1. 11k Melbourne Agendas Date: 2006-9-18
Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein.
Release: The contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to the IEEE to incorporate material contained in this contribution, and any modifications thereof, in the creation of an IEEE Standards publication; to copyright in the IEEE’s name any IEEE Standards publication even though it may include portions of this contribution; and at the IEEE’s sole discretion to permit others to reproduce in whole or in part the resulting IEEE Standards publication. The contributor also acknowledges and accepts that this contribution may be made public by IEEE
Patent Policy and Procedures: The contributor is familiar with the IEEE 802 Patent Policy and Procedures < ieee802.org/guides/bylaws/sb-bylaws.pdf>, including the statement "IEEE standards may include the known use of patent(s), including patent applications, provided the IEEE receives assurance from the patent holder or applicant with respect to patents essential for compliance with both mandatory and optional portions of the standard." Early disclosure to the Working Group of patent information that might be relevant to the standard is essential to reduce the possibility for delays in the development process and increase the likelihood that the draft publication will be approved for publication. Please notify the Chair as early as possible, in written or electronic form, if patented technology (or technology under patent application) might be incorporated into a draft standard being developed within the IEEE Working Group. If you have questions, contact the IEEE Patent Committee Administrator at

2. 802.11k Melbourne Agenda 9/18/06 Monday
Radio Resource Measurement
802.11k Melbourne Agenda 9/18/06 Monday
Sign In +

3. Radio Resource Measurement
Agenda
Radio Resource Measurement
Patent Policy
Inappropriate Topics
Documentation and Presentation Rules
LB86 Comment Resolution
Attendance
Security

4. 6. Patents
IEEE standards may include the known use of essential patents and patent applications provided the IEEE receives assurance from the patent holder or applicant with respect to patents whose infringement is, or in the case of patent applications, potential future infringement the applicant asserts will be, unavoidable in a compliant implementation of either mandatory or optional portions of the standard [essential patents]. This assurance shall be provided without coercion. The patent holder or applicant should provide this assurance as soon as reasonably feasible in the standards development process. This assurance shall be provided no later than the approval of the standard (or reaffirmation when a patent or patent application becomes known after initial approval of the standard). This assurance shall be either:
a) A general disclaimer to the effect that the patentee will not enforce any of its present or future patent(s) whose use would be required to implement either mandatory or optional portions of the proposed IEEE standard against any person or entity complying with the standard; or
b) A statement that a license for such implementation will be made available without compensation or under reasonable rates, with reasonable terms and conditions that are demonstrably free of any unfair discrimination.
This assurance is irrevocable once submitted and accepted and shall apply, at a minimum, from the date of the standard's approval to the date of the standard's withdrawal and is irrevocable during that period.

5. Inappropriate Topics for IEEE WG
Don’t discuss the validity/essentiality of patents/patent claims
Don’t discuss the cost of specific patent use
Don’t discuss licensing terms or conditions
Don’t discuss product pricing, territorial restrictions, or market share
Don’t discuss ongoing litigation or threatened litigation
Don’t be silent if inappropriate topics are discussed… do formally object.
If you have questions, contact the IEEE-SA Standards Board Patent Committee Administrator at or visit
This slide set is available at

6. Radio Resource Measurement
Documentation
Radio Resource Measurement
Present draft is 5.0 Word and 5.0 pdf
Documents must be on the server before presenting
For lb86 comment processing, need a Word/spreadsheet document with changes to D5.0 + (if necessary) a Powerpoint to present them + drafted motion to instruct the editor

7. Radio Resource Measurement
Meeting Objectives
Radio Resource Measurement
Whole Melbourne Meeting:
lb86 Technical Comment Resolution
Recirc Letter Ballot

8. Radio Resource Measurement
Melbourne Work
Radio Resource Measurement
Technical Comment Resolution
Next major milestone: Recirc Letter Ballot

9. Radio Resource Measurement
Assignments
Radio Resource Measurement
Gray: Annex D MIB
Ganesh: Annex A
Clause 10
11.11
/22
Lefkowitz: Clause
11.12
Kwak: Clause
11.13 12 15 17 18
Hart: Clause 7.1
7.2
7.3.1
7.4
11.9
Paine: Clause 0 2 3 4 5
Kwak: Clause 11.1
11.14
Ecclesine: Clause
Clause
Clause
Annex I
Matta

10. TASK GROUP K AGENDA - Monday Sep 18th 2006 - 1330-2130
Monday Agenda
Radio Resource Measurement
TASK GROUP K AGENDA - Monday Sep 18th 1 II
Meeting Call to Order -
PAINE
13:30 2
*II
REVIEW IEEE/802 & POLICIES and RULES (IP, Voting, Robert's Rules, etc) 15 3
*MI
APPROVE OR MODIFY AGENDA 10
13:45 4 DT
Set/Review Objectives
PAINE / ALL
13:55 5
Update on Teleconference Results
14:10 6
Call for Presentations
PAINE/ALL
14:25 7
Review Comments and Technical Presentations 50
14:40 8
Recess until 1930
240
15:30
19:30 9
105
19:45
Recess until 9/19/06
21:30

11. Radio Resource Measurement
Work Approach
Radio Resource Measurement
Comment Resolution by Clause
Joe Kwak to do a draft 6.0 by Wed afternoon?

12. Radio Resource Measurement
Monday Presentations
Radio Resource Measurement
240 minutes total on Monday
Discussion of LB 86 comments
#7 – may need to bring the optional Noise Histogram up to the whole WG
#53 – editors meeting discussion about 15B vs 15b
#54 – definition of operation channel – ask Adrian
Recess until 1520
#151 -
Recess until 7:30pm to work on LB86 comments

13. Radio Resource Measurement
802.11k Agenda Tues 9/19/06
Sign In +

14. Radio Resource Measurement
Tuesday Agenda
Radio Resource Measurement
LB86 Comment Resolution
Motion: Move to pick up the 9/21/06 PM2 to do final votes on a draft going to recirculation letter ballot.
Move: Kwak
Second: Hart
4/0/0
Reminder to get ready to vote on minutes of San Diego and teleconferences
Vote on minutes
Paine LB86 Comment Resolutions
Motions ready for tomorrow (QoS removal and Noise optional and Parallel optional)

15. San Diego Minutes Vote
Move to accept the San Diego minutes found in 06/1037r6.
Moved: Kwak
Second: Ganesh
Result: 7/0/0

16. Telecon Minutes Vote
Move to accept the Jul-Sep teleconference minutes found in 06/1137r5.
Moved: Hart
Second: Kwak
Result: 7/0/0

17. Motion
Move to change the Noise Histogram PICS category from mandatory to optional (#2, 218, 219, 220).
Moved:
Second:
Result:

18. Motion
Move to change the PICS category for Parallel measurement capability from mandatory to optional (#7).
Moved:
Second:
Result:

19. TASK GROUP K AGENDA - Tuesday Sep 19th 2006 - 0800-1000
Radio Resource Measurement
TASK GROUP K AGENDA - Tuesday Sep 19th 8 II
Meeting Call to Order -
PAINE
08:00 9 DT
Call for Presentations
PAINE/ALL 15 10
Review Comments and Technical Presentations
105
08:15
Recess until 1330
210
10:00 11
13:30 12
13:45
Recess until 9/20/06
15:30

20. Radio Resource Measurement
802.11k Agenda Wed 9/20/06
Sign In +

21. TASK GROUP K AGENDA - Wednesday Sep 20th 2006 - 1600-1800
Radio Resource Measurement
TASK GROUP K AGENDA - Wednesday Sep 20th 13 II
Meeting Call to Order -
PAINE
16:00 14 DT
Call for Presentations
PAINE/ALL 15
Review Comments and Technical Presentations
105
16:15
Recess until 9/21/06
210
18:00

22. Radio Resource Measurement
Wednesday Presentations
Radio Resource Measurement
LB86 Ballot Results
1615 Votes on Noise and Parallel Mandatory or Options
Hart Comment Resolutions
Ganesh Comment Resolutions
Ecclesine Comment Resolutions
Kwak Comment Resolutions

23. Radio Resource Measurement
LB86 Results
Radio Resource Measurement
514: Voter Pool 325: Approve 59  : Do Not Approve 44  : Abstain 428 : Total Votes Cast Return Ratio: 83% This return ratio is valid if it exceeded the 50% acceptance level (514 Voters) Ballot Approval: 85 % With this result the balloted draft passed both the 75% approval level and the 50% return ratio acceptance level per the WG and 802 LMSC P&Ps.

24. Motion
Move to change the Noise Histogram PICS category from mandatory to optional (#2, 218, 219, 220).
Moved: Hansen
Second: Ganesh
Result: 10/10/1
Motion Fails

25. Motion
Move to change the PICS category for Parallel measurement capability from mandatory to optional (#7).
Moved: Hansen
Second: James
Result: 7/6/1
Motion Fails

26. Radio Resource Measurement
802.11k Agenda Thu 9/21/06
Sign In +

27. TASK GROUP K AGENDA - Thursday Sep 21th 2006 - 1030-1230
Radio Resource Measurement
TASK GROUP K AGENDA - Thursday Sep 21th 16 II
Meeting Call to Order -
PAINE
10:30 17 DT
Review Comments and Technical Presentations
PAINE/ALL
100 18
Vote on Going to Recirculation Letter Ballot or Sponsor Ballot 20
12:10 19
ADJOURN
12:30

28. Radio Resource Measurement
Thursday Presentations
Radio Resource Measurement
Ganesh Discussion on 2 comments
Kwak Comment Resolutions
5 Comments to Close
Votes on spreadsheets
Hart Comment Resolutions 06/1489r2
Ganesh Comment Resolutions 06/1468r1 and 06/1480r1
Ecclesine Comment Resolutions 06/1510r1
Kwak Comment Resolutions 06/1529r1
Paine Comment Resolutions 06/1496r1
Gray Comment Resolutions 06/1545r0 - +discussion
Votes on LBXX

29. Motion
Move to remove QoS Metrics from the next version of the TGk draft.
Moved: Ganesh
Seconded: Ecclesine
Discussion on Motion
For: 0 Against: 8 Abstain: 0

30. Motion
Move to accept the resolutions for TGk LB86 comments as written in spreadsheet document 06/1489r2, assigned to Hart, and to instruct the secretary to incorporate all such resolutions therein into the next version of the comment resolutions rollup spreadsheet and instruct the editor to incorporate all such resolutions therein into the next TGk draft.
Moved: Hart
Seconded: Ecclesine
Discussion on Motion
For: 8 Against: 0 Abstain: 0

31. Motion
Move to counter CID33 with resolution “the AP Service Load is renamed to AP Average Access Delay. See resolutions to CID158 and CID257,” and instruct the TGk editor to incorporate these changes into the next version of the TGk draft.
Moved: Kwak
Seconded: Hart
Discussion on Motion
For: Against: Abstain:

32. Motion
Move to decline CID34 with resolution “the mathematical expression on P47L22, is used as a means to describe the required scaling for the access delay subfields. The use of logarithms in the description of the required scaling does not imply any required implementation. An alternate and equivalent description of the required scaling may be defined in a table or by a number of other descriptions. The implementer may choose to implement this scaling in many different ways. Table lookup for the scaled values is a low complexity implementation, but is not required. Any implementation of the required scaling is allowed. Also see related CID159.”
Moved: Kwak
Seconded: Ganesh
Discussion on Motion
For: Unanimous Against: Abstain:

33. Motion
Move to counter CIDs 29, 30, and 257 with resolution “As the commenter notes, any interference in the BSS which would trigger physical carrier sense, would increase the measured access delay. This interference is not, strictly speaking, a load element.” P43L3: change “BSS Load” to “BSS Average Access Delay”, here and in all places. P43L4: replace the first sentence of this paragraph; “BSS Average Access Delay element contains the average AP access delay which is a measure of service load in the BSS.” P43L8; change “AP Service Load” to “AP Average Access Delay” here and in all places. Also see related comment resolution in CID 158.” Instruct the TGk editor to incorporate these changes into the next version of the TGk draft.
Moved: Kwak
Seconded: Hart
Discussion on Motion
For: Unanimous Against: Abstain:

34. Motion
Move to accept the resolutions for TGk LB86 comments as written in spreadsheet document 06/1529r1, assigned to Kwak, and to instruct the secretary to incorporate all such resolutions therein into the next version of the comment resolutions rollup spreadsheet and instruct the editor to incorporate all such resolutions therein into the next TGk draft.
Moved: Kwak
Seconded: Hart
Discussion on Motion
For: Unanimous Against: Abstain:

35. Motion
Move to accept the resolutions for TGk LB86 comments as written in spreadsheet document 06/1468r2, assigned to Ganesh, and to instruct the secretary to incorporate all such resolutions therein into the next version of the comment resolutions rollup spreadsheet and instruct the editor to incorporate all such resolutions therein into the next TGk draft.
Moved: Ganesh
Seconded: Kwak
Discussion on Motion
For: Unanimous Against: Abstain:

36. Motion
Move to incorporate the normative text as written in doc 06/1480r2 into the next version of the TGk draft.
Moved: Ganesh
Seconded: Hart
Discussion on Motion
For: Unanimous Against: Abstain:

37. Motion
Move to accept the resolutions for TGk LB86 comments as written in spreadsheet document 06/1496r1, assigned to Paine, and to instruct the secretary to incorporate all such resolutions therein into the next version of the comment resolutions rollup spreadsheet and instruct the editor to incorporate all such resolutions therein into the next TGk draft.
Moved: Paine
Seconded: Hart
Discussion on Motion
For: Unanimous Against: Abstain:

38. Motion
Move to accept the resolutions for TGk LB86 comments as written in spreadsheet document 06/1545r0, assigned to Gray, and to instruct the secretary to incorporate all such resolutions therein into the next version of the comment resolutions rollup spreadsheet and instruct the editor to incorporate all such resolutions therein into the next TGk draft.
Moved: Kwak
Seconded: Hart
Discussion on Motion
For: Unanimous Against: Abstain:

39. Vote on Acceptance of Draft 5.X
Move to post Draft 5.X as interim drafts on the Working Group Website.
Approve: Unanimous
Decline:
Abstain:
Move: Hart
Second: Ganesh

40. WG Motion to Approve a Procedural LB
Motion: approve the issuance of a 15 day Procedural Letter Ballot, starting on or after , asking the question; “Do you believe the TG “k” draft 6.0 is technically complete and ready for LB recirculation?”
Movers: TGk: Hart/Ganesh Result: Unanimous
WG: Result: x-x-x

41. WG Motion for Recirc Following Proc LB
Believing that comment responses in 06/1510r1, 06/1468r2, 06/1489r2, 06/1529r1, 06/1496r1, and 06/1545r0 and the draft mentioned below satisfy WG rules for letter ballot recirculation,
Authorize a 15-day LB recirculation of k draft 6.0 assuming approval of the current draft by a 15 day procedural LB. Letter Ballot recirculation to conclude on or later than
Movers: TGx: Hart/Kwak Result: Unanimous
WG: x/x Result: x-x-x

42. Radio Resource Measurement
802.11k Melbourne 9/22/06
WG Closing Plenary +

43. 802.11k Melbourne Closing Plenary Report
Richard Paine

44. Meeting Objectives Whole Melbourne Meeting: LB86 Comment Resolution
Recirc Letter Ballot
Editor Transition to Joe Kwak

45. Meeting Objectives Met
Whole Melbourne Meeting:
100% LB86 (256) Comments Resolved

46. Accomplishments
~256 Comments resolved

47. Sponsor Ballot Comment Resolution
Objectives for Nov 2006
Recirc Letter Ballot XX Comment Resolution
Sponsor Ballot
Enforcement of comments on changed text only or previously declined/countered comments
Objectives for Jan 2006
Sponsor Ballot Comment Resolution

48. Plans
Plan until next meeting: Weekly Teleconferences on Thu noon Eastern Time starting on
Plan for start of next meeting: Recirculation LBXX Comment Resolution
Next major milestone: Sponsor Ballot

49. Next Telecom 2006-9-28 2006-9-28 Meeting:
Comment resolution processing

50. WG Motion to Approve a Procedural LB
Motion: approve the issuance of a 15 day Procedural Letter Ballot, starting on or after , asking the question; “Do you believe the TG “k” draft 6.0 is technically complete and ready for LB recirculation?”
Movers: TGk: Hart/Ganesh Result: Unanimous
WG: Result: x-x-x

51. WG Motion for Recirc Following Proc LB
Believing that comment responses in 06/1510r1, 06/1468r2, 06/1489r2, 06/1529r1, 06/1496r1, and 06/1545r0 and the draft mentioned below satisfy WG rules for letter ballot recirculation,
Authorize a 15-day LB recirculation of k draft 6.0 assuming approval of the current draft by a 15 day procedural LB. Letter Ballot recirculation to conclude on or later than
Movers: TGx: Hart/Kwak Result: Unanimous
WG: x/x Result: x-x-x