Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Narander Kumar and Shalini Agarwal

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Narander Kumar and Shalini Agarwal"— Presentation transcript:

1 A Dynamic Workload Management Model for Saving Electricity Costs in Cloud Data Centers
Narander Kumar and Shalini Agarwal Dept. of Computer Science, BBAU, Lucknow ICACCI-2014

2 Presentation Outline Introduction Motivation The CRAC unit
Challenges for Service Providers Proposed Model and its formulation Proposed Algorithms Experiment Results References

3 What is Cloud Computing?
An “everything-as-a-service” model of computing. A variety of resources are provided over the Internet as ‘Services’ by Cloud Service Provider (CSP). Advantages : On-demand provisioning, Pay-per-use pricing, Scalability, Resource Utilization.

4 Motivation Geographically distributed data centers of cloud provider incur heavy electricity costs due to high prices as well as inefficient workload management among the data centers. To bring down the operational costs dynamic power management is used as the basic approach where different power modes exist for a server. However the air flow pattern of the cooling systems is not taken into consideration in the existing works. This paper investigated that the power consumption and hence the electricity costs of the active servers in the data center is influenced by server utilization as well as output temperature of the cooling unit and proposed two algorithms, Electricity Cost Saving Workload Management Algorithm(ECSWMA) and Electricity Price Aware Workload Management Algorithm (EPAWMA) that jointly manage the workload of all the data centers run by a cloud provider.

5 Layout of CRAC fitted Data Center

6 Challenges for Service Provider
The annual cooling costs incurred in deploying such CRAC units to cool a 30,000 ft square data center with 1000 racks, each consuming 10kW, at an average electricity cost of $100MWhr, is 4 to 8 million dollars. Under the same configuration, a 5 degree centigrade cooler room temperature lowers CRAC power consumption up to 40 %. Therefore in hot zones (top shelves and side racks) more cooling power is required than in the cool zones (bottom selves and inside of the racks).

7 The COP Curve In order to quantitatively measure the efficiency of the cooling system, the metric, Coefficient of Performance (COP) is used. COP is defined as the ratio of the heat removed (HR) to the amount of work done (WD) to remove that heat.  As the temperature of the air that is pushed by the CRAC unit increases the COP also increases. Higher COP indicates more efficient process. Therefore considerable costs can be saved by raising the temperature of the air pushed into the data center without crossing the Safety Temperature

8 Data Center Utilization vs. Cooling Costs
Maximizing server utilization results in higher heat generation which in turn produces higher cooling costs. The opportunities lying between the best and worst workload placement curves can be utilized to design energy consumption aware workload scheduling policy.

9 Workload Management Model

10 Main Parameters Electricity Cost (EC) incurred by the active servers
Electricity cost of cooling system (ECC) Accumulated Electricity Cost (AEC) Scmax is the maximum number of servers in the cool zone Swmax is the maximum number of servers in the warm zone Shmax is maximum number of servers in the hot zone Ti is the maximum safety temperature of the ith zone where i=c, w, h Tserver is the output temperature of a server Load Percentage of the ith zone = Si/Simax, where i=c,w,h Maximum Load Percentage of ith zone Li, where i= c, w, h

11 Formulation of the problem
Minimize Accumulated Electricity Cost (AEC) of the active servers in the data center Subject to- Load Percentage of cool zone<= Lc Load Percentage of cool zone<= Lw Load Percentage of cool zone<= Lh Temperature of cool zone<= Tc Temperature of warm zone<= Tw Temperature of hot zone<= Th Σ Tserver(cool zone)<= Tc Σ Tserver(warm zone)<= Tw Σ Tserver(hot zone)<= Th Sc<= Scmax Sw<= Swmax Sh<= Shmax

12 Electricity Cost Saving Workload Management Algorithm (ECSWMA)

13 Electricity Price Aware Workload Management Algorithm (EPAWMA)

14 AEC of the data centers (ECSWMA-EPAWMA)
Experiment Results AEC of the data centers (ECSWMA-EPAWMA) AEC of the data centers (Existing Approach) Conclusion: With the same rise in the input workload of a data center, the rise in the electricity cost is considerably lower when ECSWMA-EPAWMA approach is implemented for workload distribution.

15 References J. Moore, J. Chase, P. Ranganathan, R. Sharma, Making scheduling cool: temperature-aware workload placement in data centers, in: Proceedings of on USENIX Annual Technical Conference, USENIX, , pp. 5–5, 2005 F. Ahmad, T. Vijaykumar, Joint optimization of idle and cooling power in data centers while maintaining response time, ACM Sigplan Notices, vol. 45, pp. 243–256, 2010 Z. Gou, Z. Duan, Y. Xu, H. J. Chao, JET: Electricity cost aware dynamic workload management in geographically distributed datacenters, Computer Communications, R. Sharma, C. Bash, C. Patel, R. Friedrich, J. Chase, Balance of power: dynamic thermal management for internet data centers, IEEE Internet Comput., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 42–49, 2005 D. J. Bradley, R. E. Harper, and S. W. Hunter. Workloadbased Power Management for Parallel Computer Systems. IBM Journal of Research and Development, vol. 47, pp. 703–718, 2003 J. Chase, D. Anderson, P. Thakar, and A. Vahdat, Managing energy and server resources in hosting centers, In 18th ACM Symposium on Operating System Principles (SOSP'01), pp. 103—116, 2001 A. Qureshi, R. Weber, H. Balakrishnan, J. Guttag, B. Maggs, Cutting the electric bill for internet-scale systems, ACM SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev., vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 123–134, 2009. Y. Zhang, Y. Wang, X. Wang, Greenware: greening cloud-scale data centers to maximize the use of renewable energy, in: Middleware 2011, Springer, pp. 143–164, 2011 A. Beloglazov, R. Buyya, Optimal online deterministic algorithms and adaptive heuristics for energy and performance efficient dynamic consolidation of virtual machines in cloud data centers, Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, vol. 24, pp. 1397–1420, 2012 A. Beloglazov, R. Buyya, Energy efficient resource management in virtualized cloud data centers, in: Proceedings of the th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Cluster, Cloud and Grid Computing, IEEE Computer Society, pp. 826–831, 2010 Hsiao, Hung-Chang; Chung, Hsueh-Yi; Shen, Haiying; Chao, Yu-Chang, Load Rebalancing for Distributed File Systems in Clouds, Parallel and Distributed Systems, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 24, no.5, pp , 2013

16 Any Questions?

17 Thank You


Download ppt "Narander Kumar and Shalini Agarwal"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google