1. Case-study 2, field evaluation: areas of Palaeolithic importance at
“Village Royale”
Francis Wenban-Smith
Heritage in Practice CPD course
University College London
30th March 2017
CAHO-Contracting
Palaeolithic pre-construction
archaeology
Department of Archaeology

2. Introduction Goals Approaches Method options
CAHO-
Contracting
Goals
Approaches
Method options
Geotechnical monitoring, or “let someone else do the work”
Case-study, task 3

3. Goals Establishing presence/importance Selecting appropriate methods
CAHO-
Contracting
Goals
Establishing presence/importance
Selecting appropriate methods
Resolving uncertainty
Grades of importance
Appropriate subsequent actions

4. Approaches Choose methods Phases of evaluation? Non-invasive methods
CAHO-
Contracting
Approaches
Choose methods
Phases of evaluation?
- preliminary window- samples?
- follow-up test pits?
Non-invasive methods
Geo-technical piggy-backing

5. CAHO-
Contracting
Geotechnical - ERT

6. CAHO-
Contracting
Window-samples
Xxxx

7. CAHO-
Contracting
Boreholes

8. CAHO-
Contracting
Test pits:
a - digging

9. b - sieving for Palaeolithic remains
CAHO-
Contracting
Test pits:
b - sieving for Palaeolithic remains

10. Geotechnical monitoring
CAHO-
Contracting
Geotechnical monitoring

11. Your third task, output 3: - find the elephant..
CAHO-
Contracting
.. and the Late Upper Palaeolithic knapping scatter
.. and the undisturbed Clactonian landsurface
.. and the Boyn Hill bankside Acheulian occupation area
.. and the Hoxnian lake

12. Output 3: CAHO- Contracting 1.xx - Boyn Hill deposits?
- Pleistocene deposits?
- window samples
- test pits