Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byAbigail Armstrong Modified over 5 years ago
1
Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services (MAES)
2nd meeting of MAES Working Group Anne Teller, DG Environment Brussels, 18/06/2012
2
Follow-up of meeting of 13 March
Draft Mandate & Scoping document Policy questions Draft list of core tasks Analytical framework Matrix of ecosystems and ecosystem services to be mappend and assessed Conceptual model Valuation methods Scientific input/outreach Supporting work Next steps
3
1, MAES WG Mandate & Scoping
Draft revised by DG ENV according to: Governance: explicit functional links with CGBN and NDM Composition: involvement of stakeholders Working methods: mandate of SG Expected outcomes: broader context of SGA and IPBES, link with target 2 No amendment required to Scoping document to be forwarded to CGBN of 6/9/12
4
2. Policy questions ENV to draft a list of key policy questions addressed by MAES and based on UK NEA with more focus on restoration Comments received from BE, ES, NL, KNEU
5
Policy questions (1-6) 1. What are the status and trends of the EU’s ecosystems and the services they provide to society? 2. What are the drivers causing changes in the EU’s ecosystems and their services? 3. Which vital EU provisioning services are not provided by EU ecosystems? 4. How can we secure and improve the continued delivery of ecosystem services? 5. How do ecosystem services affect human well-being, who and where are the beneficiaries, and how does this affect how they are valued and managed? 6. What is the current public understanding of ecosystem services and the benefits they provide (some key questions could be useful to be included in the 2012/13 Eurobarometer on Biodiversity)?
6
Policy questions (7-10) 7. Why should we incorporate the economic values of ecosystem services into decision making (question to be addressed 2020)? 8. How might ecosystems and their services change in the EU under plausible future scenarios - including the development of scenarios and options for implementing the 15% restoration target? What would be needed in terms of review of financing instruments? 9. What are the economic implications of different plausible futures? 10. How have we advanced our understanding links between ecosystems, ecosystem functions and ecosystem services? More broadly, what is the influence of ecosystem services on long-term human well-being and what are the knowledge constraints on more informed decision making (question to be addressed to RTD and research community in the context of EU mechanism, KNEU and SPIRAL)?
7
Policy questions (11-12) 11. How can MAES assist MS to set priorities for ecosystem restoration within a strategic framework at sub-national, national and EU level? \How can MAES help to design prioritisation criteria for restoration and at which scale to get significant benefits in a cost-effective way (e.g. relevance for biodiversity; extent of degradation of ecosystems; the provision of key ecosystem services and cost-benefit ratios of restoration)? 12. How can MAES help to define where to strategically deploy green infrastructure in the EU in urban and rural areas to improve ecosystem resilience and habitat connectivity and to enhance the delivery of ecosystem services at Member State and sub-national level? How to foster synergies between existing and planned initiatives at local, regional or national levels in Member States, as well as how to promote further investments, thereby providing added value to Member States action?
8
3. Core tasks & Roadmap Streamlining of reporting: Discussion doc welcomed by Nature, water & Marine Directors at their May/June meetings Scoping study on available research Standards Methodological guidance: - Conceptual model to be further elaborated by MS Glossary of terms & definitions List of core tasks
9
4. Analytical framework First draft elaborated by a group of volunteers on 18 April (JRC, EEA, ENV, NL, DE, FR, ES, experts) Comments received Several iterations (versions 1 to 6) Version 7 made available 2 weeks before WG MAES Meeting of 18 June Compilation and clustering of comments sent separately Comments expected from MS on 18 June
10
RUBICODE matrix, 2010 6 terrestrial ecosystems 17 ecosystem services
11
Matrix of broad ecosystems and ESS 2012
12 ecosystems including marine Urban Crop Agric. mosaic Grass Wood Forest Trans. Wood Heath Shrub Sparse Veget. Inland waters Coastal Rivers Lakes Marine Provisioning Services Regulating Services Cultural Services Ecosystem services (CICES) 22 Ecosystem services (TEEB) 21 Ecosystem services (MA)
12
Conceptual model? TEEB Cascade, 2011 UK NEA, 2011 DPSIR, EEA 2012
13
TEEB revised framework: ecosystem - functions – services - benefits - values
14
5. Scientific contribution
JRC Enlargement workshop TEEB-BE D0 Conference Biodiversity Knowledge Conf. MAES-BE follow-up meeting ECCB Conference, Glasgow AlterNet Conference, EPBRS Irish Presidency event 18-19/4/12 27/4/12 23/5/12 11/6/12 28/8/12-1/9/12 15-18/4/13 tbc
15
6. Supporting work BISE Ecosystem Platform Public circa on Functional mailbox ENV contract on valuation ( ) REGIO's support at NUTS 2 level EEA report on ecosystem accounts, October 2012 Launch ENV contracts on mapping biodiversity and ESS in EU and MS, restoration, no net loss, autumn 2012 ENV.C3 support on air pollution impact on biodiversity (2012) EEA questionnaire, 2012
16
7. Next steps Next steps Dates
WG MAES mandate + scoping to be validated by CGBN 6/9/12 Call for MS involment in MAES workshop at NDM, Cyprus 17-18/9/12 Presentation of TEEB-EU valuation contract outcomes at MAES WG 13/9/12 Results of ecosystem capital accounting to be presented by EEA at MAES WG Agreement on MAES analytical framework & policy questions at Stakeholder workshop November 2012 Dedicated Marine MAES workshop June 2013 (tbc)
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.