1. Effects of Ankle-Foot Orthoses on Ankle and Foot Kinematics in Patient With Ankle Osteoarthritis 
Yu-Chi Huang, MD, Kimberly Harbst, PhD, Brian Kotajarvi, MS, PT, Diana Hansen, BA, Matthew F. Koff, PhD, Harold B. Kitaoka, MD, Kenton R. Kaufman, PhD 
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 
Volume 87, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
DOI: /j.apmr
Copyright © 2006 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Terms and Conditions

2. Fig 1
Three different types of custom-made foot orthoses (from left to right): an AFO, an HFO-R, and an HFO-A, were evaluated in this study.
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation  , DOI: ( /j.apmr )
Copyright © 2006 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Terms and Conditions

3. Fig 2
A modification of the Akron marker set was used to track foot motion while wearing orthotic devices evaluated in the study.
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation  , DOI: ( /j.apmr )
Copyright © 2006 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Terms and Conditions

4. Fig 3
The sagittal, frontal, and transverse planes ROM (average ± standard deviation [SD]) of the (A) hindfoot and (B) forefoot in ankle OA patients using 3 types of orthoses when walking on a level walkway. *Significant difference (P<.05).
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation  , DOI: ( /j.apmr )
Copyright © 2006 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Terms and Conditions

5. Fig 4
The sagittal, frontal, and transverse planes ROM (average ± SD) of the (A) hindfoot and (B) forefoot in ankle OA patients using 3 types of orthoses when walking down a ramp. *Significant difference (P<.05).
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation  , DOI: ( /j.apmr )
Copyright © 2006 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Terms and Conditions

6. Fig 5
The sagittal, frontal, and transverse planes ROM (average ± SD) of the (A) hindfoot and (B) forefoot in ankle OA patients using 3 types of orthoses when walking up a ramp. *Significant difference (P<.05).
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation  , DOI: ( /j.apmr )
Copyright © 2006 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Terms and Conditions

7. Fig 6
The sagittal, frontal, and transverse planes ROM (average ± SD) of the (A) hindfoot and (B) forefoot in ankle OA patients using 3 types of orthoses when walking on the side-slope high condition. *Significant difference (P<.05).
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation  , DOI: ( /j.apmr )
Copyright © 2006 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Terms and Conditions

8. Fig 7
The sagittal, frontal, and transverse planes ROM (average ± SD) of the (A) hindfoot and (B) forefoot in ankle OA patients using 3 types of orthoses when walking on the side-slope low condition. *Significant difference (P<.05).
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation  , DOI: ( /j.apmr )
Copyright © 2006 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Terms and Conditions