaseline schedule for Neutron Beam Instruments (V4
Rebaseline schedule for Neutron Beam Instruments (V4.0, 11th May 2018) from Installation workshop with teams building first 8 Instruments (8th May)
Preliminary Design
Detailed Design
Manufacturing & Procurement
Installation & Integration
Hot Commissioning/Early science
Operation
West sector
North sector
East and South sectors
Current date
First access to NSS bldgs (E01)
Start User Program (3NBI*)
BOT & start HC of NBI*
8NBI* in User Program
Safest instrument choices to be Ready for SOUP in West sector (BEER, CSPEC, BIFROST & MAGIC) & East (ESTIA)
Most desirable instrument choices for early science highlights are in the South and North (ODIN, DREAM & LOKI).
Selection of first NBI for SOUP in March 2023
Knock-on delays to NBI: – 15 of ~ 1 yr and – 22 of ~ 1 ½ yr
* NBI = Neutron Beam Instrument

5. CDR committee members External members: Internal (ESS) Members:
Phil Ferguson (chair), SNS
Tim Broome, STFC
Romuald Hanslik, FZ-Jülich
Internal (ESS) Members:
Masa Arai, Technical Coordinator
François Javier, ESH & Q
Rikard Linander, Target Division

6. Charge for this review meeting
Purpose: to assess whether bunker design satisfies all stated design requirements and whether it is defined at a level of detail consistent with release for engineering detailing and manufacturing, according to the procurement/production plan for the project:
Specific questions:
Are system requirements and interface requirements properly defined and complete?
Have safety and hazards been properly considered and addressed?
Do the System Design Description documents and related drawings adequately describe the design to the degree needed for fabrication or procurement; as per the project plan?
Does the design satisfy the functional and performance requirements?
Are the Manufacturing Plan, the Installation Plan, and System Analysis Reports finalized and do they support the stated design?

7. Agenda for CDR (1/3)

8. Agenda for CDR (2/3)

9. Agenda for CDR (3/3)