1. Gender and age effects on elbow joint stiffness in healthy subjects
Chou-Ching K. Lin, MD, PhD, Ming-Shaung Ju, PhD, Han-Wei Huang, MD 
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 
Volume 86, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
DOI: /j.apmr

2. Fig 1
An example result of the upper-limb pendulum test. Full extension is defined as 0°; “a” is the maximal swing angle, “b” is the final steady angle, and both are referenced to the initial position. The numbers inside the plot show the number of swings.
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation  , 82-85DOI: ( /j.apmr )

3. Fig 2
Age distribution of (A) subjects and (B) body weights. Legend: shaded bars, male groups; open bars, female groups.
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation  , 82-85DOI: ( /j.apmr )

4. Fig 3
Age distribution of (A) the number of swings and (B) the relaxation index. Legend: shaded bars, male groups; open bars, female groups.
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation  , 82-85DOI: ( /j.apmr )

5. Fig 4
Age distribution of (A) the stiffness constant and (B) the damping coefficient. Legend: shaded bars, male groups; open bars, female groups.
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation  , 82-85DOI: ( /j.apmr )

6. Fig 5
Age distribution of (A) K/W and (B) C/W. Legend: shaded bars, male groups; open bars, female groups.
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation  , 82-85DOI: ( /j.apmr )