Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byElin Pettersson Modified over 5 years ago
1
Use of computer simulation for determining endovascular skill levels in a carotid stenting model
Jeffrey H. Hsu, MD, PhD, Duraid Younan, MD, Sudha Pandalai, MD, PhD, Bryce T. Gillespie, BA, Raj A. Jain, BA, David W. Schippert, BS, Craig R. Narins, MD, Amit Khanna, MD, Scott M. Surowiec, MD, Mark G. Davies, MD, PhD, Cynthia K. Shortell, MD, Jeffrey M. Rhodes, MD, David L. Waldman, MD, PhD, Richard M. Green, MD, Karl A. Illig, MD Journal of Vascular Surgery Volume 40, Issue 6, Pages (December 2004) DOI: /j.jvs Copyright © 2004 The Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions
2
Fig 1 A, Vascular Intervention System Training simulator. B, Simulated aortic arch angiogram screen capture with right internal carotid artery stenosis circled for clarification. C, Closeup of circled lesion. Journal of Vascular Surgery , DOI: ( /j.jvs ) Copyright © 2004 The Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions
3
Fig 2 Study design. Numbers in brackets represent amount of endovascular experience required for inclusion in each group. Numbers in parentheses for each subgroup represent participants who had completion times for both pretest and final test, and thus could be used in the time analyses. Journal of Vascular Surgery , DOI: ( /j.jvs ) Copyright © 2004 The Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions
4
Fig 3 Completion times for pretest and final tests in both advanced and novice groups after 1 repetition (untrained) and practice plus repetition (trained). *P = .001 vs novice-trained pretest; #P = .001 vs advanced-trained pretest. Error bars represent standard deviation. Journal of Vascular Surgery , DOI: ( /j.jvs ) Copyright © 2004 The Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.